skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections

Journal Article · · Atmosphere (Basel)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110432· OSTI ID:1507988

Climate modification by stratospheric SO2 injections, to form sulfate aerosols, may alter the spectral and angular distributions of the solar ultraviolet and visible radiation that reach the Earth’s surface, with potential consequences to environmental photobiology and photochemistry. We used modeling results from the CESM1(WACCM) stratospheric aerosol geoengineering large ensemble (GLENS) project, following the RCP8.5 emission scenario, and one geoengineering experiment with SO2 injections in the stratosphere, designed to keep surface temperatures at 2020 levels. Zonally and monthly averaged vertical profiles of O3, SO2, and sulfate aerosols, at 30 N and 70 N, served as input into a radiative transfer model, to compute biologically active irradiances for DNA damage (iDNA), UV index (UVI), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and two key tropospheric photodissociation coefficients (jO1D for O3 + hν (λ < 330 nm) → O(1D) + O2; and jNO2 for NO2 + hν (λ < 420 nm) → O(3P) + NO). We show that the geoengineering scenario is accompanied by substantial reductions in UV radiation. For example, comparing March 2080 to March 2020, iDNA decreased by 25% to 29% in the subtropics (30 N) and by 26% to 33% in the polar regions (70 N); UVI decreased by 19% to 20% at 30 N and 23% to 26% at 70 N; and jO1D decreased by 22% to 24% at 30 N and 35% to 40% at 70 N, with comparable contributions from sulfate scattering and stratospheric O3 recovery. Different responses were found for processes that depend on longer UV and visible wavelengths, as these are minimally affected by ozone; PAR and jNO2 were only slightly lower (9–12%) at 30 N, but much lower at 70 N (35–40%). Similar reductions were estimated for other months (June, September, and December). Large increases in the PAR diffuse-direct ratio occurred in agreement with previous studies. Absorption by SO2 gas had a small (~1%) effect on jO1D, iDNA, and UVI, and no effect on jNO2 and PAR.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1507988
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-138064; ATMOCZ
Journal Information:
Atmosphere (Basel), Vol. 9, Issue 11; ISSN 2073-4433
Publisher:
MDPICopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 15 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (44)

Response of a Deciduous Forest to the Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis journal March 2003
The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research journal September 2013
Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere journal January 2009
Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink journal April 2009
Measured UV spectra compared with discrete ordinate method simulations journal January 1994
CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project journal November 2018
Comparison of Models Used for UV Index Calculations journal June 1998
Responses of the tropospheric ozone and odd hydrogen radicals to column ozone change journal April 1988
Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere journal January 2015
Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM) journal December 2017
First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives journal December 2017
The Wavelengths in Sunlight Effective in Producing Skin Cancer: A Theoretical Analysis journal September 1974
The effect of volcanic aerosols on ultraviolet radiation in Antarctica journal January 1996
Ozone depletion and climate change: impacts on UV radiation journal January 2011
Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss journal December 2016
Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO 2 Injections journal December 2017
Enhancement of atmospheric radiation by an aerosol layer journal January 1992
Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds journal January 1987
El Chichon volcanic aerosols: Impact of radiative, thermal, and chemical perturbations journal January 1989
The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions journal January 2012
Effects of stratospheric ozone recovery on photochemistry and ozone air quality in the troposphere journal January 2014
Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering journal January 2018
Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate journal January 2016
Effect of aerosols and NO 2 concentration on ultraviolet actinic flux near Mexico City during MILAGRO: measurements and model calculations journal January 2013
Know Your Standard: Clarifying the CIE Erythema Action Spectrum journal January 2011
International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Model Intercomparison (IPMMI): Spectral actinic solar flux measurements and modeling journal January 2003
Analysis of two balloon experiments in coincidence with SAGE II in case of large stratospheric aerosol amount: Post-Pinatubo period journal January 1996
Impact of recent total ozone changes on tropospheric ozone photodissociation, hydroxyl radicals, and methane trends journal March 1992
Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO 2 with TiO 2 and SiO 2 aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering journal January 2016
Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? journal July 2006
The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations journal December 2017
Absorption Spectrum of DNA for Wavelengths Greater than 300 nm journal June 1981
Response of surface ozone over the continental United States to UV radiation declines from the expected recovery of stratospheric ozone journal October 2018
Sulfur injections for a cooler planet journal July 2017
Increased transmission of ultraviolet radiation to the surface due to stratospheric scattering journal April 1993
Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure journal August 2018
Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone journal January 2017
Effects of Different Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics journal May 2018
Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GeoMIP ozone response journal March 2014
Enhancements in biologically effective ultraviolet radiation following volcanic eruptions journal September 1992
Geoengineering: Whiter skies?: GEOENGINEERING WHITER SKIES journal June 2012
Sensitivity of tropospheric oxidants to global chemical and climate change journal January 1989
Heterogeneous reaction of N 2 O 5 with airborne TiO 2 particles and its implication for stratospheric particle injection journal January 2014
Depletion of stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic and Arctic: Responses of plants of polar terrestrial ecosystems to enhanced UV-B, an overview journal October 2005

Cited By (3)

Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing journal August 2019
Ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation, climate change and prospects for a sustainable future journal June 2019
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) journal January 2021

Figures / Tables (9)