skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Thermal and Chemical Stability of Baseline and Improved Crystalline Silicotitanate

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/814424· OSTI ID:814424

The Savannah River Site (SRS) has been evaluating technologies for removing radioactive cesium ({sup 137}Cs) from the supernate solutions stored in the high-level waste tanks at the site. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) sorbent (IONSIV IE-911{reg_sign}, UOP LLC, Des Plaines, IL), which is very effective at removing cesium from high-salt solutions, was one of three technologies that were tested. Because of the extremely high inventory of {sup 137}Cs expected for the large columns of CST that would be used for treating the SRS supernate, any loss of flow or cooling to the columns could result in high temperatures from radiolytic heating. Also, even under normal operating conditions, the CST would be exposed to the supernates for up to a year before being removed. Small-scale batch and column tests conducted last year using samples of production batches of CST showed potential problems with CST clumping and loss of cesium capacity after extended contact with the simulant solutions. Similar tests-using samples of a baseline and improved granular CST and the CST powder used to make both granular samples-were performed this year to compare the performance of the improved CST. The column tests, which used recirculating supernate simulant, showed that the baseline CST generated more precipitates of sodium aluminosilicate than the improved CST. The precipitates were particularly evident in the tubing that carried the simulant solution to and from the column, but the baseline CST also showed higher concentrations of aluminum on the CST than were observed for the improved CST. Recirculating the simulant through just a section of the tubing (no contact with CST) also produced small amounts of precipitate, similar to the amounts seen for the improved CST column. The sodium aluminosilicate formed bridges between the CST granules, causing clumps of CST to form in the column. Clumps were visible in the baseline CST column after 1 month of operation and in the improved CST column after 2 months, For the baseline CST column, the clumps were routinely dispersed by backwashing the column with simulant. After 96 days of operation, a thin hard layer of CST formed on the bottom screen of the baseline column that restricted flow through the column. The bottom cap was removed and the CST was scraped from the screen to restore the column to normal operation. After 3 months of operation, the improved CST column was completely clumped together and could not be dispersed by backwashing. The pressure drop through the column was still relatively low, so the test was continued until the pressure drop increased to >15 psig after 105 days of operation. The column was then disassembled, and the CST was physically removed from the column and broken up. These results show that both the baseline and improved CST, when contacted with the supernate simulant, have the potential for forming clumps that can restrict the flow through the small columns used in these tests. The cesium capacity of the CST samples from the column tests with recirculating simulant decreased slightly as the run time increased. Most of this decrease could be attributed to the weight of cancrinite (a sodium aluminosilicate) on the CST samples. Tests conducted last year using production batch samples of CST showed a more pronounced drop in cesium capacity under comparable conditions. A column test using the improved CST and once-through simulant showed few problems during 5 months of operation. The pressure drop through the column remained low; however, when the final samples were taken after 5 months of operations, the CST in the column had clumped together. The final sample taken from the top 1 cm of the column showed a 65% drop in cesium capacity compared with all the other samples from this column. This sample also contained the highest concentration of cancrinite, but the weight of cancrinite could account for only a small fraction of the drop in cesium capacity by simple dilution of the CST. The CST in the batch tests stored at elevated temperatures in average simulant formed clumps, but this occurred at a slower rate than that observed last year during comparable tests using production batch samples of CST. Storage at elevated temperatures caused a gradual decrease in cesium capacity as the storage time increased, with a loss in capacity of up to 20% after 5 to 6 months at 80 C. The results for the baseline and improved CST samples were essentially the same for these batch tests.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
US Department of Energy (US)
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
814424
Report Number(s):
ORNL/TM-2001/165; TRN: US200317%%227
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: 23 Jan 2002
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English