skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The cold high-pressure approach to hydrogen delivery

Journal Article · · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Univ. of Guanajuato (Mexico)
  2. Univ. of Guanajuato (Mexico)
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

In view of the very expensive and wasteful nature of today's approaches to H2 delivery, in this work we explore the possibility of transporting cold (200 K) high pressure (875 bar) H2 in thermally insulated trailers and dispensing H2 directly from the trailer, with the potential to eliminate station compressor, cascade, and refrigerator, leading to major reductions in station complexity, maintenance, electricity consumption, and cost, while improving functionality by enabling essentially unlimited back to back refuels, and improving safety due to reduced H2 expansion energy at low temperature. Detailed techno-economic analysis shows promise for substantial delivery cost reductions through cold high pressure H2 dispensed directly from the trailer. Results indicate that: (1) Terminal operations for cold high pressure H2 delivery are $$\$$$$0.32/kg H2 more expensive than for 350 bar compressed gas delivery (today's lowest cost H2 delivery technology) due to higher level of pressurization (to 1000 bar) and chilling needs (to 165 K). (2) Trailer cost drops slightly ($$\$$$$0.73 vs. $$\$$$$0.81/kg H2 for a 350 bar trailer) due to increased capacity (1035 kg H2 delivered vs. 700 kg) compensating for increased capital cost ($$\$$$$906,900 for cold high pressure H2 vs. $$\$$$$634,000 for 350 bar trailer). (3) Cold hydrogen delivery presents major advantages in fueling station cost, reduced from $$\$$$$1.27 to $$\$$$$0.46/kg H2 due to elimination of major system components: compressor, cascade, and chiller. (4) Total compression cost (terminal + station) drops from $$\$$$$0.92/kg H2 ($$\$$$$0.32 terminal and $$\$$$$0.60 station) for 350 bar trailers to $$\$$$$0.55/kg H2 (all at the terminal) for cold high pressure H2. (5) Elimination of small-scale station compressors is the main contributor to reduced delivery cost due to their inefficiency, capital expense, and maintenance needs. In summary, total delivery cost reduction vs. 350 bar trailer equals $$\$$$$0.58/kg H2 (from $$\$$$$2.96 to 2.38/kg H2), equivalent to 24% of the total delivery cost. This large cost advantage will improve the economics of H2 vehicles facilitating the transition to a future of zero emission transportation.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344; AC52- 07NA27344
OSTI ID:
1736339
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1809554
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-809177; 1015389
Journal Information:
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 45, Issue 51; ISSN 0360-3199
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (21)

Impact of hydrogen refueling configurations and market parameters on the refueling cost of hydrogen journal August 2017
The evolution of size and cost of a hydrogen delivery infrastructure in Europe in the medium and long term journal July 2007
Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode journal February 2007
Cost assessment and evaluation of various hydrogen delivery scenarios journal May 2018
Techno-economic analysis of in-situ production by electrolysis, biomass gasification and delivery systems for Hydrogen Refuelling Stations: Rome case study journal August 2018
Hydrogen storage and delivery: Review of the state of the art technologies and risk and reliability analysis journal May 2019
Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility via compressed hydrogen trucks journal July 2019
Techno-economic and thermodynamic analysis of pre-cooling systems at gaseous hydrogen refueling stations journal December 2017
The storage performance of automotive cryo-compressed hydrogen vessels journal June 2019
The fill density of automotive cryo-compressed hydrogen vessels journal January 2019
Rapid high density cryogenic pressure vessel filling to 345 bar with a liquid hydrogen pump journal October 2018
Safe, long range, inexpensive and rapidly refuelable hydrogen vehicles with cryogenic pressure vessels journal February 2013
Hydrogen refueling station compression and storage optimization with tube-trailer deliveries journal November 2014
Design, economic evaluation, and market uncertainty analysis of LOHC-based, CO2 free, hydrogen delivery systems journal September 2020
Thermal effect and flow-through cooling of an adsorptive hydrogen delivery tank journal September 2016
Hydrogen storage technology options for fuel cell vehicles: Well-to-wheel costs, energy efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions journal November 2011
Delivery of cold hydrogen in glass fiber composite pressure vessels journal December 2009
Cold hydrogen delivery in glass fiber composite pressure vessels: Analysis, manufacture and testing journal July 2013
The isentropic expansion energy of compressed and cryogenic hydrogen journal December 2014
Thermodynamical analysis of a hydrogen fueling station via dynamic simulation journal July 2019
Development and integration of an equation-solving program for engineering thermodynamics courses: EES FOR ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS journal January 1993

Similar Records

Boil-off losses along LH2 pathway
Technical Report · Mon Apr 30 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · OSTI ID:1736339

Technoeconomic analysis of metal–organic frameworks for bulk hydrogen transportation
Journal Article · Tue Mar 23 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Energy & Environmental Science · OSTI ID:1736339

Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production System Development
Technical Report · Thu Mar 10 00:00:00 EST 2011 · OSTI ID:1736339