How well are PURPA's cogeneration incentives functioning
Journal Article
·
· Energy Econ., Policy Manage.; (United States)
OSTI ID:6076550
Numerous articles have been written on the regulatory and financial incentives offered private cogenerators in the Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act. Few, however, have attempted to chronicle in any detail how states have implemented the major provisions of PURPA or how industry has responded to these legislative incentives. Furthermore, since a feature report on cogeneration appeared in this periodical (Summer 1982), both of the major court cases that then cast a shadow over the future of cogeneration enterprises have been resolved. Thus, it seems appropriate to take a new look at the situation of cogeneration today. Perhaps the most positive developments for would-be cogenerators have been the two rulings by the Supreme Court upholding the federal legislative initiative. In June, 1982, the high court upheld the constitutionality of PURPA against the challenge of the state of Mississippi. Then in May, 1983, the same court reversed an appeal's court decision that would have vacated the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC's) full-avoided cost rule and its blanket interconnection order. As the result of these two decisions, it is now difficult to see how a further challenge to the implementation of the federal cogeneration incentives could be sustained.
- Research Organization:
- Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO
- OSTI ID:
- 6076550
- Journal Information:
- Energy Econ., Policy Manage.; (United States), Journal Name: Energy Econ., Policy Manage.; (United States) Vol. 3:3; ISSN EEPMD
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Contract negotiations under PURPA and the impact of recent developments on transactions between electric utilities and cogeneration and small power-production facilities
How well are PURPA's cogeneration incentives functioning
US Supreme Court upholds FERC rules on avoided costs, power interconnections with cogenerators
Journal Article
·
Thu Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1981
· Energy Law J.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6774044
How well are PURPA's cogeneration incentives functioning
Journal Article
·
Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1983
· Energy Econ., Policy Manage.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6944647
US Supreme Court upholds FERC rules on avoided costs, power interconnections with cogenerators
Journal Article
·
Fri Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1983
· Electr. Light Power; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:5671729
Related Subjects
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290800* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Heat Utilization-- (1980-)
291000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Conservation
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
320603 -- Energy Conservation
Consumption
& Utilization-- Municipalities & Community Systems-- Public Utilities-- (1980-)
COGENERATION
DEUS
EFFICIENCY
ENERGY CONSERVATION
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
LAWS
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL INCENTIVES
NATIONAL ENERGY ACT
NORTH AMERICA
POWER GENERATION
PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY POLICIES ACT
STEAM GENERATION
USA
290800* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Heat Utilization-- (1980-)
291000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Conservation
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
320603 -- Energy Conservation
Consumption
& Utilization-- Municipalities & Community Systems-- Public Utilities-- (1980-)
COGENERATION
DEUS
EFFICIENCY
ENERGY CONSERVATION
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
LAWS
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL INCENTIVES
NATIONAL ENERGY ACT
NORTH AMERICA
POWER GENERATION
PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY POLICIES ACT
STEAM GENERATION
USA