Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Developing a Process for Collaboration-Based Siting of a Federal Consolidated Interim Storage Facility in the United States: Learning from Communities Living with Legacy Waste

Journal Article · · Nuclear Technology
In June of 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) announced the selection of its Collaboration-Based Siting (CBS) Consortia, a group of 12 awardees, including the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) (led by Vanderbilt University) to assist DOE-NE with the development of its process for siting a federal consolidated interim storage facility (FCISF) for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) storage. At this time, DOE NE is not soliciting interested host communities, rather the CBS Consortia are tasked with in-depth engagement, mutual learning, and capacity building to provide DOE NE with feedback on the CBS process. CRESP’s objective is to engage communities in two regions (the Pacific Northwest and the Southeast) with sites currently storing defense- and research-related SNF to foster learning concerning the best and worst practices in community participation in risk-informed decision making. This includes learning from existing structures for public input in radioactive waste management decision making [e.g. citizen advisory boards (CABs)] and other local parties about how to build and sustain trust among the parties. CRESP has been working to engage stakeholders and Tribes surrounding two DOE sites historically differing in receptiveness to engaging with DOE and trusting in DOE to accomplish its missions. CRESP’s approach to date has consisted of (1) engaging voluntarily members and former members of the DOE Office of Environmental Management’s CABs to develop a mutual understanding of their perspectives, values, and experiences related to risk and participatory decision making; (2) engaging members of those communities that would likely be part of any radioactive waste management discussions and who may provide valuable feedback for the development of the CBS process; and in the longer term, (3) engaging communities to foster knowledge sharing on understanding and definitions of risk and how risk is factored into community decision making. Our emphasis is to identify opportunities for improving risk communication frameworks, strategies, and decision making. The selection of a future FCISF site is likely to result in the creation of a structure similar to a CAB composed of members of the local community. We anticipate that these insights can help DOE NE learn from existing participatory risk communication structures in place at sites storing defenseor research-related SNF to understand best practices for fostering enduring and participatory relationships with future CABs. Within this paper, we (1) describe CRESP’s overall approach to assisting DOE NE with maturing the CBS process; (2) present a summary of preliminary phase 1 project results, including the development of a body of knowledge (describing available resources to support community engagement, risk communica tion, and participatory decision making) and community ecosystem information (leveraging demographic, social, economic, and environmental attribute mapping and advanced sentiment analysis of social media data); and (3) based on these results, provide observations for future research opportunities to support the development of CBS processes for radioactive waste management facilities, generally.
Research Organization:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (United States); Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
Grant/Contract Number:
FC01-06EW07053; NE0009342
OSTI ID:
3014151
Journal Information:
Nuclear Technology, Journal Name: Nuclear Technology; ISSN 0029-5450; ISSN 1943-7471
Publisher:
Informa UK LimitedCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (12)

Public preferences for environmental management practices at DOE's nuclear waste sites journal March 2011
Principal component analysis: Principal component analysis journal June 2010
Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance book December 2018
Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets journal June 2019
The spatial politics of siting a radioactive waste facility in Korea: A mixed methods approach journal February 2014
Topic Modelling and Opinion Analysis On Climate Change Twitter Data Using LDA And BERT Model. journal January 2023
Spatiotemporal Analyses of News Media Coverage on “Nuclear Waste”: A Natural Language Processing Approach journal August 2023
Four questions for risk communication journal May 2014
The end of risk communication as we know it journal June 2014
Nuclear Citizens Jury: From Local Deliberations to Transboundary and Transgenerational Legal Dilemmas journal June 2018
The social amplification of risk framework: New perspectives journal July 2022
Improving Risk Communication book December 1988

Similar Records

Can Collaboration Succeed in Siting a Spent Nuclear Fuel Facility in the United States?—A Challenge in Political Sustainability
Journal Article · Mon May 26 20:00:00 EDT 2025 · Sustainability (Basel) · OSTI ID:2573767

CRESP at one year
Conference · Mon Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1996 · OSTI ID:469723

Case studies of stakeholder decision making on radioactive waste management in the US and UK
Conference · Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · OSTI ID:21290836