DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Local Radiative Feedbacks Over the Arctic Based on Observed Short‐Term Climate Variations

Abstract

Abstract We compare various radiative feedbacks over the Arctic (60–90°N) estimated from short‐term climate variations occurring in reanalysis, satellite, and global climate model data sets using the combined Kernel‐Gregory approach. The lapse rate and surface albedo feedbacks are positive, and their magnitudes are comparable. Relative to the tropics (30°S–30°N), the lapse rate feedback is the largest contributor to Arctic amplification among all feedbacks, followed by surface albedo feedback and Planck feedback deviation from its global mean. Both shortwave and longwave water vapor feedbacks are positive, leading to a significant positive net water vapor feedback over the Arctic. The net cloud feedback has large uncertainties including its sign, which strongly depends on the data used for all‐sky and clear‐sky radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere, the time periods considered, and the methods used to estimate the cloud feedback.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Institute for Climate and Global Change Research and School of Atmospheric Sciences Nanjing University Nanjing China, Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change Nanjing China, Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA
  2. Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA
  3. Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA
  4. National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA
  5. Institute for Climate and Global Change Research and School of Atmospheric Sciences Nanjing University Nanjing China, Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change Nanjing China
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1452661
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geophysical Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geophysical Research Letters Journal Volume: 45 Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Zhang, Rudong, Wang, Hailong, Fu, Qiang, Pendergrass, Angeline G., Wang, Minghuai, Yang, Yang, Ma, Po‐Lun, and Rasch, Philip J. Local Radiative Feedbacks Over the Arctic Based on Observed Short‐Term Climate Variations. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1029/2018GL077852.
Zhang, Rudong, Wang, Hailong, Fu, Qiang, Pendergrass, Angeline G., Wang, Minghuai, Yang, Yang, Ma, Po‐Lun, & Rasch, Philip J. Local Radiative Feedbacks Over the Arctic Based on Observed Short‐Term Climate Variations. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077852
Zhang, Rudong, Wang, Hailong, Fu, Qiang, Pendergrass, Angeline G., Wang, Minghuai, Yang, Yang, Ma, Po‐Lun, and Rasch, Philip J. Tue . "Local Radiative Feedbacks Over the Arctic Based on Observed Short‐Term Climate Variations". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077852.
@article{osti_1452661,
title = {Local Radiative Feedbacks Over the Arctic Based on Observed Short‐Term Climate Variations},
author = {Zhang, Rudong and Wang, Hailong and Fu, Qiang and Pendergrass, Angeline G. and Wang, Minghuai and Yang, Yang and Ma, Po‐Lun and Rasch, Philip J.},
abstractNote = {Abstract We compare various radiative feedbacks over the Arctic (60–90°N) estimated from short‐term climate variations occurring in reanalysis, satellite, and global climate model data sets using the combined Kernel‐Gregory approach. The lapse rate and surface albedo feedbacks are positive, and their magnitudes are comparable. Relative to the tropics (30°S–30°N), the lapse rate feedback is the largest contributor to Arctic amplification among all feedbacks, followed by surface albedo feedback and Planck feedback deviation from its global mean. Both shortwave and longwave water vapor feedbacks are positive, leading to a significant positive net water vapor feedback over the Arctic. The net cloud feedback has large uncertainties including its sign, which strongly depends on the data used for all‐sky and clear‐sky radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere, the time periods considered, and the methods used to estimate the cloud feedback.},
doi = {10.1029/2018GL077852},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
number = 11,
volume = 45,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077852

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 21 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

What can we learn about climate feedbacks from short-term climate variations?
journal, January 2013


Recently amplified arctic warming has contributed to a continual global warming trend
journal, November 2017


Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5
journal, July 2013


Coupled High-Latitude Climate Feedbacks and Their Impact on Atmospheric Heat Transport
journal, January 2017


A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2004


Spatial Patterns of Modeled Climate Feedback and Contributions to Temperature Response and Polar Amplification
journal, July 2011

  • Crook, Julia A.; Forster, Piers M.; Stuber, Nicola
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI3863.1

Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled model under abruptly quadrupled CO 2 : FORCING AND FEEDBACK IN THE MPI-ESM-LR
journal, October 2013

  • Block, K.; Mauritsen, T.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20041

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

The role of circulation features on black carbon transport into the Arctic in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5): BC TRANSPORT IN OFF-LINE CAM5
journal, May 2013

  • Ma, Po-Lun; Rasch, Philip J.; Wang, Hailong
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50411

MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications
journal, July 2011


The remote impacts of climate feedbacks on regional climate predictability
journal, January 2015

  • Roe, Gerard H.; Feldl, Nicole; Armour, Kyle C.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2346

Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget
journal, February 2009

  • Loeb, Norman G.; Wielicki, Bruce A.; Doelling, David R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2637.1

Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models
journal, February 2014

  • Pithan, Felix; Mauritsen, Thorsten
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2071

Sensitivity of remote aerosol distributions to representation of cloud–aerosol interactions in a global climate model
journal, January 2013

  • Wang, H.; Easter, R. C.; Rasch, P. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-765-2013

Time-Varying Climate Sensitivity from Regional Feedbacks
journal, July 2013


Surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative feedback kernels for CESM-CAM5
journal, January 2018

  • Pendergrass, Angeline G.; Conley, Andrew; Vitt, Francis M.
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-317-2018

Four perspectives on climate feedbacks: PERSPECTIVES
journal, July 2013

  • Feldl, N.; Roe, G. H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50711

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011

  • Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.828

Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity
journal, March 2015

  • Bony, Sandrine; Stevens, Bjorn; Frierson, Dargan M. W.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2398

A Decomposition of Feedback Contributions to Polar Warming Amplification
journal, September 2013


Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions
journal, May 2018


Arctic Cloud Changes from Surface and Satellite Observations
journal, August 2010


Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, January 2016


W ATER V APOR F EEDBACK AND G LOBAL W ARMING
journal, November 2000


The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification
journal, April 2010


On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates
journal, March 2013


An Analysis of the Short-Term Cloud Feedback Using MODIS Data
journal, July 2013


Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms
book, January 1984

  • Hansen, J.; Lacis, A.; Rind, D.
  • Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Vol. 29
  • DOI: 10.1029/GM029p0130

Source attribution of black carbon and its direct radiative forcing in China
journal, January 2017

  • Yang, Yang; Wang, Hailong; Smith, Steven J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-4319-2017

Sources of Intermodel Spread in the Lapse Rate and Water Vapor Feedbacks
journal, April 2018

  • Po-Chedley, Stephen; Armour, Kyle C.; Bitz, Cecilia M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 31, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0674.1

Climate Feedbacks and Their Implications for Poleward Energy Flux Changes in a Warming Climate
journal, January 2012


Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels
journal, July 2008

  • Soden, Brian J.; Held, Isaac M.; Colman, Robert
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1

Observations of Climate Feedbacks over 2000–10 and Comparisons to Climate Models
journal, January 2013


Interannual Variations of Arctic Cloud Types in Relation to Sea Ice
journal, August 2010


Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term Radiative Feedbacks and Variability in Twentieth-Century Global Climate Model Simulations
journal, December 2013


The Role of Surface Albedo Feedback in Climate
journal, April 2004


Polar amplification in a coupled climate model with locked albedo
journal, February 2009


Amplified Arctic climate change: What does surface albedo feedback have to do with it?
journal, January 2006


An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models
journal, July 2006

  • Soden, Brian J.; Held, Isaac M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3799.1

Using the Radiative Kernel Technique to Calculate Climate Feedbacks in NCAR’s Community Atmospheric Model
journal, May 2008

  • Shell, Karen M.; Kiehl, Jeffrey T.; Shields, Christine A.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI2044.1

Improved Representation of Surface Spectral Emissivity in a Global Climate Model and Its Impact on Simulated Climate
journal, May 2018


How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes?
journal, August 2006

  • Bony, Sandrine; Colman, Robert; Kattsov, Vladimir M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3819.1

The Effects of Doubling the CO 2 Concentration on the climate of a General Circulation Model
journal, January 1975


The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics
journal, January 2015

  • Kobayashi, Shinya; Ota, Yukinari; Harada, Yayoi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 93, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001

Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product
journal, January 2018


The Impact of Cloud Feedbacks on Arctic Climate under Greenhouse Forcing*
journal, February 2004


Far-infrared surface emissivity and climate
journal, November 2014

  • Feldman, Daniel R.; Collins, William D.; Pincus, Robert
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 46
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413640111

A Determination of the Cloud Feedback from Climate Variations over the Past Decade
journal, December 2010


Observational estimation of radiative feedback to surface air temperature over Northern High Latitudes
journal, April 2017


The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake
journal, February 2014

  • Rose, Brian E. J.; Armour, Kyle C.; Battisti, David S.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013GL058955