DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land

Abstract

Growing dedicated bioenergy crops on marginal land can provide beneficial outcomes including biomass production and energy, resource management, and ecosystem services. We investigated the effects of harvest timing (peak standing crop [PEAK] or after killing frost [KF]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N ha-1) on yield, nutrient concentrations, and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses on a wet marginal land. We evaluated three monocultures, including switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L., SW), Miscanthus x giganteus (MG), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link, PCG), and a polyculture mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula Torr., MIX). Increasing the application of N did correlate with increased biomass, concentration, and subsequent removal of nutrients across almost all treatment combinations. In all grass treatments except MG, PEAK harvesting increased yield and nutrient removal. At PEAK harvest, switchgrass is ideal for optimizing both biomass production and nutrient removal. While our results also suggest short-term plasticity for farmers when selecting harvest timing for optimal nutrient removal, KF harvest is recommended to ensure long-term stand longevity and adequate nutrient removal. If the KF harvest is adopted, MG would be the ideal option for optimizing biomassmore » yield potential. Additionally, we found that the yield of polyculture did not vary much with harvest timing, suggesting better yield stability. Future studies should give consideration for long-term evaluation of polyculture mixtures to assess their biomass yields and nutrient removal capacities.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)
  2. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1976746
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0008521
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
BioEnergy Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 16; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1939-1234
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; nitrogen; removal; harvest timing; perennial grass; vegetative buffer; bioenergy crops; marginal land

Citation Formats

Cooney, Danielle R., Namoi, Nictor, Zumpf, Colleen, Lim, Soo-Hyun, Villamil, Maria, Mitchell, Robert, and Lee, D. K. Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1007/s12155-022-10488-0.
Cooney, Danielle R., Namoi, Nictor, Zumpf, Colleen, Lim, Soo-Hyun, Villamil, Maria, Mitchell, Robert, & Lee, D. K. Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land. United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10488-0
Cooney, Danielle R., Namoi, Nictor, Zumpf, Colleen, Lim, Soo-Hyun, Villamil, Maria, Mitchell, Robert, and Lee, D. K. Sat . "Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land". United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10488-0. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1976746.
@article{osti_1976746,
title = {Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land},
author = {Cooney, Danielle R. and Namoi, Nictor and Zumpf, Colleen and Lim, Soo-Hyun and Villamil, Maria and Mitchell, Robert and Lee, D. K.},
abstractNote = {Growing dedicated bioenergy crops on marginal land can provide beneficial outcomes including biomass production and energy, resource management, and ecosystem services. We investigated the effects of harvest timing (peak standing crop [PEAK] or after killing frost [KF]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N ha-1) on yield, nutrient concentrations, and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses on a wet marginal land. We evaluated three monocultures, including switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L., SW), Miscanthus x giganteus (MG), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link, PCG), and a polyculture mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula Torr., MIX). Increasing the application of N did correlate with increased biomass, concentration, and subsequent removal of nutrients across almost all treatment combinations. In all grass treatments except MG, PEAK harvesting increased yield and nutrient removal. At PEAK harvest, switchgrass is ideal for optimizing both biomass production and nutrient removal. While our results also suggest short-term plasticity for farmers when selecting harvest timing for optimal nutrient removal, KF harvest is recommended to ensure long-term stand longevity and adequate nutrient removal. If the KF harvest is adopted, MG would be the ideal option for optimizing biomass yield potential. Additionally, we found that the yield of polyculture did not vary much with harvest timing, suggesting better yield stability. Future studies should give consideration for long-term evaluation of polyculture mixtures to assess their biomass yields and nutrient removal capacities.},
doi = {10.1007/s12155-022-10488-0},
journal = {BioEnergy Research},
number = 2,
volume = 16,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jul 23 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Sat Jul 23 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Biomass Yield and Feedstock Quality of Prairie Cordgrass in Response to Seeding Rate, Row Spacing, and Nitrogen Fertilization
journal, November 2017


Environmental implications of using ‘underutilised agricultural land’ for future bioenergy crop production
journal, October 2015


Harvest Time and Nitrogen Fertilization to Improve Bioenergy Feedstock Yield and Quality
journal, January 2014

  • Mohammed, Yesuf Assen; Chen, Chengci; Lee, D. K.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 106, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2013.0272

Nitrogen Fertilization Management of Switchgrass, Miscanthus and Giant Reed: A Review
book, September 2018


Inorganic N addition replaces N supplied to switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum ) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
journal, January 2020

  • Jach‐Smith, Laura C.; Jackson, Randall D.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 30, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.2047

Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Field-Scale Integration of Willow into a Continuous Corn Rotation System
journal, January 2017

  • Zumpf, Colleen; Ssegane, Herbert; Negri, Maria Cristina
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 46, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.02.0082

Ethanol production potential from conservation buffers in the inland Pacific Northwest
journal, September 2016

  • Williams, John D.; Robertson, Dave S.; Long, Dan S.
  • Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4962414

Strategic deployment of riparian buffers and windbreaks in Europe can co-deliver biomass and environmental benefits
journal, August 2021

  • Englund, Oskar; Börjesson, Pål; Mola-Yudego, Blas
  • Communications Earth & Environment, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s43247-021-00247-y

Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum
journal, August 2009


The older plant gets the sun: Age‐related changes in Miscanthus × giganteus phenology
journal, September 2020

  • Tejera, Mauricio D.; Miguez, Fernando E.; Heaton, Emily A.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12745

Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois
journal, May 2019

  • Zumpf, Colleen; Lee, Moon‐Sub; Thapa, Santanu
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12627

Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review
journal, June 2017

  • Ferrarini, Andrea; Serra, Paolo; Almagro, María
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 73
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052

Seasonal Changes in Shoot and Root Nitrogen Distribution in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum)
journal, August 2013


Biomass Production in Switchgrass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield
journal, January 2010

  • Wullschleger, S. D.; Davis, E. B.; Borsuk, M. E.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 102, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0087

Marginal Lands to Grow Novel Bio-Based Crops: A Plant Breeding Perspective
journal, March 2020


Miscanthus × giganteus Responses to Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvest Timing in Illinois, USA
journal, January 2021


Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment
journal, June 2006

  • Tilman, David; Reich, Peter B.; Knops, Johannes M. H.
  • Nature, Vol. 441, Issue 7093
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature04742

Senescence, dormancy and tillering in perennial C4 grasses
journal, March 2014


Frequency Grid: A Simple Tool for Measuring Grassland Establishment
journal, November 2001

  • Vogel, Kenneth P.; Masters, Robert A.
  • Journal of Range Management, Vol. 54, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2307/4003666

Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus
journal, September 2008


Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
journal, October 2001


Switchgrass for forage and bioenergy: harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition
journal, April 2010


Switchgrass and Soil Carbon Sequestration Response to Ammonium Nitrate, Manure, and Harvest Frequency on Conservation Reserve Program Land
journal, January 2007


Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
journal, January 2015

  • Bates, Douglas; Mächler, Martin; Bolker, Ben
  • Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 67, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Nitrogen Reserve Pools in Two Miscanthus × giganteus Genotypes under Contrasting N Managements
journal, September 2017

  • Dierking, Ryan M.; Allen, Damian J.; Cunningham, Suzanne M.
  • Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 8
  • DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01618

Miscanthus × giganteus leaf senescence, decomposition and C and N inputs to soil
journal, October 2012


Low variation in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal associations and effects on biomass among switchgrass cultivars
journal, December 2018


Biomass Yield and Nutrient Removal Rates of Perennial Grasses under Nitrogen Fertilization
journal, November 2011


Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Phosphorus Uptake in Bermudagrass Forage Grown on High Soil-Test Phosphorus Sites
journal, April 2004


Biofuels from perennial energy crops on buffer strips: A win-win strategy
journal, May 2021


Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies
journal, March 2012


Grass-Legume Mixtures for Improved Soil Health in Cultivated Agroecosystem
journal, August 2018


Beyond nutrients: a meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils
journal, June 2017

  • Delavaux, Camille S.; Smith-Ramesh, Lauren M.; Kuebbing, Sara E.
  • Ecology, Vol. 98, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1892

Yield of Native Warm‐Season Grasses in Response to Nitrogen and Harvest Frequency
journal, January 2019


Switchgrass nitrogen response and estimated production costs on diverse sites
journal, April 2017

  • Fike, John H.; Pease, James W.; Owens, Vance N.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12444

Multifunctional perennial production systems for bioenergy: performance and progress
journal, May 2020

  • Englund, Oskar; Dimitriou, Ioannis; Dale, Virginia H.
  • WIREs Energy and Environment, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/wene.375

Nitrogen Fertilization Does Significantly Increase Yields of Stands of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum in Multiyear Trials in Illinois
journal, October 2013

  • Arundale, Rebecca A.; Dohleman, Frank G.; Voigt, Thomas B.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-013-9385-5

The role of mycorrhizal associations in plant potassium nutrition
journal, July 2014


Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota
journal, January 2006


The extent of mycorrhizal colonization of roots and its influence on plant growth and phosphorus content
journal, March 2013


Nitrogen fertility and harvest management of switchgrass for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production in Illinois
journal, July 2013


Responsiveness of miscanthus and switchgrass yields to stand age and nitrogen fertilization: A meta‐regression analysis
journal, March 2022

  • Sharma, Bijay P.; Zhang, Na; Lee, DoKyoung
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 14, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12929

The economics of growing shrub willow as a bioenergy buffer on agricultural fields: A case study in the Midwest Corn Belt: Shrub Willow Economics
journal, August 2016

  • Ssegane, Herbert; Zumpf, Colleen; Cristina Negri, M.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1679

Switchgrass Harvest Time Management Can Impact Biomass Yield and Nutrient Content
journal, January 2016


Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA
journal, November 2018


Fungal Symbionts Alter Plant Drought Response
journal, December 2012

  • Worchel, Elise R.; Giauque, Hannah E.; Kivlin, Stephanie N.
  • Microbial Ecology, Vol. 65, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00248-012-0151-6

Crop Species Diversity Affects Productivity and Weed Suppression in Perennial Polycultures under Two Management Strategies
journal, January 2008


Monitoring switchgrass composition to optimize harvesting periods for bioenergy and value-added products
journal, September 2013


Aerial Imagery Can Detect Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects on Biomass and Stand Health of Miscanthus × giganteus
journal, March 2022

  • Namoi, Nictor; Jang, Chunhwa; Robins, Zachary
  • Remote Sensing, Vol. 14, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs14061435

Comparing Biomass Yields of Low-Input High-Diversity Communities with Managed Monocultures Across the Central United States
journal, April 2010

  • Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V.; Kiniry, James R.; Sanchez, Homer
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-010-9094-2

Effect of nitrogen addition on Miscanthus  ×  giganteus yield, nitrogen losses, and soil organic matter across five sites
journal, August 2014

  • Davis, Morgan P.; David, Mark B.; Voigt, Thomas B.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12217

Plant species composition and biofuel yields of conservation grasslands
journal, December 2009

  • Adler, Paul R.; Sanderson, Matt A.; Weimer, Paul J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 19, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1890/07-2094.1

Growth and agronomy of Miscanthus x giganteus for biomass production
journal, January 2011

  • Anderson, Eric; Arundale, Rebecca; Maughan, Matthew
  • Biofuels, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4155/bfs.10.80