Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning
Abstract
Understanding and predicting divertor heat-load width λq is a critically important problem for an easier and more robust operation of ITER with high fusion gain. Previous predictive simulation data for λq using the extreme-scale edge gyrokinetic code XGC1 [S. Ku et al., Phys. Plasmas 25, 056107 (2018)] in the electrostatic limit under attached divertor plasma conditions in three major US tokamaks [C. S. Chang et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 116023 (2017)] reproduced the Eich and Goldston attached-divertor formula results [formula #14 in T. Eich et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, 093031 (2013) and R. J. Goldston, Nucl. Fusion 52, 013009 (2012)] and furthermore predicted over six times wider λq than the maximal Eich and Goldston formula predictions on a full-power (Q = 10) scenario ITER plasma. After adding data from further predictive simulations on a highest current JET and highest-current Alcator C-Mod, a machine learning program is used to identify a new scaling formula for λq as a simple modification to the Eich formula #14, which reproduces the Eich scaling formula for the present tokamaks and which embraces the wide λqXGC for the full-current Q = 10 ITER plasma. Additionally, the new formula is then successfully tested on three more ITERmore »
- Authors:
-
- Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
- Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States). Plasma Science and Fusion Center
- Technische Univ. Wien, Vienna (Austria). Atominstitut
- ITER Organization, St. Paul Lez Durance (France)
- Culham Science Centre, Abingdon (United Kingdom). Culham Centre for Fusion Energy (CCFE), EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1780827
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1763840
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC02-09CH11466; DEAC02-09CH11466
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Physics of Plasmas
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 28; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1070-664X
- Publisher:
- American Institute of Physics (AIP)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; Plasma turbulence particle-in-cell method; plasma confinement; machine learning; plasma instabilities; computer simulation; tokamaks
Citation Formats
Chang, C. S., Ku, S., Hager, R., Churchill, R. M., Hughes, J., Köchl, F., Loarte, A., Parail, V., and Pitts, R. A. Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning. United States: N. p., 2021.
Web. doi:10.1063/5.0027637.
Chang, C. S., Ku, S., Hager, R., Churchill, R. M., Hughes, J., Köchl, F., Loarte, A., Parail, V., & Pitts, R. A. Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning. United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0027637
Chang, C. S., Ku, S., Hager, R., Churchill, R. M., Hughes, J., Köchl, F., Loarte, A., Parail, V., and Pitts, R. A. Mon .
"Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning". United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0027637. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1780827.
@article{osti_1780827,
title = {Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning},
author = {Chang, C. S. and Ku, S. and Hager, R. and Churchill, R. M. and Hughes, J. and Köchl, F. and Loarte, A. and Parail, V. and Pitts, R. A.},
abstractNote = {Understanding and predicting divertor heat-load width λq is a critically important problem for an easier and more robust operation of ITER with high fusion gain. Previous predictive simulation data for λq using the extreme-scale edge gyrokinetic code XGC1 [S. Ku et al., Phys. Plasmas 25, 056107 (2018)] in the electrostatic limit under attached divertor plasma conditions in three major US tokamaks [C. S. Chang et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 116023 (2017)] reproduced the Eich and Goldston attached-divertor formula results [formula #14 in T. Eich et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, 093031 (2013) and R. J. Goldston, Nucl. Fusion 52, 013009 (2012)] and furthermore predicted over six times wider λq than the maximal Eich and Goldston formula predictions on a full-power (Q = 10) scenario ITER plasma. After adding data from further predictive simulations on a highest current JET and highest-current Alcator C-Mod, a machine learning program is used to identify a new scaling formula for λq as a simple modification to the Eich formula #14, which reproduces the Eich scaling formula for the present tokamaks and which embraces the wide λqXGC for the full-current Q = 10 ITER plasma. Additionally, the new formula is then successfully tested on three more ITER plasmas: two corresponding to long burning scenarios with Q = 5 and one at low plasma current to be explored in the initial phases of ITER operation. The new physics that gives rise to the wider λqXGC is identified to be the weakly collisional, trapped-electron-mode turbulence across the magnetic separatrix, which is known to be an efficient transporter of the electron heat and mass. Electromagnetic turbulence and high-collisionality effects on the new formula are the next study topics for XGC1.},
doi = {10.1063/5.0027637},
journal = {Physics of Plasmas},
number = 2,
volume = 28,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}
Works referenced in this record:
A fast low-to-high confinement mode bifurcation dynamics in the boundary-plasma gyrokinetic code XGC1
journal, May 2018
- Ku, S.; Chang, C. S.; Hager, R.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 5
Simulations of tokamak boundary plasma turbulence transport in setting the divertor heat flux width
journal, October 2019
- Xu, X. Q.; Li, N. M.; Li, Z. Y.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 59, Issue 12
Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data
journal, April 2009
- Schmidt, Michael; Lipson, Hod
- Science, Vol. 324, Issue 5923
Intrinsic momentum generation by a combined neoclassical and turbulence mechanism in diverted DIII-D plasma edge
journal, September 2014
- Seo, Janghoon; Chang, C. S.; Ku, S.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 9
The radial electric field dynamics in the neoclassical plasmas
journal, December 1997
- Novakovskii, S. V.; Liu, C. S.; Sagdeev, R. Z.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 4, Issue 12
Density limits in toroidal plasmas
journal, July 2002
- Greenwald, Martin
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 44, Issue 8
Modelling one-third field operation in the ITER pre-fusion power operation phase
journal, September 2019
- Schneider, M.; Polevoi, A. R.; Kim, S. H.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 59, Issue 12
Inter-ELM Power Decay Length for JET and ASDEX Upgrade: Measurement and Comparison with Heuristic Drift-Based Model
journal, November 2011
- Eich, T.; Sieglin, B.; Scarabosio, A.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 107, Issue 21
Generalized expression for polarization density
journal, June 2009
- Wang, Lu; Hahm, T. S.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 16, Issue 6
Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER
journal, August 2017
- Chang, C. S.; Ku, S.; Loarte, A.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 57, Issue 11
JINTRAC: A System of Codes for Integrated Simulation of Tokamak Scenarios
journal, January 2014
- Romanelli, Michele; Corrigan, Gerard; Parail, Vassili
- Plasma and Fusion Research, Vol. 9, Issue 0
SOLPS-ITER drift modelling of ITER burning plasmas with narrow near-SOL heat flux channels
journal, March 2021
- Veselova, Irina; Kaveeva, Elizaveta; Rozhansky, Vladimir
- Nuclear Materials and Energy, Vol. 26
Heuristic drift-based model of the power scrape-off width in low-gas-puff H-mode tokamaks
journal, December 2011
- Goldston, R. J.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 52, Issue 1
Numerical study of neoclassical plasma pedestal in a tokamak geometry
journal, May 2004
- Chang, C. S.; Ku, Seunghoe; Weitzner, H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, Issue 5
Turbulent Transport of Trapped-Electron Modes in Collisionless Plasmas
journal, August 2009
- Xiao, Yong; Lin, Zhihong
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, Issue 8
Consequences of a reduction of the upstream power SOL width in ITER
journal, July 2013
- Kukushkin, A. S.; Pacher, H. D.; Pacher, G. W.
- Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 438
SOLPS-ITER modelling of ITER edge plasma with drifts and currents
journal, March 2020
- Kaveeva, E.; Rozhansky, V.; Senichenkov, I.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 4
CORSICA modelling of ITER hybrid operation scenarios
journal, August 2016
- Kim, S. H.; Bulmer, R. H.; Campbell, D. J.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 56, Issue 12
Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER
journal, August 2013
- Eich, T.; Leonard, A. W.; Pitts, R. A.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 53, Issue 9
Turbulence driven widening of the near-SOL power width in ASDEX Upgrade H-Mode discharges
journal, April 2020
- Eich, T.; Manz, P.; Goldston, R. J.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 5
Verification and validation for magnetic fusion
journal, May 2010
- Greenwald, Martin
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 17, Issue 5
Confinement and edge studies towards low ρ * and ν * at JET
journal, June 2013
- Nunes, I.; Lomas, P. J.; McDonald, D. C.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 53, Issue 7
A gyrokinetic perspective on the JET-ILW pedestal
journal, January 2017
- Hatch, D. R.; Kotschenreuther, M.; Mahajan, S.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 57, Issue 3
Compressed ion temperature gradient turbulence in diverted tokamak edge
journal, May 2009
- Chang, C. S.; Ku, S.; Diamond, P. H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 16, Issue 5
Phase Space of Tokamak Edge Turbulence, the Transition, and the Formation of the Edge Pedestal
journal, November 1998
- Rogers, B. N.; Drake, J. F.; Zeiler, A.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, Issue 20
Pedestal fueling simulations with a coupled kinetic plasma–kinetic neutral transport code
journal, July 2013
- Stotler, D. P.; Chang, C. S.; Ku, S. H.
- Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 438
Numerical study of collisional ripple diffusion in a tokamak plasma
journal, October 2003
- Park, Gunyoung; Chang, C. S.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 10, Issue 10
Zonal flows in plasma—a review
journal, April 2005
- Diamond, P. H.; Itoh, S-I; Itoh, K.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 47, Issue 5
The nonlinear drift wave instability and its role in tokamak edge turbulence
journal, July 2002
- Scott, Bruce D.
- New Journal of Physics, Vol. 4
Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems
journal, April 1976
- Hinton, F. L.; Hazeltine, R. D.
- Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 48, Issue 2
High-resolution heat flux width measurements at reactor-level magnetic fields and observation of a unified width scaling across confinement regimes in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak
journal, July 2018
- Brunner, D.; LaBombard, B.; Kuang, A. Q.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 58, Issue 9
Reassessment of steady-state operation in ITER with NBI and EC heating and current drive
journal, August 2020
- Polevoi, A. R.; Ivanov, A. A.; Medvedev, S. Yu.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 9
Convective transport by intermittent blob-filaments: Comparison of theory and experiment
journal, June 2011
- D’Ippolito, D. A.; Myra, J. R.; Zweben, S. J.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 18, Issue 6