Lifeline electricity rates as an income-transfer device
Journal Article
·
· Land Econ.; (United States)
The lifeline electricity rates are presumed to be inefficient because they violate optimal pricing principles, but they may also be an ineffective and inequitable way to transfer assistance to low-income households. Evidence is presented to challenge the assumption that simple demand changes will permit high-consuming households to subsidize low-income users. Social security, food stamps, and other social programs are better alternatives to a general income transfer. 7 references, 2 tables. (DCK)
- Research Organization:
- Portland State Univ., OR
- OSTI ID:
- 6404089
- Journal Information:
- Land Econ.; (United States), Journal Name: Land Econ.; (United States) Vol. 57:1; ISSN LAECA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Lifeline and incremental cost residential electric rates
Gainers and losers with lifeline electricity rates
Lifeline electricity rates as an income-transfer device: comment
Journal Article
·
Wed Feb 16 23:00:00 EST 1977
· Public Util. Fortn.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:7121283
Gainers and losers with lifeline electricity rates
Journal Article
·
Sun Nov 21 23:00:00 EST 1982
· Public Util. Fortn.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6543401
Lifeline electricity rates as an income-transfer device: comment
Journal Article
·
Sat May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1982
· Land Econ.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:5232498
Related Subjects
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290200 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Economics & Sociology
296000* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Electric Power
BEHAVIOR
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ECONOMICS
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
HUMAN POPULATIONS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
LOW INCOME GROUPS
MINORITY GROUPS
POPULATIONS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
RATE STRUCTURE
290200 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Economics & Sociology
296000* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Electric Power
BEHAVIOR
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ECONOMICS
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
HUMAN POPULATIONS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
LOW INCOME GROUPS
MINORITY GROUPS
POPULATIONS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
RATE STRUCTURE