Beryllium Wipe Sampling (differing methods - differing exposure potentials)
This research compared three wipe sampling techniques currently used to test for beryllium contamination on room and equipment surfaces in Department of Energy facilities. Efficiencies of removal of beryllium contamination from typical painted surfaces were tested by wipe sampling without a wetting agent, with water-moistened wipe materials, and by methanol-moistened wipes. Analysis indicated that methanol-moistened wipe sampling removed about twice as much beryllium/oil-film surface contamination as water-moistened wipes, which removed about twice as much residue as dry wipes. Criteria at 10 CFR 850.30 and .31 were established on unspecified wipe sampling method(s). The results of this study reveal a need to identify criteria-setting method and equivalency factors. As facilities change wipe sampling methods among the three compared in this study, these results may be useful for approximate correlations. Accurate decontamination decision-making depends on the selection of appropriate wetting agents for the types of residues and surfaces. Evidence for beryllium sensitization via skin exposure argues in favor of wipe sampling with wetting agents that provide enhanced removal efficiency such as methanol when surface contamination includes oil mist residue.
- Research Organization:
- NNSA Kansas City Site Office (US)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE; USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) (US)
- OSTI ID:
- 837591
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: 9 Mar 2005
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Assessment of personal airborne exposures and surface contamination from x-ray vaporization of beryllium targets at the National Ignition Facility
BERYLLIUM MEASUREMENT IN COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE WET WIPES