Bayesian analysis of the transfer reaction
Abstract
Transfer reactions provide information about the single-particle nature of nuclear levels. In particular, the differential cross sections from these measurements are sensitive to the angular momentum of the transferred particle and the spectroscopic factor of the populated level. However, the process of extracting these properties is subject to uncertainties, both from experimental and theoretical sources. By integrating the distorted wave Born approximation into a Bayesian model, we propagate these uncertainties through to the spectroscopic factors and orbital angular momentum values. We use previously reported data of the proton pickup reaction as an example. By accounting for uncertainties in the experimental data, optical model parameters, and reaction mechanism, we find that the extracted spectroscopic factors for low-lying states of 69Cu are subject to large, asymmetric uncertainties ranging from 35 to 108%. Additionally, Bayesian model comparison is employed to assign probabilities to each of the allowed angular momentum transfers. This method confirms the assignments for many states, but suggests that the data for a state lying at 3.70 MeV are better characterized by an ℓ =3 transfer, rather than the previously reported ℓ =2 .
- Authors:
-
- North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States); Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC (United States)
- Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Arpajon (France). Direction des applications militaires (DAM), DAM-Île de France (DIF)
- Universite Paris-Saclay, Orsay (France); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Orsay (France). IN2P3, IJCLab
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1774777
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0017799
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Physical Review C
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 102; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2469-9985
- Publisher:
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS
Citation Formats
Marshall, C., Morfouace, P., de Séréville, N., and Longland, R. Bayesian analysis of the Zn 70 ( d , He 3 ) Cu 69 transfer reaction. United States: N. p., 2020.
Web. doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024609.
Marshall, C., Morfouace, P., de Séréville, N., & Longland, R. Bayesian analysis of the Zn 70 ( d , He 3 ) Cu 69 transfer reaction. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.102.024609
Marshall, C., Morfouace, P., de Séréville, N., and Longland, R. Mon .
"Bayesian analysis of the Zn 70 ( d , He 3 ) Cu 69 transfer reaction". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.102.024609. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1774777.
@article{osti_1774777,
title = {Bayesian analysis of the Zn 70 ( d , He 3 ) Cu 69 transfer reaction},
author = {Marshall, C. and Morfouace, P. and de Séréville, N. and Longland, R.},
abstractNote = {Transfer reactions provide information about the single-particle nature of nuclear levels. In particular, the differential cross sections from these measurements are sensitive to the angular momentum of the transferred particle and the spectroscopic factor of the populated level. However, the process of extracting these properties is subject to uncertainties, both from experimental and theoretical sources. By integrating the distorted wave Born approximation into a Bayesian model, we propagate these uncertainties through to the spectroscopic factors and orbital angular momentum values. We use previously reported data of the proton pickup reaction Zn 70 ( d , He 3 ) Cu 69 as an example. By accounting for uncertainties in the experimental data, optical model parameters, and reaction mechanism, we find that the extracted spectroscopic factors for low-lying states of 69Cu are subject to large, asymmetric uncertainties ranging from 35 to 108%. Additionally, Bayesian model comparison is employed to assign probabilities to each of the allowed angular momentum transfers. This method confirms the assignments for many states, but suggests that the data for a state lying at 3.70 MeV are better characterized by an ℓ =3 transfer, rather than the previously reported ℓ =2 .},
doi = {10.1103/physrevc.102.024609},
journal = {Physical Review C},
number = 2,
volume = 102,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Aug 10 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Mon Aug 10 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}
Works referenced in this record:
Ensemble samplers with affine invariance
journal, January 2010
- Goodman, Jonathan; Weare, Jonathan
- Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Vol. 5, Issue 1
Direct Comparison between Bayesian and Frequentist Uncertainty Quantification for Nuclear Reactions
journal, June 2019
- King, G. B.; Lovell, A. E.; Neufcourt, L.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 122, Issue 23
Monopole migration in observed from decay of laser-ionized
journal, October 2001
- Franchoo, S.; Huyse, M.; Kruglov, K.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 64, Issue 5
Optical model analysis of 3He elastic scattering from s-d shell nuclei at 25 MeV
journal, December 1982
- Vernotte, J.; Berrier-Ronsin, G.; Kalifa, J.
- Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 390, Issue 2
Nucleon transfer reactions with radioactive beams
journal, February 2018
- Wimmer, K.
- Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 45, Issue 3
Ambiguities in the optical potential for strongly absorbed projectiles
journal, August 1963
- Drisko, R. M.; Satchler, G. R.; Bassel, R. H.
- Physics Letters, Vol. 5, Issue 5
Nucleon-Nucleus Optical-Model Parameters, , MeV
journal, June 1969
- Becchetti, F. D.; Greenlees, G. W.
- Physical Review, Vol. 182, Issue 4
Interplay between Single-Particle and Collective Effects in the Odd- Cu Isotopes beyond
journal, March 2008
- Stefanescu, I.; Georgiev, G.; Balabanski, D. L.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, Issue 11
Mass and low-lying energy levels of
journal, November 1978
- Zeidman, B.; Nolen, J. A.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 18, Issue 5
Unified theory of nuclear reactions
journal, December 1958
- Feshbach, Herman
- Annals of Physics, Vol. 5, Issue 4
Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters
journal, February 2017
- Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.; Sarich, J.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 95, Issue 2
Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( ) reactions
journal, October 2018
- King, G. B.; Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 98, Issue 4
Compilation of phenomenological optical-model parameters 1954–1975
journal, January 1976
- Perey, C. M.; Perey, F. G.
- Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 17, Issue 1
Stripping Reactions and the Structure of Light and Intermediate Nuclei
journal, July 1960
- Macfarlane, M. H.; French, J. B.
- Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 32, Issue 3
Test of Sum Rules in Nucleon Transfer Reactions
journal, January 2012
- Schiffer, J. P.; Hoffman, C. R.; Kay, B. P.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, Issue 2
Core-Excited States in the Doubly Magic and its Neighbor
journal, January 2000
- Ishii, T.; Asai, M.; Makishima, A.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 84, Issue 1
Spectroscopic factors for single-nucleon transfer in the A = 21–44 region
journal, January 1977
- Endt, P. M.
- Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 19, Issue 1
Optical-Model Analyses of Scattering of 4.1-, 7-, and 14-Mev Neutrons by Complex Nuclei
journal, February 1958
- Bjorklund, F.; Fernbach, S.
- Physical Review, Vol. 109, Issue 4
Constraining transfer cross sections using Bayes' theorem
journal, June 2018
- Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 97, Issue 6
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of spectroscopic overlaps in nuclei
journal, August 2011
- Brida, I.; Pieper, Steven C.; Wiringa, R. B.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 84, Issue 2
Global optical model potential for projectiles
journal, February 2009
- Pang, D. Y.; Roussel-Chomaz, P.; Savajols, H.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 79, Issue 2
Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation
journal, December 2006
- Skilling, John
- Bayesian Analysis, Vol. 1, Issue 4
The t-dn vertex function and the (t, d) reaction
journal, July 1973
- Goldfarb, L. J. B.; Gonzalez, J. A.; Phillips, A. C.
- Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 209, Issue 1
emcee : The MCMC Hammer
journal, March 2013
- Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925
corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python
journal, June 2016
- Foreman-Mackey, Daniel
- The Journal of Open Source Software, Vol. 1, Issue 2
States of
journal, October 1981
- Ajzenberg-Selove, F.; Brown, Ronald E.; Flynn, E. R.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 24, Issue 4
Global optical model potential for elastic deuteron scattering from 12 to 90 MeV
journal, June 1980
- Daehnick, W. W.; Childs, J. D.; Vrcelj, Z.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 21, Issue 6
Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation and Applications of Low-Energy Reactions
book, January 2009
- Thompson, Ian J.; Nunes, Filomena M.
Beta Decay of and Level Structure of Neutron-Rich Cu Isotopes
journal, October 1998
- Franchoo, S.; Huyse, M.; Kruglov, K.
- Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, Issue 15
Optical-Model Analysis of Proton Elastic Scattering in the Range of 9 to 22 MeV
journal, July 1963
- Perey, F. G.
- Physical Review, Vol. 131, Issue 2
Review Papers: Recent Developments in Nonparametric Density Estimation
journal, March 1991
- Izenman, Alan Julian
- Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 86, Issue 413
Systematic uncertainties in direct reaction theories
journal, February 2015
- Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.
- Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 42, Issue 3
Transfer reactions in nuclear astrophysics
journal, February 2016
- Bardayan, D. W.
- Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 43, Issue 4
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Bayesian Data Analysis in Astronomy
journal, August 2017
- Sharma, Sanjib
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 55, Issue 1
Normalization of and Finite-Range Effects in ( , ) and ( ) Reactions
journal, September 1966
- Bassel, R. H.
- Physical Review, Vol. 149, Issue 3
as a probe of direct capture in the reaction
journal, November 2002
- Bertone, P. F.; Champagne, A. E.; Boswell, M.
- Physical Review C, Vol. 66, Issue 5
dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences
journal, February 2020
- Speagle, Joshua S.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 3
A global nucleon optical model potential
journal, March 1991
- Varner, R. L.; Thompson, W. J.; McAbee, T. L.
- Physics Reports, Vol. 201, Issue 2
, a Test of the Validity of the Distorted-Wave Born Approximation
journal, November 1964
- Lee, L. L.; Schiffer, J. P.; Zeidman, B.
- Physical Review, Vol. 136, Issue 4B
Deuteron Optical-Model Analysis in the Range of 11 to 27 MeV
journal, October 1963
- Perey, C. M.; Perey, F. G.
- Physical Review, Vol. 132, Issue 2