DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models

Abstract

We present a simple and powerful technique for finding a good error model for a quantum processor. The technique iteratively tests a nested sequence of models against data obtained from the processor, and keeps track of the best-fit model and its wildcard error (a metric of the amount of unmodeled error) at each step. Each best-fit model, along with a quantification of its unmodeled error, constitutes a characterization of the processor. We explain how quantum processor models can be compared with experimental data and to each other. We demonstrate the technique by using it to characterize a simulated noisy two-qubit processor.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)
OSTI Identifier:
1828015
Report Number(s):
SAND-2021-11006J
Journal ID: ISSN 1367-2630; 699163; TRN: US2215988
Grant/Contract Number:  
NA0003525
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
New Journal of Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 23; Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1367-2630
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS

Citation Formats

Nielsen, Erik, Rudinger, Kenneth, Proctor, Timothy, Young, Kevin, and Blume-Kohout, Robin. Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac20b9.
Nielsen, Erik, Rudinger, Kenneth, Proctor, Timothy, Young, Kevin, & Blume-Kohout, Robin. Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac20b9
Nielsen, Erik, Rudinger, Kenneth, Proctor, Timothy, Young, Kevin, and Blume-Kohout, Robin. Mon . "Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac20b9. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1828015.
@article{osti_1828015,
title = {Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models},
author = {Nielsen, Erik and Rudinger, Kenneth and Proctor, Timothy and Young, Kevin and Blume-Kohout, Robin},
abstractNote = {We present a simple and powerful technique for finding a good error model for a quantum processor. The technique iteratively tests a nested sequence of models against data obtained from the processor, and keeps track of the best-fit model and its wildcard error (a metric of the amount of unmodeled error) at each step. Each best-fit model, along with a quantification of its unmodeled error, constitutes a characterization of the processor. We explain how quantum processor models can be compared with experimental data and to each other. We demonstrate the technique by using it to characterize a simulated noisy two-qubit processor.},
doi = {10.1088/1367-2630/ac20b9},
journal = {New Journal of Physics},
number = 9,
volume = 23,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Sep 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Mon Sep 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Quantum computers
journal, March 2010


Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
journal, August 2018


Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information
journal, January 1978


Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
journal, February 2017

  • Blume-Kohout, Robin; Gamble, John King; Nielsen, Erik
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14485

Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
journal, April 2018


Quantum process identification: a method for characterizing non-markovian quantum dynamics
journal, August 2019


The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses
journal, March 1938


A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures
journal, February 2009

  • Bretz, Frank; Maurer, Willi; Brannath, Werner
  • Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 28, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/sim.3495

Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers
dataset, January 2021


Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes
journal, September 2007


Operational, gauge-free quantum tomography
journal, November 2020


Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors
journal, September 2020


Quantum certification and benchmarking
journal, June 2020


Detecting and tracking drift in quantum information processors
journal, October 2020


The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation
journal, September 2000


Probing quantum processor performance with pyGSTi
journal, July 2020

  • Nielsen, Erik; Rudinger, Kenneth; Proctor, Timothy
  • Quantum Science and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ab8aa4

Self-consistent quantum process tomography
journal, June 2013


Detecting and tracking drift in quantum information processors
text, January 2019


Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers
text, January 2020


Wildcard error: Quantifying unmodeled errors in quantum processors
preprint, January 2020


A taxonomy of small Markovian errors
text, January 2021


Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers
dataset, January 2021