DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Templates of expected measurement uncertainties

Abstract

The covariance committee of CSEWG (Cross Section Evaluation Working Group) established templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced total, (n,γ), neutron-induced charged-particle, and (n,xn) reaction cross sections as well as prompt fission neutron spectra, average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities, and fission yields. Templates provide a list of what uncertainty sources are expected for each measurement type and observable, and suggest typical ranges of these uncertainties and correlations based on a survey of experimental data, associated literature, and feedback from experimenters. Information needed to faithfully include the experimental data in the nuclear-data evaluation process is also provided. These templates could assist (a) experimenters and EXFOR compilers in delivering more complete uncertainties and measurement information relevant for evaluations of new experimental data, and (b) evaluators in achieving a more comprehensive uncertainty quantification for evaluation purposes. This effort might ultimately lead to more realistic evaluated covariances for nuclear-data applications. In this topical issue, we cover the templates coming out of this CSEWG effort–typically, one observable per paper. This paper here prefaces this topical issue by introducing the concept and mathematical framework of templates, discussing potential use cases, and giving an example of how they can be applied (estimating missing experimental uncertaintiesmore » of 235U(n,f) average prompt fission neutron multiplicities), and their impact on nuclear-data evaluations.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [5];  [1];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [1];  [13];  [1];  [14];  [1];  [1] more »;  [12];  [1];  [15];  [1];  [16];  [1];  [16];  [10];  [17];  [18];  [10];  [19] « less
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  2. Naval Nuclear Lab., Schenectady, NY (United States)
  3. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  4. US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD (United States)
  5. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  6. Lancaster Univ., Bailrigg (United Kingdom)
  7. National Inst. of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD (United States)
  8. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  9. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden (Germany)
  10. Uppsala Univ. (Sweden)
  11. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  12. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria)
  13. Univ. of Vienna (Austria)
  14. Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States). Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory
  15. Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) (France); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Mixed Organizations (CNRS-UMR), Paris (France). Univ. Bordeaux
  16. Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
  17. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  18. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States)
  19. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Saclay (France). Université Paris-Saclay
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Contributing Org.:
Cross Section Evaluation Working Group
OSTI Identifier:
2205722
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 2212462; OSTI ID: 2217510; OSTI ID: 2229633
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-823070; LA-UR-23-23484; BNL-225031-2023-JAAM
Journal ID: ISSN 2491-9292; 1035828
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344; AC02-98CH10886; 89233218CNA000001; NA0003180; 20SSC000056; SC0021243; SC0012704
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
EPJ Nuclear Sciences and Technologies
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 2491-9292
Publisher:
EDP Sciences
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP)

Citation Formats

Neudecker, Denise, Lewis, Amanda M., Matthews, Eric F., Vanhoy, Jeffrey, Haight, Robert C., Smith, Donald L., Talou, Patrick, Croft, Stephen, Carlson, Allan D., Pierson, Bruce, Wallner, Anton, Al-Adili, Ali, Bernstein, Lee, Capote, Roberto, Devlin, Matthew, Drosg, Manfred, Duke, Dana L., Finch, Sean, Herman, Michal W., Kelly, Keegan J., Koning, Arjan, Lovell, Amy E., Marini, Paola, Montoya, Kristina, Nobre, Gustavo P. A., Paris, Mark, Pritychenko, Boris, Sjöstrand, Henrik, Snyder, Lucas, Sobes, Vladimir, Solders, Andreas, and Taieb, Julien. Templates of expected measurement uncertainties. United States: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1051/epjn/2023014.
Neudecker, Denise, Lewis, Amanda M., Matthews, Eric F., Vanhoy, Jeffrey, Haight, Robert C., Smith, Donald L., Talou, Patrick, Croft, Stephen, Carlson, Allan D., Pierson, Bruce, Wallner, Anton, Al-Adili, Ali, Bernstein, Lee, Capote, Roberto, Devlin, Matthew, Drosg, Manfred, Duke, Dana L., Finch, Sean, Herman, Michal W., Kelly, Keegan J., Koning, Arjan, Lovell, Amy E., Marini, Paola, Montoya, Kristina, Nobre, Gustavo P. A., Paris, Mark, Pritychenko, Boris, Sjöstrand, Henrik, Snyder, Lucas, Sobes, Vladimir, Solders, Andreas, & Taieb, Julien. Templates of expected measurement uncertainties. United States. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2023014
Neudecker, Denise, Lewis, Amanda M., Matthews, Eric F., Vanhoy, Jeffrey, Haight, Robert C., Smith, Donald L., Talou, Patrick, Croft, Stephen, Carlson, Allan D., Pierson, Bruce, Wallner, Anton, Al-Adili, Ali, Bernstein, Lee, Capote, Roberto, Devlin, Matthew, Drosg, Manfred, Duke, Dana L., Finch, Sean, Herman, Michal W., Kelly, Keegan J., Koning, Arjan, Lovell, Amy E., Marini, Paola, Montoya, Kristina, Nobre, Gustavo P. A., Paris, Mark, Pritychenko, Boris, Sjöstrand, Henrik, Snyder, Lucas, Sobes, Vladimir, Solders, Andreas, and Taieb, Julien. Fri . "Templates of expected measurement uncertainties". United States. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2023014. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2205722.
@article{osti_2205722,
title = {Templates of expected measurement uncertainties},
author = {Neudecker, Denise and Lewis, Amanda M. and Matthews, Eric F. and Vanhoy, Jeffrey and Haight, Robert C. and Smith, Donald L. and Talou, Patrick and Croft, Stephen and Carlson, Allan D. and Pierson, Bruce and Wallner, Anton and Al-Adili, Ali and Bernstein, Lee and Capote, Roberto and Devlin, Matthew and Drosg, Manfred and Duke, Dana L. and Finch, Sean and Herman, Michal W. and Kelly, Keegan J. and Koning, Arjan and Lovell, Amy E. and Marini, Paola and Montoya, Kristina and Nobre, Gustavo P. A. and Paris, Mark and Pritychenko, Boris and Sjöstrand, Henrik and Snyder, Lucas and Sobes, Vladimir and Solders, Andreas and Taieb, Julien},
abstractNote = {The covariance committee of CSEWG (Cross Section Evaluation Working Group) established templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced total, (n,γ), neutron-induced charged-particle, and (n,xn) reaction cross sections as well as prompt fission neutron spectra, average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities, and fission yields. Templates provide a list of what uncertainty sources are expected for each measurement type and observable, and suggest typical ranges of these uncertainties and correlations based on a survey of experimental data, associated literature, and feedback from experimenters. Information needed to faithfully include the experimental data in the nuclear-data evaluation process is also provided. These templates could assist (a) experimenters and EXFOR compilers in delivering more complete uncertainties and measurement information relevant for evaluations of new experimental data, and (b) evaluators in achieving a more comprehensive uncertainty quantification for evaluation purposes. This effort might ultimately lead to more realistic evaluated covariances for nuclear-data applications. In this topical issue, we cover the templates coming out of this CSEWG effort–typically, one observable per paper. This paper here prefaces this topical issue by introducing the concept and mathematical framework of templates, discussing potential use cases, and giving an example of how they can be applied (estimating missing experimental uncertainties of 235U(n,f) average prompt fission neutron multiplicities), and their impact on nuclear-data evaluations.},
doi = {10.1051/epjn/2023014},
journal = {EPJ Nuclear Sciences and Technologies},
number = ,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Nov 10 00:00:00 EST 2023},
month = {Fri Nov 10 00:00:00 EST 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Figures / Tables:

Table I Table I: 235U(n,f) $\bar{ν}_p$ experimental data sets included in the example evaluation are identified with their EXFOR No., first author, and year of publication. The last column lists all uncertainty sources that were added based on templates for $\bar{ν}$ in Table 1 of [9]. The information presented here was assembledmore » from parts of Table I of LANL Report [21].« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Evaluation of the Neutron Data Standards
journal, February 2018


ARIADNE – a program estimating covariances in detail for neutron experiments
journal, January 2018


The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Version 2016
report, January 2017

  • Macfarlane, Robert; Muir, Douglas W.; Boicourt, R. M.
  • DOI: 10.2172/1338791

The experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR): Extended computer database and Web retrieval system
journal, April 2018

  • Zerkin, V. V.; Pritychenko, B.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 888
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.045

Energy dependence of for neutron-induced fission of 235U below 1·0 MeV
journal, February 1967


Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Uncertainties: Basic Concepts and Documentation
journal, December 2012


Mean number of prompt neutrons in the fission of U233, U235 Pu239 by 4 and 15 Mev neutrons
journal, February 1958

  • Smirenkin, G. N.; Bondarenko, I. I.; Kutsaeva, L. S.
  • Atomic Energy, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02207352

Determination of Resonance Parameters and their Covariances from Neutron Induced Reaction Cross Section Data
journal, December 2012


Multiplicities of Fission Neutrons
journal, February 1956


Prompt neutrons from fission
journal, October 1963


A Reconciliation of Measurements of for Neutron-Induced Fission of Uranium-235
journal, August 1977

  • Boldeman, J. W.; Fréhaut, J.; Walsh, R. L.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 63, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE77-A27060

Energy Dependence of Promptν¯for Neutron-Induced Fission ofU235
journal, April 1962


Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for (n, xn) cross sections
journal, January 2023

  • Vanhoy, Jeffrey R.; Haight, Robert C.; Hicks, Sally F.
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2023019

Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for total neutron cross-section observables
journal, January 2023

  • Lewis, Amanda M.; Carlson, Allan D.; Smith, Donald L.
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2023018

Template for estimating uncertainties of measured neutron-induced fission cross-sections
journal, January 2018

  • Neudecker, Denise; Hejnal, Brooke; Tovesson, Fredrik
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 4
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018026

The average number of prompt neutrons , from neutron induced fission of 235U between 0.2 and 1.4 MeV
journal, January 1976


Mean number of neutrons emitted in U235 fission induced by 14.8-Mev neutrons
journal, April 1958

  • Protopopov, A. N.; Blinov, M. V.
  • The Soviet Journal of Atomic Energy, Vol. 4, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01880577

Uncertainty-driven nuclear data evaluation including thermal (n, α ) applied to 59 Ni
journal, November 2017


The Need for Precise and Well-documented Experimental Data on Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra from Neutron-induced Fission of 239Pu
journal, January 2016


Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for prompt fission neutron spectra
journal, January 2023

  • Neudecker, Denise; Devlin, Matthew; Haight, Robert C.
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2023013

Energy dependence of for neutron-induced fission of 235U, 238U and 239Pu from 1·3 to 15 MeV
journal, May 1969


Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced capture and charged-particle production cross section observables
journal, January 2023

  • Lewis, Amanda M.; Neudecker, Denise; Carlson, Allan D.
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2023015

The energy dependence of for 233U, 235U and 239Pu below 5·0 MeV
journal, August 1971


Dealing with Uncertainties
book, January 2009


Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities
journal, January 2023

  • Neudecker, Denise; Carlson, Allan D.; Croft, Stephen
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2023016

Figures / Tables found in this record:

    Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.