DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Enhancing Microbial Sulfate Reduction of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Using Permeable Filled Borings

Abstract

At a service station closed in 1993, groundwater contained benzene that persisted above the cleanup goal of 1 mg/L in zones depleted of background sulfate. The benzene and other petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) were present as much as 36 feet (11 m) below the water table and therefore remediation of a thick saturated zone interval was required. Microcosms using site sediments demonstrated that anaerobic benzene biodegradation occurred only if sulfate was added, suggesting sulfate addition as a remediation approach. Twenty-four boreholes (9.1" diameter and 56' deep) were drilled around four monitoring wells, in which benzene concentrations exceeded 1 mg/L. The boreholes were backfilled with a mixture of gravel and 15,000 pounds of gypsum (which releases sulfate as it dissolves) to create “Permeable Filled Borings” (PFBs). Concurrently, nine high pressure injections (HPIs) of gypsum slurry were conducted in other site locations (312 pounds of gypsum total). PFBs were expected to release sulfate for up to 20 years, whereas HPIs were expected to produce a short-lived plume of sulfate. Concentrations of benzene and sulfate in groundwater were monitored over a 3-year period in six monitoring wells. In two wells near PFBs, benzene concentrations dropped below the cleanup goal by two to three ordersmore » of magnitude; in one well, sulfate concentrations exceeded 500 mg/L for the most recent 18 months. Benzene concentrations in two other PFB monitoring wells declined by a factor of 2 to 4, but remained above 1 mg/L, presumably due to high-dissolved PHC concentrations and possibly greater residual PHC mass in adjacent sediments, and therefore greater sulfate demand. However, hydrogen and sulfur isotopic enrichment in benzene and sulfate, respectively, confirmed biodegradation of benzene and stimulation of sulfate-reducing conditions. Thus, it is hypothesized that the PHC mass in adjacent sediments will decline over time, as will dissolved PHC concentrations, and eventually benzene concentrations will decrease below the cleanup goal. Benzene in two HPI monitoring wells was below the cleanup goal for all but one sampling event before HPIs were conducted and remained below the cleanup goal after HPIs; there was no stimulation of sulfate-reducing conditions. It is concluded that sulfate released from PFBs contributed to declining benzene concentrations.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [2];  [2]
  1. Chevron Corporation, San Ramon, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of California, Davis, CA (United States)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1544691
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-19-20227
Journal ID: ISSN 1069-3629
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 39; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 1069-3629
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Biodegradation; Sulfate; Benzene

Citation Formats

Buscheck, Timothy, Mackay, Douglas, Paradis, Charles Joseph, Schmidt, Radomir, and de Sieyes, Nicholas. Enhancing Microbial Sulfate Reduction of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Using Permeable Filled Borings. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1111/gwmr.12346.
Buscheck, Timothy, Mackay, Douglas, Paradis, Charles Joseph, Schmidt, Radomir, & de Sieyes, Nicholas. Enhancing Microbial Sulfate Reduction of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Using Permeable Filled Borings. United States. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12346
Buscheck, Timothy, Mackay, Douglas, Paradis, Charles Joseph, Schmidt, Radomir, and de Sieyes, Nicholas. Tue . "Enhancing Microbial Sulfate Reduction of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Using Permeable Filled Borings". United States. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12346. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1544691.
@article{osti_1544691,
title = {Enhancing Microbial Sulfate Reduction of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Using Permeable Filled Borings},
author = {Buscheck, Timothy and Mackay, Douglas and Paradis, Charles Joseph and Schmidt, Radomir and de Sieyes, Nicholas},
abstractNote = {At a service station closed in 1993, groundwater contained benzene that persisted above the cleanup goal of 1 mg/L in zones depleted of background sulfate. The benzene and other petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) were present as much as 36 feet (11 m) below the water table and therefore remediation of a thick saturated zone interval was required. Microcosms using site sediments demonstrated that anaerobic benzene biodegradation occurred only if sulfate was added, suggesting sulfate addition as a remediation approach. Twenty-four boreholes (9.1" diameter and 56' deep) were drilled around four monitoring wells, in which benzene concentrations exceeded 1 mg/L. The boreholes were backfilled with a mixture of gravel and 15,000 pounds of gypsum (which releases sulfate as it dissolves) to create “Permeable Filled Borings” (PFBs). Concurrently, nine high pressure injections (HPIs) of gypsum slurry were conducted in other site locations (312 pounds of gypsum total). PFBs were expected to release sulfate for up to 20 years, whereas HPIs were expected to produce a short-lived plume of sulfate. Concentrations of benzene and sulfate in groundwater were monitored over a 3-year period in six monitoring wells. In two wells near PFBs, benzene concentrations dropped below the cleanup goal by two to three orders of magnitude; in one well, sulfate concentrations exceeded 500 mg/L for the most recent 18 months. Benzene concentrations in two other PFB monitoring wells declined by a factor of 2 to 4, but remained above 1 mg/L, presumably due to high-dissolved PHC concentrations and possibly greater residual PHC mass in adjacent sediments, and therefore greater sulfate demand. However, hydrogen and sulfur isotopic enrichment in benzene and sulfate, respectively, confirmed biodegradation of benzene and stimulation of sulfate-reducing conditions. Thus, it is hypothesized that the PHC mass in adjacent sediments will decline over time, as will dissolved PHC concentrations, and eventually benzene concentrations will decrease below the cleanup goal. Benzene in two HPI monitoring wells was below the cleanup goal for all but one sampling event before HPIs were conducted and remained below the cleanup goal after HPIs; there was no stimulation of sulfate-reducing conditions. It is concluded that sulfate released from PFBs contributed to declining benzene concentrations.},
doi = {10.1111/gwmr.12346},
journal = {Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation},
number = 3,
volume = 39,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jun 11 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Tue Jun 11 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Anaerobic degradation of non-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons
journal, June 2011


Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of Benzene-Toluene-Ethylbenzene-Xylene-Ethanol Mixtures in Bioaugmented Aquifer Columns
journal, August 2004


Application of Diagnostic Tools to Evaluate Remediation Performance at Petroleum Hydrocarbon‐Impacted Sites
journal, October 2018

  • Bouchard, Daniel; Hunkeler, Daniel; Madsen, Eugene L.
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, Vol. 38, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12300

Methods to Estimate Source Zone Depletion of Fuel Releases by Groundwater Flow
journal, January 2018

  • Mackay, Douglas; Paradis, Charles; Buscheck, Timothy
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, Vol. 38, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12256

Comparing Natural Source Zone Depletion Pathways at a Fuel Release Site
journal, March 2018

  • Mackay, Douglas; Hathaway, Emily; de Sieyes, Nicholas
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, Vol. 38, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12278

Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes
journal, February 1968


Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation of BTEX-Contaminated Groundwater by Combined Injection of Nitrate and Sulfate
journal, April 2001

  • Cunningham, Jeffrey A.; Rahme, Halla; Hopkins, Gary D.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 35, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es001722t

A Method for Passive Release of Solutes from an Unpumped Well
journal, November 1995


A Pilot Test of Passive Oxygen Release for Enhancement of In Situ Bioremediation of BTEX-Contaminated Ground Water
journal, May 1997


Arrays of Unpumped Wells for Plume Migration Control by Semi-Passive In Situ Remediation
journal, August 1997


Anaerobic Bioremediation of Benzene under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions in a Petroleum-Contaminated Aquifer
journal, June 2000

  • Anderson, Robert T.; Lovley, Derek R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 34, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es991211a

Land Application of Sulfate Salts for Enhanced Natural Attenuation of Benzene in Groundwater: A Case Study
journal, March 2017

  • Kolhatkar, Ravi; Schnobrich, Matthew
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, Vol. 37, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12209

In situ assessment of microbial sulfate reduction in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer using push–pull tests and stable sulfur isotope analyses
journal, October 2001


In Situ MTBE Biodegradation Supported by Diffusive Oxygen Release
journal, January 2002

  • Wilson, Ryan D.; Mackay, Douglas M.; Scow, Kate M.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/es015562c

Monitoring Subsurface Microbial Ecology in a Sulfate-Amended, Gasoline-Contaminated Aquifer
journal, March 2006


Infiltration of Sulfate to Enhance Sulfate‐Reducing Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons
journal, October 2018

  • Wei, Yunxiao; Thomson, Neil R.; Aravena, Ramon
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, Vol. 38, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12298