DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois

Abstract

Abstract The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm‐season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus , two switchgrass cultivars ( Panicum virgatum L .), prairie cordgrass ( Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem ( Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass ( Sorghastrum nutans ), and sideoats grama ( Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declinedmore » over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois
  2. Department of Agronomy University of Florida Gainesville Florida
  3. USDA/ARS Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research Unit Lincoln Nebraska
  4. Department of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1559353
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1559355
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Volume: 11 Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Zumpf, Colleen, Lee, Moon‐Sub, Thapa, Santanu, Guo, Jia, Mitchell, Rob, Volenec, Jeffrey J., and Lee, DoKyoung. Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois. United Kingdom: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12627.
Zumpf, Colleen, Lee, Moon‐Sub, Thapa, Santanu, Guo, Jia, Mitchell, Rob, Volenec, Jeffrey J., & Lee, DoKyoung. Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12627
Zumpf, Colleen, Lee, Moon‐Sub, Thapa, Santanu, Guo, Jia, Mitchell, Rob, Volenec, Jeffrey J., and Lee, DoKyoung. Mon . "Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12627.
@article{osti_1559353,
title = {Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois},
author = {Zumpf, Colleen and Lee, Moon‐Sub and Thapa, Santanu and Guo, Jia and Mitchell, Rob and Volenec, Jeffrey J. and Lee, DoKyoung},
abstractNote = {Abstract The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm‐season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus , two switchgrass cultivars ( Panicum virgatum L .), prairie cordgrass ( Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem ( Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass ( Sorghastrum nutans ), and sideoats grama ( Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12627},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 10,
volume = 11,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Mon Jun 24 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Mon Jun 24 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12627

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges
journal, January 2013


The feasibility of switchgrass for biofuel production
journal, January 2012

  • Mitchell, Rob; Vogel, Kenneth P.; Uden, Daniel R.
  • Biofuels, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4155/bfs.11.153

A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors
journal, February 2010


Estimating Available Abandoned Cropland in the United States: Possibilities for Energy Crop Production
journal, April 2017


Nitrogen and harvest date affect developmental morphology and biomass yield of warm-season grasses
journal, August 2013

  • Waramit, Naroon; Moore, Kenneth J.; Heaton, Emily
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12086

Yield Potential and Nitrogen Requirements of × on Eroded Soil
journal, January 2017


A Novel Framework to Classify Marginal Land for Sustainable Biomass Feedstock Production
journal, January 2011

  • Gopalakrishnan, Gayathri; Cristina Negri, M.; Snyder, Seth W.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 40, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0539

The Concept of Marginal Land
journal, April 1932

  • Peterson, G. M.; Galbraith, J. K.
  • Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2307/1230112

Switchgrass production for the upper southeastern USA: Influence of cultivar and cutting frequency on biomass yields
journal, March 2006


Assessing multimetric aspects of sustainability: Application to a bioenergy crop production system in East Tennessee
journal, February 2016

  • Parish, Esther S.; Dale, Virginia H.; English, Burton C.
  • Ecosphere, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1206

Registration of ‘Shawnee‘ Switchgrass
journal, January 1996


Soil Properties Associated with Landscape Position
journal, January 1993


Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota
journal, January 2006


Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA
journal, February 2008


Stress-Tolerant Feedstocks for Sustainable Bioenergy Production on Marginal Land
journal, February 2015


Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands
journal, March 2018


Senescence, dormancy and tillering in perennial C4 grasses
journal, March 2014


The economics of growing shrub willow as a bioenergy buffer on agricultural fields: A case study in the Midwest Corn Belt: Shrub Willow Economics
journal, August 2016

  • Ssegane, Herbert; Zumpf, Colleen; Cristina Negri, M.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1679

In-field direct combustion fuel property changes of switchgrass harvested from summer to fall
journal, March 2010


Switchgrass Harvest Time Management Can Impact Biomass Yield and Nutrient Content
journal, January 2016


Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA
journal, November 2018


Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
journal, January 2013

  • Gelfand, Ilya; Sahajpal, Ritvik; Zhang, Xuesong
  • Nature, Vol. 493, Issue 7433
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11811

and Switchgrass Production in Central Illinois: Impacts on Hydrology and Inorganic Nitrogen Leaching
journal, January 2010

  • McIsaac, Gregory F.; David, Mark B.; Illinois, Corey A. Mitchell University of
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 39, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0497

The yield and quality response of the energy grass Miscanthus × giganteus to fertiliser applications of nitrogen, potassium and sulphur
journal, September 2014


Biomass Production of Switchgrass in Central South Dakota
journal, January 2005


Frequency Grid: A Simple Tool for Measuring Grassland Establishment
journal, November 2001

  • Vogel, Kenneth P.; Masters, Robert A.
  • Journal of Range Management, Vol. 54, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2307/4003666

Estimates of Biomass Yield for Perennial Bioenergy Grasses in the USA
journal, November 2014


Effect of nitrogen addition on Miscanthus  ×  giganteus yield, nitrogen losses, and soil organic matter across five sites
journal, August 2014

  • Davis, Morgan P.; David, Mark B.; Voigt, Thomas B.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12217

Establishing and managing perennial grasses for bioenergy
conference, December 2013

  • Mitchell, Rob
  • Proceedings of the 24th Annual Integrated Crop Management Conference, Proceedings of the Integrated Crop Management Conference
  • DOI: 10.31274/icm-180809-114

Impact of land classification on potential warm season grass biomass production in Ontario, Canada
journal, March 2013

  • Kludze, Hilla; Deen, Bill; Weersink, Alfons
  • Canadian Journal of Plant Science, Vol. 93, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.4141/cjps2012-143