DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The carbon and nitrogen cycle impacts of reverting perennial bioenergy switchgrass to an annual maize crop rotation

Abstract

Abstract In the age of biofuel innovation, bioenergy crop sustainability assessment has determined how candidate systems alter the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycle. These research efforts revealed how perennial crops, such as switchgrass, increase belowground soil organic carbon (SOC) and lose less N than annual crops, like maize. As demand for bioenergy increases, land managers will need to choose whether to invest in food or fuel cropping systems. However, little research has focused on the C and N cycle impacts of reverting purpose‐grown perennial bioenergy crops back to annual cropping systems. We investigated this knowledge gap by measuring C and N pools and fluxes over 2 years following reversion of a mature switchgrass stand to an annual maize rotation. The most striking treatment difference was in ecosystem respiration (ER), with the maize‐converted treatment showing the highest respiration flux of 2,073.63 (± 367.20) g C m −2  year −1 compared to the switchgrass 1,412.70 (± 28.72) g C m −2  year −1 and maize‐control treatments 1,699.16 (± 234.79) g C m −2  year −1 . This difference was likely driven by increased heterotrophic respiration of belowground switchgrass necromass in the maize‐converted treatment. Predictions from the DayCent model showed it would take approximately 5 years for SOC dynamics inmore » the converted treatment to return to conditions of the maize‐control treatment. N losses were highest from the maize‐converted treatment when compared to undisturbed switchgrass and maize‐control, particularly during the first conversion year. These results show substantial C and N losses occur within the first 2 years after reversion of switchgrass to maize. Given farmers are likely to rotate between perennial and annual crops in the future to meet market demands, our results indicate that improvements to the land conversion approach are needed to preserve SOC built up by perennial crops to maintain the long‐term ecological sustainability of bioenergy cropping systems.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [2];  [8];  [9];  [7];  [10]; ORCiD logo [11]; ORCiD logo [12]; ORCiD logo [13]; ORCiD logo [14]
  1. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, School of Agriculture and Environment University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia
  2. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences University of Idaho Moscow ID USA
  3. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  4. Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit USDA/ARS Urbana IL USA
  5. Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  6. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  7. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA
  8. Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  9. Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  10. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  11. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  12. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  13. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  14. Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit USDA/ARS Urbana IL USA, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA, Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI), Urbana, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1668453
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1670164; OSTI ID: 1786950
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0018420
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; Bioenergy; eddy covariance; land use change; soil biogeochemical cycles

Citation Formats

Moore, Caitlin E., Berardi, Danielle M., Blanc‐Betes, Elena, Dracup, Evan C., Egenriether, Sada, Gomez‐Casanovas, Nuria, Hartman, Melannie D., Hudiburg, Tara, Kantola, Ilsa, Masters, Michael D., Parton, William J., Van Allen, Rachel, Haden, Adam C., Yang, Wendy H., DeLucia, Evan H., and Bernacchi, Carl J. The carbon and nitrogen cycle impacts of reverting perennial bioenergy switchgrass to an annual maize crop rotation. United Kingdom: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12743.
Moore, Caitlin E., Berardi, Danielle M., Blanc‐Betes, Elena, Dracup, Evan C., Egenriether, Sada, Gomez‐Casanovas, Nuria, Hartman, Melannie D., Hudiburg, Tara, Kantola, Ilsa, Masters, Michael D., Parton, William J., Van Allen, Rachel, Haden, Adam C., Yang, Wendy H., DeLucia, Evan H., & Bernacchi, Carl J. The carbon and nitrogen cycle impacts of reverting perennial bioenergy switchgrass to an annual maize crop rotation. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12743
Moore, Caitlin E., Berardi, Danielle M., Blanc‐Betes, Elena, Dracup, Evan C., Egenriether, Sada, Gomez‐Casanovas, Nuria, Hartman, Melannie D., Hudiburg, Tara, Kantola, Ilsa, Masters, Michael D., Parton, William J., Van Allen, Rachel, Haden, Adam C., Yang, Wendy H., DeLucia, Evan H., and Bernacchi, Carl J. Tue . "The carbon and nitrogen cycle impacts of reverting perennial bioenergy switchgrass to an annual maize crop rotation". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12743.
@article{osti_1668453,
title = {The carbon and nitrogen cycle impacts of reverting perennial bioenergy switchgrass to an annual maize crop rotation},
author = {Moore, Caitlin E. and Berardi, Danielle M. and Blanc‐Betes, Elena and Dracup, Evan C. and Egenriether, Sada and Gomez‐Casanovas, Nuria and Hartman, Melannie D. and Hudiburg, Tara and Kantola, Ilsa and Masters, Michael D. and Parton, William J. and Van Allen, Rachel and Haden, Adam C. and Yang, Wendy H. and DeLucia, Evan H. and Bernacchi, Carl J.},
abstractNote = {Abstract In the age of biofuel innovation, bioenergy crop sustainability assessment has determined how candidate systems alter the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycle. These research efforts revealed how perennial crops, such as switchgrass, increase belowground soil organic carbon (SOC) and lose less N than annual crops, like maize. As demand for bioenergy increases, land managers will need to choose whether to invest in food or fuel cropping systems. However, little research has focused on the C and N cycle impacts of reverting purpose‐grown perennial bioenergy crops back to annual cropping systems. We investigated this knowledge gap by measuring C and N pools and fluxes over 2 years following reversion of a mature switchgrass stand to an annual maize rotation. The most striking treatment difference was in ecosystem respiration (ER), with the maize‐converted treatment showing the highest respiration flux of 2,073.63 (± 367.20) g C m −2  year −1 compared to the switchgrass 1,412.70 (± 28.72) g C m −2  year −1 and maize‐control treatments 1,699.16 (± 234.79) g C m −2  year −1 . This difference was likely driven by increased heterotrophic respiration of belowground switchgrass necromass in the maize‐converted treatment. Predictions from the DayCent model showed it would take approximately 5 years for SOC dynamics in the converted treatment to return to conditions of the maize‐control treatment. N losses were highest from the maize‐converted treatment when compared to undisturbed switchgrass and maize‐control, particularly during the first conversion year. These results show substantial C and N losses occur within the first 2 years after reversion of switchgrass to maize. Given farmers are likely to rotate between perennial and annual crops in the future to meet market demands, our results indicate that improvements to the land conversion approach are needed to preserve SOC built up by perennial crops to maintain the long‐term ecological sustainability of bioenergy cropping systems.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12743},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Sep 29 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Tue Sep 29 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12743

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Mean annual cumulative (a) net ecosystem exchange (NEE), (b) ecosystem respiration (ER), and (c) gross primary productivity (GPP) for maize-control (2008–2018), switchgrass (2008–2016) and maize-converted (2017–2018) at the University of Illinois Energy Farm, Illinois, United States. The shading around the mean represents the standard error of the mean,more » also indicating inter-annual variability for each flux variable« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US
journal, January 2016


Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
journal, June 2008

  • Hothorn, Torsten; Bretz, Frank; Westfall, Peter
  • Biometrical Journal, Vol. 50, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810425

Assessing the potential to decrease the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone with Midwest US perennial cellulosic feedstock production
journal, August 2016

  • VanLoocke, Andy; Twine, Tracy E.; Kucharik, Christopher J.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12385

Soil nitrous oxide flux following land-use reversion from Miscanthus and SRC willow to perennial ryegrass
journal, August 2018

  • McCalmont, Jon P.; Rowe, Rebecca; Elias, Dafydd
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12541

Can biofuels be a solution to climate change? The implications of land use change-related emissions for policy
journal, February 2011

  • Khanna, Madhu; Crago, Christine L.; Black, Mairi
  • Interface Focus, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0016

Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer
journal, January 1980

  • Webb, E. K.; Pearman, G. I.; Leuning, R.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 106, Issue 447, p. 85-100
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49710644707

Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum
journal, August 2009


Quality Control and Flux Sampling Problems for Tower and Aircraft Data
journal, June 1997


Soil nutrient removal by four potential bioenergy crops: Zea mays, Panicum virgatum, Miscanthus×giganteus, and prairie
journal, January 2016

  • Masters, Michael D.; Black, Christopher K.; Kantola, Ilsa B.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 216
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.016

Initial cultivation of a temperate-region soil immediately accelerates aggregate turnover and CO2 and N2O fluxes
journal, August 2006


Impact of historical land-use changes on greenhouse gas exchange in the U.S. Great Plains, 1883–2003
journal, June 2011

  • Hartman, Melannie D.; Merchant, Emily R.; Parton, William J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/10-0036.1

Switching to Perennial Energy Crops Under Uncertainty and Costly Reversibility
journal, April 2011

  • Song, F.; Zhao, J.; Swinton, S. M.
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aar018

Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn-Soybean Rotations
journal, March 2005

  • Al-Kaisi, Mahdi M.; Yin, Xinhua
  • Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 34, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0437

Litter quantity, litter chemistry, and soil texture control changes in soil organic carbon fractions under bioenergy cropping systems of the North Central U.S.
journal, April 2019

  • von Haden, Adam C.; Kucharik, Christopher J.; Jackson, Randall D.
  • Biogeochemistry, Vol. 143, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10533-019-00564-7

Nitrogen Mineralization, Immobilization, and Nitrification
book, September 2018


Historical soil drainage mediates the response of soil greenhouse gas emissions to intense precipitation events
journal, January 2019


Development of the DayCent-Photo model and integration of variable photosynthetic capacity
journal, October 2018

  • Straube, Jonathan R.; Chen, Maosi; Parton, William J.
  • Frontiers of Earth Science, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11707-018-0736-6

Bioenergy crop greenhouse gas mitigation potential under a range of management practices
journal, March 2014

  • Hudiburg, Tara W.; Davis, Sarah C.; Parton, William
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12152

Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
journal, June 2017

  • Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L.
  • Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324

Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
journal, February 2008


Moldboard plow tillage depth and short-term carbon dioxide release
journal, May 2007


A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: The role of landscape scale heterogeneity
journal, April 2013


The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011

  • Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.828

An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows
journal, June 2000


Reduced Nitrogen Losses after Conversion of Row Crop Agriculture to Perennial Biofuel Crops
journal, January 2013

  • Smith, Candice M.; David, Mark B.; Mitchell, Corey A.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0210

DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing
journal, December 1998


OzFlux data: network integration from collection to curation
journal, January 2017


Evaluation of methods for nitrogen‐15 analysis of inorganic nitrogen in soil extracts. II. Diffusion methods
journal, June 1995

  • Herman, D. J.; Brooks, P. D.; Ashraf, M.
  • Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 26, Issue 11-12
  • DOI: 10.1080/00103629509369400

Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels
journal, May 2015

  • Elshout, P. M. F.; van Zelm, R.; Balkovic, J.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2642

Long-Term Yields of Switchgrass, Giant Reed, and Miscanthus in the Mediterranean Basin
journal, October 2015

  • Alexopoulou, Efthymia; Zanetti, Federica; Scordia, Danilo
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9687-x

Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming
journal, March 2007


On the Temperature Dependence of Soil Respiration
journal, June 1994

  • Lloyd, J.; Taylor, J. A.
  • Functional Ecology, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/2389824

Management swing potential for bioenergy crops
journal, January 2013

  • Davis, Sarah C.; Boddey, Robert M.; Alves, Bruno J. R.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12042

Small root exclusion collars provide reasonable estimates of root respiration when measured during the growing season of installation
journal, September 2005

  • Vogel, Jason G.; Valentine, David W.
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 35, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1139/x05-117

Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?
journal, January 2017

  • Fajardy, Mathilde; Mac Dowell, Niall
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1039/C7EE00465F

Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production
journal, August 2011

  • Gelfand, I.; Zenone, T.; Jasrotia, P.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017277108

Equations for Following Nutrient Transformations in Soil, Utilizing Tracer Data1
journal, January 1954


Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use
journal, November 2017

  • Whitaker, Jeanette; Field, John L.; Bernacchi, Carl J.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12488

Nitrogen fertilization challenges the climate benefit of cellulosic biofuels
journal, June 2016


A numerical evaluation of chamber methods for determining gas fluxes
journal, September 1978

  • Matthias, Allan D.; Yarger, Douglas N.; Weinbeck, Robert S.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 5, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/GL005i009p00765

Nitrogen fertility and harvest management of switchgrass for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production in Illinois
journal, July 2013


Reflections on the surface energy imbalance problem
journal, April 2012


Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods
journal, November 2006


Ion exchange resin based soil solution lysimeters and snowmelt solution collectors
journal, May 2002

  • Susfalk, R. B.; Johnson, D. W.
  • Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 33, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120003886

Soil microclimates influence annual carbon loss via heterotrophic soil respiration in maize and switchgrass bioenergy cropping systems
journal, December 2019


Carbon debt of field-scale conservation reserve program grasslands converted to annual and perennial bioenergy crops
journal, February 2019

  • Abraha, Michael; Gelfand, Ilya; Hamilton, Stephen K.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aafc10

The US Ethanol and Biofuels Boom: Its Origins, Current Status, and Future Prospects
journal, July 2008


Carbon exchange by establishing biofuel crops in Central Illinois
journal, November 2011

  • Zeri, Marcelo; Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina; Hickman, George
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 144, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.09.006

Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River
journal, March 2008

  • Donner, S. D.; Kucharik, C. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708300105

Altered Belowground Carbon Cycling Following Land-Use Change to Perennial Bioenergy Crops
journal, January 2013

  • Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.; Masters, Michael D.; Black, Christopher K.
  • Ecosystems, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10021-012-9628-x

Measuring gross nitrogen mineralization, and nitrification by 15 N isotopic pool dilution in intact soil cores
journal, September 1991


Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time
journal, November 2014


21st‐century biogeochemical modeling: Challenges for Century‐based models and where do we go from here?
journal, August 2020

  • Berardi, Danielle; Brzostek, Edward; Blanc‐Betes, Elena
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12730

Legacy effects of land use on soil nitrous oxide emissions in annual crop and perennial grassland ecosystems
journal, June 2018

  • Abraha, Michael; Gelfand, Ilya; Hamilton, Stephen K.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 28, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.1745

Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.