Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: Physicochemical Characterization

Journal Article · · Nanomaterials
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8010025· OSTI ID:1628503
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8]
  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Office of Generic Drugs. Office of Research and Standards; DOE/OSTI
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Office of Translational Sciences. Office of Clinical Pharmacology. Division of Applied Regulatory Science
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Office of Science and Engineering Labs.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). National Center for Toxicological Research
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Office of Pharmaceutical Quality. Office of Testing and Research. Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Office of Pharmaceutical Quality. Office of Testing and Research. Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis
  7. Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States). Bindley Bioscience Center
  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Office of Generic Drugs. Office of Research and Standards

The objective of this study was to evaluate physicochemical equivalence between brand (i.e., Ferrlecit) and generic sodium ferric gluconate (SFG) in sucrose injection by conducting a series of comparative in vitro characterizations using advanced analytical techniques. The elemental iron and carbon content, thermal properties, viscosity, particle size, zeta potential, sedimentation coefficient, and molecular weight were determined. There was no noticeable difference between brand and generic SFG in sucrose injection for the above physical parameters evaluated, except for the sedimentation coefficient determined by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC) and molecular weight by asymmetric field flow fractionation-multi-angle light scattering (AFFF-MALS). In addition, brand and generic SFG complex products showed comparable molecular weight distributions when determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The observed minor differences between brand and generic SFG, such as sedimentation coefficient, do not impact their biological activities in separate studies of in vitro cellular uptake and rat biodistribution. Coupled with the ongoing clinical study comparing the labile iron level in healthy volunteers, the FDA-funded post-market studies intended to illustrate comprehensive surveillance efforts ensuring safety and efficacy profiles of generic SFG complex in sucrose injection, and also to shed new light on the approval standards on generic parenteral iron colloidal products.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0014664
OSTI ID:
1628503
Journal Information:
Nanomaterials, Journal Name: Nanomaterials Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 8; ISSN 2079-4991; ISSN NANOKO
Publisher:
MDPICopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (28)

Parenteral iron therapy options journal January 2004
Thermodynamic stability assessment of a colloidal iron drug product: Sodium ferric gluconate**This scientific contribution is intended to support regulatory policy development. The views presented in this article have not been adopted as regulatory policies by the Food and Drug Administration at this time. journal January 2010
Physicochemical and toxicological characterization of sucrose-bound polynuclear iron oxyhydroxide formulations journal July 2014
A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®), a new intravenous iron preparation and its clinical implications journal August 2011
Core size determination and structural characterization of intravenous iron complexes by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy journal May 2016
Structure of carbohydrate-bound polynuclear iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles in parenteral formulations journal November 2004
Surface characterisation of dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by laser pyrolysis and coprecipitation journal May 2005
Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation in the Field of Nanomedicine journal May 2014
Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetric Analysis To Characterize the Thermal Degradation of Crystalline Sucrose and Dried Sucrose−Salt Residues journal January 1996
Measuring Agglomerate Size Distribution and Dependence of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Absorbance on Gold Nanoparticle Agglomerate Size Using Analytical Ultracentrifugation journal September 2011
Physicochemical and toxicological characterization of a new generic iron sucrose preparation journal February 2011
Differences Between Original Intravenous Iron Sucrose and Iron Sucrose Similar Preparations journal April 2009
Do two intravenous iron sucrose preparations have the same efficacy? journal February 2011
Physicochemical properties of ferumoxytol, a new intravenous iron preparation journal June 2009
Sodium ferric gluconate (SFG) in complex with sucrose for IV infusion: bioequivalence of a new generic product with the branded product in healthy volunteers journal June 2011
Short-term stability of a new generic sodium ferric gluconate in complex with sucrose journal October 2011
Clinical case reports raise doubts about the therapeutic equivalence of an iron sucrose similar preparation compared with iron sucrose originator journal January 2012
Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients journal December 2012
Physicochemical Characterization of Iron Carbohydrate Colloid Drug Products journal July 2017
Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Iron-Deficient Subjects journal May 2004
Comparison of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Induced by Different Intravenous Iron Sucrose Similar Preparations in a Rat Model journal February 2012
Physicochemical and structural characterization of iron–sucrose formulations: a comparative study journal May 2013
Bioavailability and stability of intravenous iron sucrose originator versus generic iron sucrose AZAD journal November 2013
Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: In Vitro Cellular Uptake journal December 2017
Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: Biodistribution after Intravenous Dosing in Rats journal December 2017
Size-Distribution Analysis of Macromolecules by Sedimentation Velocity Ultracentrifugation and Lamm Equation Modeling journal March 2000
Characterization of Polymeric Nanomaterials Using Analytical Ultracentrifugation journal June 2015
Performance of Redox Active and Chelatable Iron Assays to Determine Labile Iron Release From Intravenous Iron Formulations: Labile iron assay performance journal February 2017