Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- NON LANL
In recent years, a strong debate has emerged in the hydrologic literature regarding what constitutes an appropriate framework for uncertainty estimation. Particularly, there is strong disagreement whether an uncertainty framework should have its roots within a proper statistical (Bayesian) context, or whether such a framework should be based on a different philosophy and implement informal measures and weaker inference to summarize parameter and predictive distributions. In this paper, we compare a formal Bayesian approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) for assessing uncertainty in conceptual watershed modeling. Our formal Bayesian approach is implemented using the recently developed differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) MCMC scheme with a likelihood function that explicitly considers model structural, input and parameter uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that DREAM and GLUE can generate very similar estimates of total streamflow uncertainty. This suggests that formal and informal Bayesian approaches have more common ground than the hydrologic literature and ongoing debate might suggest. The main advantage of formal approaches is, however, that they attempt to disentangle the effect of forcing, parameter and model structural error on total predictive uncertainty. This is key to improving hydrologic theory and to better understand and predict the flow of water through catchments.
- Research Organization:
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- DOE
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC52-06NA25396
- OSTI ID:
- 960772
- Report Number(s):
- LA-UR-08-07136; LA-UR-08-7136
- Journal Information:
- Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Journal Name: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Journal Issue: 7 Vol. 23; ISSN 1436-3240
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson
|
journal | October 2008 |
Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?
|
journal | October 2008 |
Similar Records
Bayesian calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models: A study of advanced Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Determining Physical Parameters of Shielded Uranium using Gamma Spectroscopy and the Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) Method