DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel

Abstract

For additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic materials, the certification and qualification paradigm needs to evolve as there is currently no broadly accepted “ASTM- or DIN-type” additive manufacturing certification process or AM-produced material specifications. Accordingly, design, manufacture, and subsequent implementation and insertion of AM materials to meet engineering applications requires detailed quantification of the constitutive (strength and damage) properties of these evolving materials, across the spectrum of metallic AM methods, in comparison/contrast to conventionally-manufactured metals and alloys. For this paper, cylindrical samples of 316L SS were produced using a LENS MR-7 laser additive manufacturing system from Optomec (Albuquerque, NM) equipped with a 1 kW Yb-fiber laser. The microstructure of the AM-316L SS was characterized in both the “as-built” AM state and following a heat-treatment designed to obtain full recrystallization to facilitate comparison with annealed wrought 316L SS. The constitutive behavior as a function of strain rate and temperature was characterized and is compared to that of annealed wrought 316L SS plate material. The dynamic shock-loading-induced damage evolution and failure response of all three 316L SS materials was quantified using flyer-plate impact driven spallation experiments at peak stresses of 4.7 and 6.5 GPa. The spall strength of AM-produced 316L SS and themore » recrystallized-AM-316L SS were found to decrease with increasing peak shock stress while the annealed wrought 316L SS spall strength remained essentially constant. Finally, the damage evolution, characterized using optical metallography and electron-backscatter diffraction (EBSD), was found to vary significantly across the three 316L SS microstructures while the three samples loaded to a peak shock stress of 6.5 GPa displayed only ~12% differences in spall strength.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  2. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States). Inst. for Shock Physics
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOD
OSTI Identifier:
1463491
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1549633
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-18-21099
Journal ID: ISSN 1359-6454
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Acta Materialia
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 138; Journal ID: ISSN 1359-6454
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; 42 ENGINEERING; additive manufacturing; 316L SS; spallation; microstructure; damage evolution

Citation Formats

Gray, G. T., Livescu, V., Rigg, P. A., Trujillo, C. P., Cady, C. M., Chen, S. R., Carpenter, J. S., Lienert, T. J., and Fensin, S. J. Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.045.
Gray, G. T., Livescu, V., Rigg, P. A., Trujillo, C. P., Cady, C. M., Chen, S. R., Carpenter, J. S., Lienert, T. J., & Fensin, S. J. Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.045
Gray, G. T., Livescu, V., Rigg, P. A., Trujillo, C. P., Cady, C. M., Chen, S. R., Carpenter, J. S., Lienert, T. J., and Fensin, S. J. Wed . "Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.045. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1463491.
@article{osti_1463491,
title = {Structure/property (constitutive and spallation response) of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel},
author = {Gray, G. T. and Livescu, V. and Rigg, P. A. and Trujillo, C. P. and Cady, C. M. and Chen, S. R. and Carpenter, J. S. and Lienert, T. J. and Fensin, S. J.},
abstractNote = {For additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic materials, the certification and qualification paradigm needs to evolve as there is currently no broadly accepted “ASTM- or DIN-type” additive manufacturing certification process or AM-produced material specifications. Accordingly, design, manufacture, and subsequent implementation and insertion of AM materials to meet engineering applications requires detailed quantification of the constitutive (strength and damage) properties of these evolving materials, across the spectrum of metallic AM methods, in comparison/contrast to conventionally-manufactured metals and alloys. For this paper, cylindrical samples of 316L SS were produced using a LENS MR-7 laser additive manufacturing system from Optomec (Albuquerque, NM) equipped with a 1 kW Yb-fiber laser. The microstructure of the AM-316L SS was characterized in both the “as-built” AM state and following a heat-treatment designed to obtain full recrystallization to facilitate comparison with annealed wrought 316L SS. The constitutive behavior as a function of strain rate and temperature was characterized and is compared to that of annealed wrought 316L SS plate material. The dynamic shock-loading-induced damage evolution and failure response of all three 316L SS materials was quantified using flyer-plate impact driven spallation experiments at peak stresses of 4.7 and 6.5 GPa. The spall strength of AM-produced 316L SS and the recrystallized-AM-316L SS were found to decrease with increasing peak shock stress while the annealed wrought 316L SS spall strength remained essentially constant. Finally, the damage evolution, characterized using optical metallography and electron-backscatter diffraction (EBSD), was found to vary significantly across the three 316L SS microstructures while the three samples loaded to a peak shock stress of 6.5 GPa displayed only ~12% differences in spall strength.},
doi = {10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.045},
journal = {Acta Materialia},
number = ,
volume = 138,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 26 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Wed Jul 26 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 138 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing
journal, March 2016


Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
journal, April 2014


A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies
journal, November 2012

  • Vaezi, Mohammad; Seitz, Hermann; Yang, Shoufeng
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 67, Issue 5-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2

Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing
journal, January 2016


Analysis of rapid manufacturing—using layer manufacturing processes for production
journal, January 2003

  • Hopkinson, N.; Dicknes, P.
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 217, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1243/095440603762554596

Overview of Current Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Selected Applications
journal, September 2012


Solidification in direct metal deposition by LENS processing
journal, September 2001


Understanding thermal behavior in the LENS process
journal, June 1999


Directed light fabrication of a solid metal hemisphere using 5-axis powder deposition
journal, March 1998


Development of a Near Net Shape Processing Method for Rhenium Using Directed Light Fabrication
journal, September 1998

  • Milewski, John O.; Thoma, Dan J.; Fonseca, Joe C.
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1080/10426919808935294

Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V With Controlled Voids
journal, April 2015

  • Fadida, Refael; Rittel, Daniel; Shirizly, Amnon
  • Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 82, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1115/1.4029745

Spall fracture in additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V
journal, October 2016

  • Jones, D. R.; Fensin, S. J.; Dippo, O.
  • Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 120, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4963279

Charpy impact testing of metallic selective laser melting parts
journal, June 2010

  • Yasa, Evren; Deckers, Jan; Kruth, Jean-Pierre
  • Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1080/17452751003703894

Density and porosity control of sintered 316L stainless steel parts produced by additive manufacturing
journal, September 2012


Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting
journal, September 2014

  • Cherry, J. A.; Davies, H. M.; Mehmood, S.
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 76, Issue 5-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6297-2

An Experimental Investigation into Additive Manufacturing-Induced Residual Stresses in 316L Stainless Steel
journal, September 2014

  • Wu, Amanda S.; Brown, Donald W.; Kumar, Mukul
  • Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 45, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x

The study of the laser parameters and environment variables effect on mechanical properties of high compact parts elaborated by selective laser melting 316L powder
journal, November 2013

  • Zhang, Baicheng; Dembinski, Lucas; Coddet, Christian
  • Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 584
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.055

Damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel
journal, January 2016

  • Carlton, Holly D.; Haboub, Abdel; Gallegos, Gilbert F.
  • Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 651
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.073

Additive manufactured AlSi10Mg samples using Selective Laser Melting (SLM): Microstructure, high cycle fatigue, and fracture behavior
journal, February 2012


High-Strain-Rate Deformation: Mechanical Behavior and Deformation Substructures Induced
journal, August 2012


Application of a new automatic lattice orientation measurement technique to polycrystalline aluminum
journal, February 1993

  • Wright, Stuart I.; Adams, Brent L.; Kunze, Karsten
  • Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 160, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(93)90452-K

Influence of shock-wave profile shape (triangulai- “Taylor-wave" versus square-topped) on the spallation response of 316L stainless steel
journal, September 2003

  • Gray, G. T.; Bourne, N. K.; Henrie, B. L.
  • Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings), Vol. 110
  • DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20020787

On the influence of loading profile upon the tensile failure of stainless steel
journal, May 2007

  • Gray, G. T. (Rusty); Bourne, N. K.; Henrie, B. L.
  • Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 101, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2720099

NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
journal, June 2012

  • Schneider, Caroline A.; Rasband, Wayne S.; Eliceiri, Kevin W.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2089

Compact system for high-speed velocimetry using heterodyne techniques
journal, August 2006

  • Strand, O. T.; Goosman, D. R.; Martinez, C.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 77, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2336749

Accuracy limits and window corrections for photon Doppler velocimetry
journal, January 2007

  • Jensen, B. J.; Holtkamp, D. B.; Rigg, P. A.
  • Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 101, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2407290

Residual stresses in LENS® components using neutron diffraction and contour method
journal, June 2005

  • Rangaswamy, P.; Griffith, M. L.; Prime, M. B.
  • Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 399, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.019

Residual stresses in components formed by the laserengineered net shaping (LENS®) process
journal, August 2003

  • Rangaswamy, P.; Holden, T. M.; Rogge, R. B.
  • The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, Vol. 38, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1243/030932403770735881

On the Hall-Petch relationship and substructural evolution in type 316L stainless steel
journal, November 1995


Distortion of the Wave Profiles in an Elastoplastic Body upon Spalling
journal, January 2001

  • Kanel', G. I.
  • Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, Vol. 42, Issue 2, p. 358-362
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1018804709273

Effects of grain size and boundary structure on the dynamic tensile response of copper
journal, August 2011

  • Escobedo, J. P.; Dennis-Koller, D.; Cerreta, E. K.
  • Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 110, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.3607294

Influence of anisotropy (crystallographic and microstructural) on spallation in Zr, Ta, HY-100 steel, and 1080 eutectoid steel
journal, January 2010

  • Gray, G. T.; Bourne, N. K.; Vecchio, K. S.
  • International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 163, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10704-009-9440-6

Works referencing / citing this record:

Assumption of Constraining Force to Explain Distortion in Laser Additive Manufacturing
journal, November 2018

  • Xie, Deqiao; Zhao, Jianfeng; Liang, Huixin
  • Materials, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/ma11112327

Anomalous Annealing Response of Directed Energy Deposited Type 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel
journal, January 2018


Printability of 316 stainless steel
journal, April 2019


Microstructure, Solidification Texture, and Thermal Stability of 316 L Stainless Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
journal, August 2018

  • Krakhmalev, Pavel; Fredriksson, Gunnel; Svensson, Krister
  • Metals, Vol. 8, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/met8080643

A comparison of adiabatic shear bands in wrought and additively manufactured 316L stainless steel using nanoindentation and electron backscatter diffraction
journal, September 2019

  • Weaver, Jordan S.; Livescu, Veronica; Mara, Nathan A.
  • Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 55, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03994-8

Influence of plasma sprayed zirconia coating on surface properties of additive manufactured austenitic stainless steel 316 L
journal, November 2019

  • Bhagade, Anshumaan; Gupta, Eshank; Jebaraj, A. Vinoth
  • Materials Research Express, Vol. 6, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5568

Spall fracture in additive manufactured tantalum
journal, December 2018

  • Jones, D. R.; Fensin, S. J.; Ndefru, B. G.
  • Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 124, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5063930

Cause of Angular Distortion in Fusion Welding: Asymmetric Cross-Sectional Profile along Thickness
journal, December 2018

  • Xie, Deqiao; Zhao, Jianfeng; Liang, Huixin
  • Materials, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3390/ma12010058

Printability of 316 stainless steel
text, January 2019


Cause of Angular Distortion in Fusion Welding: Asymmetric Cross-Sectional Profile along Thickness
journal, December 2018

  • Xie, Deqiao; Zhao, Jianfeng; Liang, Huixin
  • Materials, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3390/ma12010058

Defect Prevention in Selective Laser Melting Components: Compositional and Process Effects
journal, November 2019

  • Sabzi, Hossein Eskandari; Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Pedro E. J.
  • Materials, Vol. 12, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.3390/ma12223791