Controlling principles for prior probability assignments in nuclear risk assessment
Journal Article
·
· Nucl. Sci. Eng.; (United States)
OSTI ID:6957685
As performed conventionally, nuclear probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) may be criticized as utilizing inscrutable and unjustifiably ''precise'' quantitative informed judgment or extrapolation from that judgment. To meet this criticism, controlling principles that govern the formulation of probability densities are proposed, given only the informed input that would be required for a simple bounding analysis. These principles are founded upon information theoretic ideas of maximum uncertainty and cover both cases in which there exists a stochastic model of the phenomenon of interest and cases in which these is no such model. In part, the principles are conventional, and such an approach is justified by appealing to certain analogies in accounting practice and judicial decision making. Examples are given. Appropriate employment of these principles is expected to facilitate substantial progress toward PRA scrutability and transparency.
- Research Organization:
- United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) Culham Lab., Abingdon
- OSTI ID:
- 6957685
- Journal Information:
- Nucl. Sci. Eng.; (United States), Journal Name: Nucl. Sci. Eng.; (United States) Vol. 94:2; ISSN NSENA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Controlling principles for prior probability assignments in nuclear risk assessment
Is probability of frequency too narrow?
A computational risk assessment approach to the integration of seismic and flooding hazards with internal hazards
Technical Report
·
Fri Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 1986
·
OSTI ID:6122319
Is probability of frequency too narrow?
Conference
·
Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1993
·
OSTI ID:10102501
A computational risk assessment approach to the integration of seismic and flooding hazards with internal hazards
Journal Article
·
Thu Sep 26 20:00:00 EDT 2019
· Nuclear Engineering and Design
·
OSTI ID:1638262