DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)

Abstract

In 2019, the eROSITA telescope on board the Russian-German satellite Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) began to perform a deep all-sky X-ray survey with the aim of identifying ~100 000 clusters and groups over the course of four years. As part of its performance verification phase, a ~140 deg2 survey, called eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), was performed. With a depth typical of the all-sky survey after four years, it allows tests of tools and methods as well as improved predictions for the all-sky survey. As part of this effort, a catalog of 542 X-ray selected galaxy group and cluster candidates was compiled. Here, in this paper, we present the optical follow-up, with the aim of providing redshifts and cluster confirmation for the full sample. Furthermore, we aim to provide additional information on the dynamical state, richness, and optical center of the clusters. Finally, we aim to evaluate the impact of optical cluster confirmation on the purity and completeness of the X-ray selected sample. We used optical imaging data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program and from the Legacy Survey to identify optical counterparts to the X-ray detected cluster candidates. We make use of the multi-component matched filter cluster confirmation tool (MCMF),more » as well as of the optical cluster finder CAMIRA to derive cluster redshifts and richnesses. MCMF provided the probabilities with which an optical structure would be a chance superposition with the X-ray candidate. These probabilities were used to identify the best optical counterpart as well as to confirm an X-ray candidate as a cluster. The impact of this confirmation process on catalog purity and completeness was estimated using optical to X-ray scaling relations as well as simulations. The resulting catalog was furthermore matched with public group and cluster catalogs. Optical estimators of the cluster dynamical state were constructed based on density maps of the red-sequence galaxies at the cluster redshift. By providing redshift estimates for all 542 candidates, we construct an optically confirmed sample of 477 clusters and groups with a residual contamination of 6%. Of these, 470 (98.5%) are confirmed using MCMF, and 7 systems are added through cross-matching with spectroscopic group catalogs. Using observable-to-observable scaling and the applied confirmation threshold, we predict that 8 ± 2 real systems have been excluded with the MCMF cut required to build this low-contamination sample. This number agrees well with the 7 systems found through cross-matching that were not confirmed with MCMF. The predicted redshift and mass distribution of this catalog agree well with simulations. Thus, we expect that these 477 systems include >99% of all true clusters in the candidate list. Using an MCMF-independent method, we confirm that the catalog contamination of the confirmed subsample is 6 ± 3%. Application of the same method to the full candidate list yields 17 ± 3%, consistent with estimates coming from the fraction of confirmed systems of ~17% and with expectations from simulations of ~20%. We also present a sample of merging cluster candidates based on the derived estimators of the cluster dynamical state.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [1];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [6];  [7];  [4];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12] more »;  [4];  [13] « less
  1. Ludwig Maximilian Univ. of Munich, Munich (Germany)
  2. Univ. of Tokyo (Japan)
  3. Ludwig Maximilian Univ. of Munich, Munich (Germany); Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching (Germany)
  4. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching (Germany)
  5. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching (Germany); Exzellenzcluster ORIGINS (Germany)
  6. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. (China); Academia Sinica, Taipei (Taiwan)
  7. Univ. of Toulouse (France); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (France)
  8. Univ. of Tokyo (Japan); Nagoya Univ. (Japan)
  9. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (Japan); Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) (Japan)
  10. Hiroshima Univ. (Japan)
  11. Univ. of Bonn (Germany); Nara Women’s University (Japan)
  12. Univ. of Bonn (Germany)
  13. Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, WA (Australia)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); National Science Foundation (NSF); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
OSTI Identifier:
1982283
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; AST-1238877; AST-0950945; NNX08AR22G
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 661; Journal ID: ISSN 0004-6361
Publisher:
EDP Sciences
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; catalogs; galaxy clusters; redshifts

Citation Formats

Klein, M., Oguri, M., Mohr, J. J., Grandis, S., Ghirardini, V., Liu, T., Liu, A., Bulbul, E., Wolf, J., Comparat, J., Ramos-Ceja, M. E., Buchner, J., Chiu, I., Clerc, N., Merloni, A., Miyatake, H., Miyazaki, S., Okabe, N., Ota, N., Pacaud, F., Salvato, M., and Driver, S. P. The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS). United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141123.
Klein, M., Oguri, M., Mohr, J. J., Grandis, S., Ghirardini, V., Liu, T., Liu, A., Bulbul, E., Wolf, J., Comparat, J., Ramos-Ceja, M. E., Buchner, J., Chiu, I., Clerc, N., Merloni, A., Miyatake, H., Miyazaki, S., Okabe, N., Ota, N., Pacaud, F., Salvato, M., & Driver, S. P. The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS). United States. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141123
Klein, M., Oguri, M., Mohr, J. J., Grandis, S., Ghirardini, V., Liu, T., Liu, A., Bulbul, E., Wolf, J., Comparat, J., Ramos-Ceja, M. E., Buchner, J., Chiu, I., Clerc, N., Merloni, A., Miyatake, H., Miyazaki, S., Okabe, N., Ota, N., Pacaud, F., Salvato, M., and Driver, S. P. Wed . "The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)". United States. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141123. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1982283.
@article{osti_1982283,
title = {The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)},
author = {Klein, M. and Oguri, M. and Mohr, J. J. and Grandis, S. and Ghirardini, V. and Liu, T. and Liu, A. and Bulbul, E. and Wolf, J. and Comparat, J. and Ramos-Ceja, M. E. and Buchner, J. and Chiu, I. and Clerc, N. and Merloni, A. and Miyatake, H. and Miyazaki, S. and Okabe, N. and Ota, N. and Pacaud, F. and Salvato, M. and Driver, S. P.},
abstractNote = {In 2019, the eROSITA telescope on board the Russian-German satellite Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) began to perform a deep all-sky X-ray survey with the aim of identifying ~100 000 clusters and groups over the course of four years. As part of its performance verification phase, a ~140 deg2 survey, called eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), was performed. With a depth typical of the all-sky survey after four years, it allows tests of tools and methods as well as improved predictions for the all-sky survey. As part of this effort, a catalog of 542 X-ray selected galaxy group and cluster candidates was compiled. Here, in this paper, we present the optical follow-up, with the aim of providing redshifts and cluster confirmation for the full sample. Furthermore, we aim to provide additional information on the dynamical state, richness, and optical center of the clusters. Finally, we aim to evaluate the impact of optical cluster confirmation on the purity and completeness of the X-ray selected sample. We used optical imaging data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program and from the Legacy Survey to identify optical counterparts to the X-ray detected cluster candidates. We make use of the multi-component matched filter cluster confirmation tool (MCMF), as well as of the optical cluster finder CAMIRA to derive cluster redshifts and richnesses. MCMF provided the probabilities with which an optical structure would be a chance superposition with the X-ray candidate. These probabilities were used to identify the best optical counterpart as well as to confirm an X-ray candidate as a cluster. The impact of this confirmation process on catalog purity and completeness was estimated using optical to X-ray scaling relations as well as simulations. The resulting catalog was furthermore matched with public group and cluster catalogs. Optical estimators of the cluster dynamical state were constructed based on density maps of the red-sequence galaxies at the cluster redshift. By providing redshift estimates for all 542 candidates, we construct an optically confirmed sample of 477 clusters and groups with a residual contamination of 6%. Of these, 470 (98.5%) are confirmed using MCMF, and 7 systems are added through cross-matching with spectroscopic group catalogs. Using observable-to-observable scaling and the applied confirmation threshold, we predict that 8 ± 2 real systems have been excluded with the MCMF cut required to build this low-contamination sample. This number agrees well with the 7 systems found through cross-matching that were not confirmed with MCMF. The predicted redshift and mass distribution of this catalog agree well with simulations. Thus, we expect that these 477 systems include >99% of all true clusters in the candidate list. Using an MCMF-independent method, we confirm that the catalog contamination of the confirmed subsample is 6 ± 3%. Application of the same method to the full candidate list yields 17 ± 3%, consistent with estimates coming from the fraction of confirmed systems of ~17% and with expectations from simulations of ~20%. We also present a sample of merging cluster candidates based on the derived estimators of the cluster dynamical state.},
doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202141123},
journal = {Astronomy and Astrophysics},
number = ,
volume = 661,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed May 18 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Wed May 18 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Second data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program
journal, October 2019

  • Aihara, Hiroaki; AlSayyad, Yusra; Ando, Makoto
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz103

Full-sky photon simulation of clusters and active galactic nuclei in the soft X-rays for eROSITA
journal, December 2020

  • Comparat, Johan; Eckert, Dominique; Finoguenov, Alexis
  • The Open Journal of Astrophysics, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.21105/astro.2008.08404

The nongravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters
journal, March 2015


SExtractor: Software for source extraction
journal, June 1996

  • Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S.
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996164

The structure of star clusters. I. an empirical density law
journal, October 1962


The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters
journal, February 2021

  • Hilton, M.; Sifón, C.; Naess, S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 253, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd023

The Hyper Suprime-Cam software pipeline
journal, October 2017

  • Bosch, James; Armstrong, Robert; Bickerton, Steven
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022


Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds
journal, June 1998

  • Schlegel, David J.; Finkbeiner, Douglas P.; Davis, Marc
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 500, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/305772

Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe
journal, June 2017

  • Blanton, Michael R.; Bershady, Matthew A.; Abolfathi, Bela
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 154, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567

Substructure and dynamical state of 2092 rich clusters of galaxies derived from photometric data
journal, September 2013

  • Wen, Z. L.; Han, J. L.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 436, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1581

A weak Lensing Study of X-Ray Groups in the Cosmos Survey: form and Evolution of the Mass-Luminosity Relation
journal, December 2009

  • Leauthaud, Alexie; Finoguenov, Alexis; Kneib, Jean-Paul
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 709, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/97

The XXL Survey: II. The bright cluster sample: catalogue and luminosity function⋆⋆⋆
journal, June 2016


The MCXC: a meta-catalogue of x-ray detected clusters of galaxies
journal, October 2011


The eROSITA X-ray telescope on SRG
journal, February 2021


Flux- and volume-limited groups/clusters for the SDSS galaxies: catalogues and mass estimation
journal, May 2014


unWISE: UNBLURRED COADDS OF THE WISE IMAGING
journal, April 2014


The bright-star masks for the HSC-SSP survey
journal, July 2017

  • Coupon, Jean; Czakon, Nicole; Bosch, James
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx047

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022


unWISE Coadds: The Five-year Data Set
journal, November 2019

  • Meisner, A. M.; Lang, D.; Schlafly, E. F.
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 131, Issue 1006
  • DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab3df4

X-Ray Properties of SPT-selected Galaxy Clusters at 0.2 < z < 1.5 Observed with XMM-Newton
journal, January 2019


Galaxy morphology in rich clusters - Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies
journal, March 1980

  • Dressler, A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 236
  • DOI: 10.1086/157753

The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field: Statistical Properties of Clusters of Galaxies
journal, September 2007

  • Finoguenov, A.; Guzzo, L.; Hasinger, G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/516577

Planck 2015 results : XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts
journal, September 2016


The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022


Cosmological constraints from CODEX galaxy clusters spectroscopically confirmed by SDSS-IV/SPIDERS DR16
journal, October 2020

  • Ider Chitham, J.; Comparat, J.; Finoguenov, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 499, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3044

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022


CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS
journal, February 2009


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing
journal, July 2020


Galaxy Groups: a 2mass Catalog
journal, April 2015


A New Method For Galaxy Cluster Detection. I. The Algorithm
journal, October 2000

  • Gladders, Michael D.; Yee, H. K. C.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 120, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1086/301557

A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter
journal, August 2006

  • Clowe, Douglas; Bradač, Maruša; Gonzalez, Anthony H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 648, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/508162

CODEX clusters: Survey, catalog, and cosmology of the X-ray luminosity function
journal, June 2020


Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies
journal, February 1996

  • Moore, Ben; Katz, Neal; Lake, George
  • Nature, Vol. 379, Issue 6566
  • DOI: 10.1038/379613a0

The XXL Survey: XX. The 365 cluster catalogue★★★
journal, November 2018


Planck 2015 results : XXVII. The second
journal, September 2016


Calibration of the Optical mass Proxy for Clusters of Galaxies and an Update of the Whl12 Cluster Catalog
journal, July 2015


A new RASS galaxy cluster catalogue with low contamination extending to z ∼ 1 in the DES overlap region
journal, May 2019

  • Klein, M.; Grandis, S.; Mohr, J. J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1463

A clustering-based self-calibration of the richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters out to z ≈ 1.1 in the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey
journal, August 2020

  • Chiu, I-Non; Okumura, Teppei; Oguri, Masamune
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2440

The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rykoff, E. S.; Rozo, E.; Hollowood, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/1

The eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022


A cluster finding algorithm based on the multiband identification of red sequence galaxies
journal, August 2014

  • Oguri, Masamune
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 444, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1446

The 2mass Redshift Survey—Description and data Release
journal, March 2012

  • Huchra, John P.; Macri, Lucas M.; Masters, Karen L.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 199, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/26

Understanding X-ray and optical selection of galaxy clusters: a comparison of the XXL and CAMIRA cluster catalogues obtained in the common XXL-HSC SSP area
journal, March 2021

  • Willis, J. P.; Oguri, M.; Ramos-Ceja, M. E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 503, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab873

The ROSAT mission
journal, January 1982


The richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters from weak-lensing magnification in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey
journal, April 2020

  • Chiu, I-Non; Umetsu, Keiichi; Murata, Ryoma
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 495, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1158

Halo concentration, galaxy red fraction, and gas properties of optically defined merging clusters†
journal, July 2019

  • Okabe, Nobuhiro; Oguri, Masamune; Akamatsu, Hiroki
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 71, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz059

The Evolution of X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies
journal, September 2002


Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
journal, September 2011


Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
journal, April 2019

  • Dey, Arjun; Schlegel, David J.; Lang, Dustin
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 157, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY MaxBCG CLUSTER CATALOG
journal, December 2009


Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
journal, October 2003


Particle Acceleration on Megaparsec Scales in a Merging Galaxy Cluster
journal, September 2010


Finding counterparts for all-sky X-ray surveys with Nway: a Bayesian algorithm for cross-matching multiple catalogues
journal, October 2017

  • Salvato, M.; Buchner, J.; Budavári, T.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 473, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2651

An optical catalog of galaxy clusters obtained from an adaptive matched filter finder applied to SDSS DR9 data
journal, January 2018


The mass–richness relation of optically selected clusters from weak gravitational lensing and abundance with Subaru HSC first-year data
journal, September 2019

  • Murata, Ryoma; Oguri, Masamune; Nishimichi, Takahiro
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 71, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz092

GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation
journal, October 2009


redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Abate, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 461, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1281

A multicomponent matched filter cluster confirmation tool for eROSITA: initial application to the RASS and DES-SV data sets
journal, November 2017

  • Klein, M.; Mohr, J. J.; Desai, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2929

Validation of selection function, sample contamination and mass calibration in galaxy cluster samples
journal, August 2020

  • Grandis, S.; Klein, M.; Mohr, J. J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2333

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
journal, May 2022