Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Can Collaboration Succeed in Siting a Spent Nuclear Fuel Facility in the United States?—A Challenge in Political Sustainability

Journal Article · · Sustainability (Basel)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114906· OSTI ID:2573767
We examine the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s collaborative process to locate, build, and operate one or more federal consolidated interim storage facilities (FCISFs) for commercial U.S. spent nuclear fuel—instead of continuing to store the material at over 70 nuclear reactor sites. Technocratic siting of nuclear facilities in the U.S., most of which did not involve meaningful public participation, was not successful. We consider increasing pressure to find at least one FCISF site, as well as the critical role of trust in engaging communities and reaching agreement—leading some observers to assert that DOE is in the “trust building business”, not the siting business. We present case studies with the following: (1) illustrating community engagement that led to a more satisfactory outcome than had been anticipated (Fernald); (2) a planned voluntary process that failed to produce an operating CISF (Office of the Nuclear Waste Negotiator); and (3) a site that demonstrates the ongoing need for negotiations to keep a site open and operational (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant). The essay concludes with the observation that a collaboration-based siting effort can succeed in the U.S., but that five main challenges—related to trust and requiring patience—will need to be addressed.
Research Organization:
Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
Grant/Contract Number:
FC01-06EW07053; NE0009342
OSTI ID:
2573767
Journal Information:
Sustainability (Basel), Journal Name: Sustainability (Basel) Journal Issue: 11 Vol. 17; ISSN 2071-1050
Publisher:
MDPICopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (53)

Environmental mediation: An alternative approach to policy stalemates journal August 1983
The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting For Nuclear Waste journal February 2012
Environmental negotiation: Its potential and its economic efficiency journal June 1988
Success in negotiating environmental regulations journal March 1985
Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry journal February 2001
Trust in the U.S. Department of Energy: A post-Fukushima rebound journal June 2014
The process to find a process for governance: Nuclear waste management and consent-based siting in the United States journal May 2022
Role of the host communities in final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in Finland and Sweden journal March 2021
Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia journal January 2017
Technocracy and Trusts: Nuclear Waste Controversy journal January 1988
Why Not in My Backyard? A Radical Interpretation of Public Opposition to the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste in the United Kingdom journal September 1990
Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance journal August 2008
The final countdown to site selection for Canada’s nuclear waste geologic repository journal January 2023
The Economic Base of the Metropolis:Critical remarks on the “basic - nonbasic” concept journal December 1955
Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable? journal July 2012
From NIMBY to NIABY: regional mobilization against liquefied natural gas in the United States journal November 2011
The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social–technical divide journal November 2014
Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure journal November 2020
Introduction to the special issue “Trust, mistrust, distrust, and trust-building in the nuclear sector: historical and comparative experience from Europe” journal May 2022
COVID in NYC: What New York Did, and Should Have Done journal July 2020
Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust journal May 2021
Sacred Land or National Sacrifice Zone: The Role of Values in the Yucca Mountain Participation Process journal June 2012
The Origin and Growth of Urbanization in the World journal March 1955
The role of competence‐based trust and organizational identification in continuous improvement journal September 2004
Duties to Future Generations, Proxy Consent, Intra- and Intergenerational Equity: The Case of Nuclear Waste journal December 2000
Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks journal July 2003
Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation journal September 2003
Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs journal December 2004
Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? journal February 2005
How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities journal December 1983
Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo journal June 1993
Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks journal December 1994
Trust Relations in High‐Reliability Organizations journal October 2006
The Role of Distrust in Offshore Safety Performance journal October 2006
Trust in Risk Management: A Model‐Based Review of Empirical Research journal April 2010
Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility: Reversing Nuclear Opposition journal December 2010
American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous?: American Risk Perceptions journal November 2005
NEGOTIATION TECHNIQUES TO RESOLVE WESTERN WATER DISPUTES1 journal December 1990
Risk Communication During Crises and Chronic Exposures journal November 2022
Robert Budnitz—Tinkerer, experimenter, and nuclear safety promoter journal November 2023
Public–Private Partnering in Nuclear Reactor Development—Historical Review and Implications for Today journal March 2024
In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences journal April 2016
Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning journal February 1991
Nuclear waste transportation: case studies of identifying stakeholder risk information needs. journal March 2003
Using Concepts from the Study of Social Movements to Understand Community Response to Liquefied Natural Gas Development in Clatsop County, Oregon journal December 2019
The Basic-Nonbasic Concept of Urban Economic Functions journal July 1954
Notes on the Basic-Nonbasic Employment Ratio journal January 1955
Industrialization, Initial Advantage, and American Metropolitan Growth journal April 1965
The Utility of the Economic Base Method in Calculating Urban Growth journal February 1961
The Urban Economic Base Reconsidered journal February 1956
Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19: Can We Apply a Model Developed for Responding to Food Scares? journal July 2020
Local planning v. national policy: urban growth near nuclear power stations in the United States journal July 1986
The Impact of Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance on Public Trust in the Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban Yemen journal January 2017