An Assessment of the Economics of Future Electric Power Generation Options and the Implications for Fusion
This study examines the potential range of electric power costs for some major alternatives to fusion electric power generation when it is ultimately deployed in the middle of the 21st century and, thus, offers a perspective on the cost levels that fusion must achieve to be competitive. The alternative technologies include coal burning, coal gasification, natural gas, nuclear fission, and renewable energy. The cost of electricity (COE) from the alternatives to fusion should remain in the 30-50 mils/kWh (1999 dollars) range of today in carbon sequestration is not needed, 30-60 mils/kWh if sequestration is required, or as high as 75 mils/kWh for the worst-case scenario for cost uncertainty. The reference COE range for fusion was estimated at 70-100 nmils/kWh for 1- to 1.3-GW(e) scale power plants. Fusion costs will have to be reduced and/or alternative concepts derived before fusion will be competitive with the alternatives for the future production of electricity. Fortunately, there are routes to achieve this goal.
- Research Organization:
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Science (US)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-96OR22464
- OSTI ID:
- 14035
- Report Number(s):
- ORNL/TM-1999/243; TRN: US0110954
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: 1 Sep 1999
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
An Assessment of the Economics of Future Electric Power Generation Options and the Implications for Fusion
A Study of Options for the Deployment of Large Fusion Power Plants
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT
03 NATURAL GAS
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS
COAL
COAL GASIFICATION
ECONOMICS
NATURAL GAS
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
THERMONUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
CARBON DIOXIDE
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
COMPETITION
POWER GENERATION