skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The nth-plant scenario for blended feedstock conversion and preprocessing nationwide: Biorefineries and depots

Journal Article · · Applied Energy

The sustainability of the biofuel industry depends on the development of a mature conversion technology on a national level that can take advantage of the economies of scale: the nth-plant. Additionally, defining the future location and supply logistics of conversion plants is imperative to ultimately transform the nation’s renewable biomass resources into cost-competitive, high-performance feedstock for production of biofuels and bioproducts. Since the US has put restrictions on production levels of conventional biofuels from edible resources, the nation needs to plan for the widespread accessibility and development of the cellulosic biofuel scenario. Conventional feedstock supply systems will be unable to handle cellulosic biomass nationwide, making it essential to expand the industry with an advanced feedstock supply system incorporating a distributed network of preprocessing depots and conversion plants, or biorefineries. Current studies are mostly limited to designing supply systems for specific regions of the country. We developed a national database with potential locations for depots and biorefineries to meet the nation’s target demand of cellulosic biofuel. Blended feedstock with switchgrass and corn stover (harvested by either a two- or three-pass method) are considered in a Mixed Integer Linear Programming model to deliver on-spec biomass that considers both, a desired quantity and quality at the biorefinery. The model solves for a network of varying size depots that supply to biorefineries of 725,000 dry tons/year. A total delivered feedstock cost that is less than 79.07 dollars per dry tons (2016 dollars) is evaluated for years 2022, 2030, and 2040. In 2022, 124 depots and 59 biorefineries could be supplied with 42.8 million dt of corn stover and switchgrass. In 2030 and 2040, the total accessible biomass could increase to 215% and 393% respectively when compared to 2022. However, an 8 dollar per dry tons reduction in targeted delivery cost could reduce total accessible biomass by 67%. Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas were identified as potential states with a strong biofuel economy given that they had six or more biorefineries located in all scenarios. In some scenarios, Colorado, Alabama, Georgia, Minnesota, Mississippi and South Carolina would greatly benefit from a depot network as these could only deliver to a biorefinery in a nearby state. To elaborate the impact of a nationwide consideration, the findings were compared with existing literature for different US regions. We also present results for biorefinery capacities that are double, triple and quadruple in size.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office; USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725; AC07-05ID14517
OSTI ID:
1817493
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1781427
Journal Information:
Applied Energy, Vol. 294; ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (24)

Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain journal November 2009
Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrocarbons: Dilute-Acid and Enzymatic Deconstruction of Biomass to Sugars and Biological Conversion of Sugars to Hydrocarbons report October 2013
Biomass feedstock preprocessing and long-distance transportation logistics journal March 2015
Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs journal April 2013
A packed bed Ammonia Fiber Expansion reactor system for pretreatment of agricultural residues at regional depots journal January 2013
Biomass supply chain management in North Carolina (part 2): biomass feedstock logistical optimization journal January 2016
Optimal blending management of biomass resources used for biochemical conversion: Optimal Blending Management of Biomass journal April 2018
A distributed cellulosic biorefinery system in the US Midwest based on corn stover journal September 2016
Simultaneous application of predictive model and least cost formulation can substantially benefit biorefineries outside Corn Belt in United States: A case study in Florida journal January 2019
Strategic supply system design - a holistic evaluation of operational and production cost for a biorefinery supply chain: Strategic biorefinery feedstock supply system design journal August 2015
Cost and profit impacts of modifying stover harvest operations to improve feedstock quality journal May 2019
Design of biofuel supply chains with variable regional depot and biorefinery locations journal January 2017
Single- and Two-Pass Corn Grain and Stover Harvesting journal January 2012
Economic Optimization of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Supply Chain journal January 2012
A stochastic biomass blending problem in decentralized supply chains journal January 2021
2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy report July 2016
Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion journal January 2011
Distributed biomass supply chain cost optimization to evaluate multiple feedstocks for a biorefinery journal November 2019
Logistics system design for biomass-to-bioenergy industry with multiple types of feedstocks journal December 2011
GIS-based allocation of herbaceous biomass in biorefineries and depots journal February 2017
Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: Current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects journal August 2012
Impact of mixed feedstocks and feedstock densification on ionic liquid pretreatment efficiency journal January 2013
Comparing alternative cellulosic biomass biorefining systems: Centralized versus distributed processing systems journal March 2015
Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots journal October 2015