DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Response surface data for sensitivity study of industrial spray injected fluidized bed reactor

Abstract

An industrial fluidized bed reactor was designed to convert an aqueous solid laden stream into a consistent granular product. CFD simulations were run using the MFiX two-fluid model for this fluidizing bed operating at 650 °C. A set of simulations were run over a Latin-hypercube sample of five model parameters – bed particle size, bed particle density, coal particle size, spray feed flow rate, and fluidizing gas flow rate. Data from the simulations were collected on three quantities of interest – bed differential temperature, low solids velocity, and bed voidage. The data presented here is the full span of response surfaces generated using the process Gaussian response surface model in the Dakota code, as well as the table of data for coefficients of the fitted model. The fits to the five-dimensional Gaussian Process models were 0.7797, 0.8664, and 0.9440 for the temperature, velocity, and solids packing, respectively.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
OSTI Identifier:
1671048
Report Number(s):
INL/JOU-18-45423-Rev000
Journal ID: ISSN 2352-3409; TRN: US2203886
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC07-05ID14517
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Data in Brief
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 21; Journal Issue: 0; Journal ID: ISSN 2352-3409
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; CFD; Fluidized Bed; MFIX

Citation Formats

Abboud, Alexander W., and Guillen, Donna P. Response surface data for sensitivity study of industrial spray injected fluidized bed reactor. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.105.
Abboud, Alexander W., & Guillen, Donna P. Response surface data for sensitivity study of industrial spray injected fluidized bed reactor. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.105
Abboud, Alexander W., and Guillen, Donna P. Sat . "Response surface data for sensitivity study of industrial spray injected fluidized bed reactor". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.105. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1671048.
@article{osti_1671048,
title = {Response surface data for sensitivity study of industrial spray injected fluidized bed reactor},
author = {Abboud, Alexander W. and Guillen, Donna P.},
abstractNote = {An industrial fluidized bed reactor was designed to convert an aqueous solid laden stream into a consistent granular product. CFD simulations were run using the MFiX two-fluid model for this fluidizing bed operating at 650 °C. A set of simulations were run over a Latin-hypercube sample of five model parameters – bed particle size, bed particle density, coal particle size, spray feed flow rate, and fluidizing gas flow rate. Data from the simulations were collected on three quantities of interest – bed differential temperature, low solids velocity, and bed voidage. The data presented here is the full span of response surfaces generated using the process Gaussian response surface model in the Dakota code, as well as the table of data for coefficients of the fitted model. The fits to the five-dimensional Gaussian Process models were 0.7797, 0.8664, and 0.9440 for the temperature, velocity, and solids packing, respectively.},
doi = {10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.105},
journal = {Data in Brief},
number = 0,
volume = 21,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: (a) CAD drawing of the FBR, (b) single time setup of void fraction, and (c) gas temperature profile.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames
journal, December 1981

  • Westbrook, Charles K.; Dryer, Frederick L.
  • Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 27, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1080/00102208108946970

Hierarchical calibration and validation of computational fluid dynamics models for solid sorbent-based carbon capture
journal, January 2016


The Effect of Grid Resolution and Reaction Models in Simulation of a Fluidized Bed Gasifier Through Nonintrusive Uncertainty Quantification Techniques
journal, December 2016

  • Shahnam, Mehrdad; Gel, Aytekin; Dietiker, Jean-François
  • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1115/1.4035445

Validation Study of Two Continuum Granular Frictional Flow Theories
journal, November 2008

  • Benyahia, Sofiane
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 47, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie8003557

Premixed burning in diffusion flames—the flame zone model of libby and economos
journal, May 1979


Experimental validation of CFD simulations of a lab-scale fluidized-bed reactor with and without side-gas injection
journal, October 2009

  • Min, Jian; Drake, Joshua B.; Heindel, Theodore J.
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 56, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.12077

Sensitivity study of a full-scale industrial spray-injected fluidized bed reactor
journal, July 2018


Injection of a Liquid Spray into a Fluidized Bed:  Particle−Liquid Mixing and Impact on Fluid Coker Yields
journal, September 2004

  • House, Peter K.; Saberian, Mohammad; Briens, Cedric L.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 43, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie034237q

Experimental Investigation on Interaction of Side Gas Injection with Gas Fluidized Bed Using γ-Ray Transmission Technique
journal, November 2015

  • Bhowmick, Sandip; Sharma, Vijay Kumar; Samantray, Jitendra S.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 54, Issue 46
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02741

Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.