Tank Closure Cesium Removal Project CST Simulant Cesium Batch Contact Kinetics Test Results and Column Performance Predictions
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)
To evaluate the cesium removal capabilities of the caustic-washed R9120-B version of crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media from Savannah River Site (SRS) waste during Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) column processing, batch contact kinetics tests were performed at 23 °C in SRS Average simulant. Cesium loading kinetics data was also collected (in current and previous testing; King, et al., 2018a) using the same simulant for an older CST sample (IE- 911) which was caustic-washed by the vendor many years ago and was recently retrieved from drums stored at SRS. (Note that R9120-B and IE-911 are believed to be identical materials, after the R9120-B was caustic washed by SRNL, and differ only by particle size and manufacturing date, and thus can be considered different batches). Although cesium loading kinetics testing can be conducted more rigorously using dynamic column tests, the batch contact method requires less simulant and considerably less experimental effort. Average percent removal data for batch contact samples for the two CST batches are provided in Table ES-1. Faster cesium uptake was observed with IE-911, although the loading rates for the two media batches were similar. After 5.5 hours of CST contact, 81% cesium removal was observed with R9120-B versus 86% removal with IE-911. Although these differences are small, the trend is consistent across the timed results, with the larger bead material always loading slower. These seemingly small differences in percent removal are believed to have a large impact on the column performance. Cesium loading curves for the two CST batches are provided in Figure ES-1 below. Faster cesium loading with IE-911 CST is presumed to be associated with the smaller average particle diameter (408 μm mean volume diameter) versus R9120-B (572 μm diameter). Cesium loading kinetic data was needed to conduct column performance comparisons (i.e., model predictions) for the two CST batches.
- Research Organization:
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC09-08SR22470
- OSTI ID:
- 1519110
- Report Number(s):
- SRNL-STI-2019-00088
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Cesium Removal Performance Comparisons of Crystalline Silicotitanate Media Batches with Savannah River Site Waste Simulant
Cesium Removal Performance Comparisons of Crystalline Silicotitanate Media Batches with Savannah River Site Waste Simulant