Recommendations for DOT 7A Type A Drum Closure and Drop Testing with Additional 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) Testing and Analysis
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)
The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) is in the process of developing recommendation for the U S. Department of Energy contractors and vendors who want to qualify drums as U S. Department of Transportation (DOT) 7A Type A to meet 49 CFR 173.465 drop testing requirements for fissile and non-ftssile material to maintain containment. Based on the finite element analysis (FEA) models, the safety features suffering the maximum damage that result in loss of containment are identified as the closure ring mechanism (in entirety), the top (mouth area) of the drum, and the lid (including the gasket). The maximum damage is measured in terms of the collective ability of these combined three safety features to maintain containment. As such, both drop testing and FEA were performed to determine the sensitivities of these safety features to drop variations. As part of this effort, a series of physical drop tests and FEAs were conducted at SRNL. These tests used Skolnik drums, CQ5508L (see Attachment 1), which are open DOT 7A Type A open- head carbon steel 208-liter (55-gallon) drums with 12-gauge bolted closure rings. Variables studied were (1) stress relief methods during closure ring installation, (2) content configurations, and (3) drum orientations during a 4-foot free fall. It should be noted that the Skolnik CQ5508L drums have a closure ring with a "V shaped" cross section. (1) The closure testing with analysis confirmed that closure stress relief by rapping is necessary to distribute the closure ring tension around the perimeter and to maintain sufficient closure pre-load for lid retention during 4-foot drops of the heavier packages (500 to 1,000 lbs). It was concluded that no specific style of stress relief is preferred (e g., multi-step rapping/torqueing process, heavy hits vs. light hits, hitting near closure vs. away), as long as no additional change in bolt torque occurs with additional rapping. (2) (3) Modeling indicated that maximum damage is a result of both: (2) content configuration and (3) drop orientation. The worst-case content configuration is one with an eccentrically loaded concentrated content mass. FEA modeling showed that the center- of-gravity over top (CGoT) with the eccentric content on the high side was the orientation of maximum damage relative to drum lid retention. In this content configuration (i.e., CGoT), FEA modeling showed payloads over 500 lbs were required to contain a load distribution plate between content and lid. Both analysis and testing showed the drum with distribution plate can pass the 4-foot CGoT drop.
- Research Organization:
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC09-08SR22470
- OSTI ID:
- 1568780
- Report Number(s):
- SRNL-STI-2016-00231; TRN: US2100465
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Impact of different standard type A7A drum closure-ring practices on gasket contraction and bolt closure distance - 15621
DropTests of 325 Pound 6M Packages