Declassification of Today's Highly Enriched Uranium Inventory at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC 20585


Declassification of Today's Highly Enriched Uranium Inventory at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Table of Contents

Specifically
Background
Benefits
Who Are the Key Stakeholders?
Contact
Questions and Answers

The Department of Energy has declassified today's total highly enriched uranium inventory at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Highly enriched uranium is defined as uranium having an enrichment above 20 percent of the fissionable isotope uranium-235.

Specifically

  • The current inventory at Y-12 is 171.9 metric tons of enriched uranium as follows:

    3.0 metric tons of low enriched uranium (having assays above .7 percent uranium-235 and less than 20 percent uranium-235 and 168.9 metric tons of highly enriched uranium.

  • The highly enriched uranium is stored in various forms: 136.9 metric tons of metal; 4.2 metric tons of oxide; and 27.8 metric tons in other forms.

Background

  • In the past, the Y-12 facility manufactured uranium components for the nuclear weapons stockpile. It still functions to disassemble and store such components. Because publication of many specifics concerning its weapons-related activities could supply information useful to a proliferator, only a limited release of data can be made without jeopardizing proliferation constraints.
  • Y-12 also supplied highly enriched uranium metal and other materials for the Department of Energy complex and various research reactors. It produced uranium metal from different feed forms of the element such as oxides or fluorides.
  • The inventory of highly enriched uranium may not reflect all material that will be recovered during decontamination of buildings and equipment or material waste.
  • The quantity listed here is based on the evaluation of the records available. The quantity may be updated or revised in the future after re-evaluation of the methodology used originally.

Benefits

  • As part of the Secretary of Energy's Openness Initiative, the Department of Energy is declassifying information regarding the total current inventory of highly enriched uranium at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. As a result of this declassification, the American public will have information that is important to the ongoing discussions of uranium storage and safety, and environmental issues. The release of this information should encourage other nations to declassify similar information.
  • Inventory data may permit more knowledgeable public discussion of public policy on weapons uranium disposal and domestic and international safeguarding.
  • This declassification will be of assistance to regulators who must oversee environmental, health, and safety conditions at the Y-12 Plant.
  • This declassification will also permit more environmentally relevant information to be provided to stakeholders and the public.
  • Could have valuable nonproliferation benefits by making potential International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards arrangements easier to implement.

Who Are the Key Stakeholders?

  • The Public. Public discussion of issues related to uranium quantities will have a more factual basis.
  • Public Interest Organizations. Stakeholders include environmental, safety and health groups, historians, archivists, researchers, scientists and industrial workers, as well as State and Federal personnel. With this declassification, those interested in oversight of highly enriched uranium related activities will have additional information regarding today's highly enriched uranium inventory at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Public interest organizations which have expressed such an interest include (but are not limited to): Citizens for Better Health; Energy Research Foundation; Environmental Information Network; Foundation for Global Sustainability; Friends of the Earth; Greenpeace; League of Women Voters; Military Production Network; National Security Archive; Natural Resources Defense Council; Oak Ridge Education Project; Physicians for Social Responsibility; and Sierra Club.
  • Freedom of Information Act Requesters. Specific requesters will receive more of the data that they are seeking.

Contact

U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Public Affairs
Contact: Sam Grizzle
(202) 586-5806


U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC 20585


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q. How safe is the uranium storage at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee?

A. Onsite reviews indicate that the storage is safe. Enriched uranium is stored at Y-12 inside sealed metal containers within large concrete and steel vaults that are designed to withstand tornadoes and earthquakes. A highly trained and equipped security force is in place at all times. The storage is considered very safe and secure.

Q. Does the storage and use of chemicals, such as lithium, and the release of radioactive materials, such as uranium, at the Y-12 Plant represent a health hazard to the workers or the public?

A. The Department of Energy is addressing the question of health hazards from exposures to chemicals and radioactive materials by sponsoring a comprehensive package of health studies of Oak Ridge workers and community residents.

The medical surveillance program examines workers exposed to chemicals and radioactive materials to identify signs of organ damage known to be associated with metals, such as beryllium, mercury and uranium. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is managing a special study of mercury workers.

The Department of Energy has established a special medical monitoring program for beryllium workers at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. In 1991, two beryllium workers who had been diagnosed with other lung diseases were determined to have chronic beryllium disease. In 1993, 146 current beryllium workers were provided a the blood lymphocyte proliferation test for immunologic sensitivity to beryllium. Six cases of chronic beryllium disease were diagnosed among those with abnormal blood test results. In 1994, 383 former beryllium workers have been provided the blood test, 12 have been found to be abnormal, and 1 case of chronic beryllium disease has been diagnosed. One individual with an abnormal blood test was found not to have chronic beryllium disease and 10 others are scheduled for or in the process of receiving diagnostic medical examinations.

The Department of Energy conducted mortality studies of workers at various facilities on the Oak Ridge reservation. The studies included industrial exposures to nonradioactive chemicals such as elemental mercury, and to ionizing radiation primarily through exposure to uranium. A mortality study of 2,133 white male workers exposed to elemental mercury at Y-12 and an unexposed group was published in 1984. The mercury exposed workers did not have any statistically significant causes of death, whereas the control group exhibited two cancer categories with more deaths than expected. In a related study, a group of 247 workers heavily exposed to elemental mercury and a control group were studied for clinical evidence of mercury toxicity. The results of this study, published in 1988, determined that the mercury workers had few clinically significant abnormalities except for the increased prevalence of tremor. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education and the Emory University are updating this study under a contract with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

A Y-12 mortality study, published in 1981, included 18,869 white males employed for more than 2 days between June 1943 and May 1947. No personnel dosimetry data was available, although radiation exposure was primarily due to uranium dust. The vital status of the workers was followed through 1973. The elevated risk of lung cancer was statistically significant among men hired at age 45 or older and exposed to uranium dust. Employees in this cohort who were exposed to phosgene were also the subjects of two separate mortality studies published in 1980 and 1985. Exposure to phosgene is associated with increased deaths due to lung diseases, including lung cancer, but there was no observed excess of lung cancer and only a slight increase in respiratory disease mortality through 1985. A special study of 27 cases of central nervous system cancers among Y-12 workers was published in 1987. No association between the risk of these tumors and internal exposure (using the lung dose from uranium as the surrogate for brain dose) or external radiation was found.

A mortality study of 6,781 white males employed at Y-12 for at least 30 days between 1947 and 1974 was published in 1988. This study examined the mortality of workers exposed to ionizing radiation from uranium compounds. The death rate for lung cancer was statistically significantly elevated when compared with U.S. death rates. There was evidence that the risk of lung cancer increased with increasing exposure to ionizing radiation. There was no excess rate of death among workers when compared with Tennessee death rates. This study has been updated through 1990 and the report is expected in 1994 after review by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health who currently manage DOE analytic epidemiology studies.

Y-12 workers are also part of other Oak Ridge studies in progress that focus on statistical methodology rather than risk of disease.

A mortality study of the Oak Ridge workers was published in 1985. The vital status of 8,375 white males who worked at least 1 month between 1943 and 1972 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory was followed. This study included mortality through 1977. Statistically significant decreases of cancer deaths were noted for 6 of the 23 categories of cause of death and none had statistically significant increases. Deaths due to leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, and prostate cancer were slightly elevated. Leukemia death rates were highest among men employed 10 or more years or involved in engineering activities.

A second study of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory cohort was published in 1991. The study found a statistically significant excess death rate from all leukemia combined although there was no correlation with the amount of ionizing radiation encountered in the workplace. The overall cancer death rate increased with increasing exposure to ionizing radiation. The statistical tables in the 1991 publication were in error, but the conclusions remained unchanged. In 1992 a second publication analyzed associations between cancer mortality and occupation. The author concluded that isotope production, chemical operations and exposures to mercury, beryllium and lead may be associated with higher cancer risks. The vital status of the workers included in the Oak Ridge study is expected to be updated through 1990.

The results of these studies were published and the information was provided to workers.

A community dose reconstruction study to estimate chemical and radiation doses to community residents is being initiated this year by the State of Tennessee under a State Health Agreement. It will assess releases of materials to the environment and the pathways leading to human exposure.

The State Health Agreement also supports quality assurance activities to enhance the operations of the Tennessee cancer registration program. The registration of cancer cases in a surveillance system will help detect unusual patterns or clusters of cancer in workers or residents living near the site. The clusters can then be examined for potential associations with site operations or releases.

The State Health Agreement supports a birth defects registry in Tennessee. The registry provides information about any reproductive outcomes so that those can be analyzed to determine if they are associated with the Department of Energy operations in Tennessee.

The following information is a summary of bioassay (medical surveillance) programs at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory facilities:

Workers at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

During calendar year 1993, 1,978 workers at Y-12 were monitored for potential exposure to uranium. The number of positive doses in that group was 687. Five hundred and seventy-two of these represented doses between 1-10 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. Committed effective dose equivalent is the dose that the individual will receive from the uptake that is delivered to body tissue over the next 50 years. Ninety-three doses fell within the range of 10-30 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. Eighteen doses fell within the range of 31-100 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. One dose fell within the range of 101-150 mrem committed effective dose equivalent and the highest was in the range of 201-250 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. There was no reported exposure to either plutonium or tritium (H-3). The majority of the doses at Y-12 are chronic exposures. Thus there is little distinction between historical and current exposures.

Workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10)

During calendar year 1993, 1,245 personnel were monitored at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) for potential internal dose. Of these about 95 percent were monitored for plutonium, H-3 or uranium. There were no positive plutonium doses. Two positive H-3 doses ranged from 1-2 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. Seven positive uranium doses ranged from 2-66 mrem committed effective dose equivalent.

Historical burdens are being followed for three individuals for plutonium, two for uranium and none for H-3.

Workers at the Oak Ridge K-25 Plant

During calendar year 1993, 1,339 individuals were monitored (all for uranium). The number of individuals with positive uranium doses was 64. The range of the uranium uptakes was 1-16 mrem committed effective dose equivalent. This range could change as 14 of these dose assignments are under current analyses update.

Q. Why is there so much uranium at Oak Ridge?

A. The Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge has processed and produced most of the uranium weapons components provided to the U.S. weapons stockpile and, therefore, has maintained a significant material inventory. Many uranium weapon components were returned to Oak Ridge for storage as weapons have been retired.

Q. Why are you shipping uranium parts from Pantex to Y-12? Why not just leave the uranium parts at Pantex?

A. New facilities would have to be built at Pantex to store such components at that site which would be costly and time consuming.

Q. Why don't we blend down all the U.S. highly enriched uranium for commercial reactor fuel?

A. Some highly enriched uranium is required for national defense, including fuel for the Navy's nuclear-powered vessels. Surplus stocks could be available for processing and blending down to civil reactor fuel over time.

Q. How long will the uranium be stored at Oak Ridge?

A. Decisions on extended storage await the Environmental Impact Statement on Reconfiguration and the Environmental Impact Statement on Material Disposition.


Click to return to the table of contents for this fact sheet.
Click here to return to the list of fact sheets.
Click here to go to the previous fact sheet.
Click here to go to the next fact sheet.