DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cross-machine comparison of runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up for extrapolation to ITER

Abstract

A cross-machine comparison of global parameters that determine the runaway electron (RE) generation and loss process during tokamak start-up was carried out with the aim to extrapolate these to ITER. The study found that all considered discharges, also those that do not show signs of RE, are non-thermal at the start, i.e. have a streaming parameter larger than 0.1. During the current ramp-up the electric field, E, remains above the critical value, Ec, that allows RE in the plasma. The distinction to be made is not if RE can form but, if sufficient RE can form fast enough such that they are detected or start to dominate the dynamics of the tokamak discharge. The dynamics of the value of E, density and temperature during tokamak are key to the formation of RE. It was found that larger devices operate with E closer to Ec, due to their higher temperatures, hence the RE generation is relatively slower. The slower time scales for the formation of RE, estimated to be of the order of 100s of ms in ITER simplifies the development of avoidance schemes. The RE confinement time is also an important determinant of the entire process and is found tomore » increase with the device size. The study also revealed that drift orbit losses, a mechanism often attributed as the main RE loss mechanism during the early tokamak discharge, are actually more difficult to achieve. RE losses might be more likely attributed to RE diffusion due to magnetic turbulence.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2];  [4];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [5]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [8];  [9]
  1. ITER Organization, St. Paul Lez Durance (France)
  2. Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (Korea, Republic of); Seoul National Univ. (Korea, Republic of)
  3. Joint Stock Company NIIEFA (Russian Federation); Saint Petersburg State University (Russian Federation)
  4. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
  5. CEA, IRFM, Saint Paul Lez Durance (France)
  6. UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), Culham (United Kingdom)
  7. National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA) (Italy)
  8. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Cambridge, MA (United States)
  9. Univ. Carlos III de Madrid (Spain)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Contributing Org.:
ITPA IOS Collaborators
OSTI Identifier:
1992114
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-09CH11466; SC0014264
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Fusion
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 63; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5515
Publisher:
IOP Science
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; tokamak; plasma initiation; current ramp-up; runaway electrons

Citation Formats

de Vries, P. C., Lee, Y., Gribov, Y., Mineev, A. B., Na, Y. S., Granetz, R., Stein-Lubrano, B., Reux, C., Moreau, Ph, Kiptily, V., Esposito, B., Battaglia, D. J., and Martin-Solis, J. R. Cross-machine comparison of runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up for extrapolation to ITER. United States: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/acdd11.
de Vries, P. C., Lee, Y., Gribov, Y., Mineev, A. B., Na, Y. S., Granetz, R., Stein-Lubrano, B., Reux, C., Moreau, Ph, Kiptily, V., Esposito, B., Battaglia, D. J., & Martin-Solis, J. R. Cross-machine comparison of runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up for extrapolation to ITER. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acdd11
de Vries, P. C., Lee, Y., Gribov, Y., Mineev, A. B., Na, Y. S., Granetz, R., Stein-Lubrano, B., Reux, C., Moreau, Ph, Kiptily, V., Esposito, B., Battaglia, D. J., and Martin-Solis, J. R. Tue . "Cross-machine comparison of runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up for extrapolation to ITER". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acdd11. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1992114.
@article{osti_1992114,
title = {Cross-machine comparison of runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up for extrapolation to ITER},
author = {de Vries, P. C. and Lee, Y. and Gribov, Y. and Mineev, A. B. and Na, Y. S. and Granetz, R. and Stein-Lubrano, B. and Reux, C. and Moreau, Ph and Kiptily, V. and Esposito, B. and Battaglia, D. J. and Martin-Solis, J. R.},
abstractNote = {A cross-machine comparison of global parameters that determine the runaway electron (RE) generation and loss process during tokamak start-up was carried out with the aim to extrapolate these to ITER. The study found that all considered discharges, also those that do not show signs of RE, are non-thermal at the start, i.e. have a streaming parameter larger than 0.1. During the current ramp-up the electric field, E, remains above the critical value, Ec, that allows RE in the plasma. The distinction to be made is not if RE can form but, if sufficient RE can form fast enough such that they are detected or start to dominate the dynamics of the tokamak discharge. The dynamics of the value of E, density and temperature during tokamak are key to the formation of RE. It was found that larger devices operate with E closer to Ec, due to their higher temperatures, hence the RE generation is relatively slower. The slower time scales for the formation of RE, estimated to be of the order of 100s of ms in ITER simplifies the development of avoidance schemes. The RE confinement time is also an important determinant of the entire process and is found to increase with the device size. The study also revealed that drift orbit losses, a mechanism often attributed as the main RE loss mechanism during the early tokamak discharge, are actually more difficult to achieve. RE losses might be more likely attributed to RE diffusion due to magnetic turbulence.},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/acdd11},
journal = {Nuclear Fusion},
number = 8,
volume = 63,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jun 27 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Tue Jun 27 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Kinetic modelling of runaway electrons in dynamic scenarios
journal, July 2016


External inductance of an axisymmetric plasma
journal, January 1986

  • Hirshman, S. P.; Neilson, G. H.
  • Physics of Fluids, Vol. 29, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.865934

Particle drifts and the transition to containment in the LT-3 Tokamak
journal, November 1974


Experimental investigation of runaway electron generation in TEXTOR
journal, December 1993


Overview of the FTU results
journal, June 2017


Density limits in toroidal plasmas
journal, July 2002


Operating a full tungsten actively cooled tokamak: overview of WEST first phase of operation
journal, February 2022


On the measurement of the threshold electric field for runaway electron generation in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade
journal, December 2016

  • Popovic, Z.; Esposito, B.; Martín-Solís, J. R.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4968839

Relativistic limitations on runaway electrons
journal, June 1975


On the relativistic large-angle electron collision operator for runaway avalanches in plasmas
journal, January 2018


Stability analysis of runaway-driven waves in a tokamak
journal, March 2015


ITER breakdown and plasma initiation revisited
journal, August 2019


Effect of Partially Screened Nuclei on Fast-Electron Dynamics
journal, June 2017


Electron Heat Transport in a Tokamak with Destroyed Magnetic Surfaces
journal, January 1978


Theory for avalanche of runaway electrons in tokamaks
journal, October 1997


Diffusion of runaway electrons in TEXTOR-94
journal, August 1998

  • Entrop, I.; Cardozo, N. J. Lopes; Jaspers, R.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 40, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/40/8/005

Experimental Observation of Increased Threshold Electric Field for Runaway Generation due to Synchrotron Radiation Losses in the FTU Tokamak
journal, October 2010


Runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up
journal, June 2022


Reduced model for direct induction startup scenario development on MAST-U and NSTX-U
journal, October 2019


Generalized collision operator for fast electrons interacting with partially ionized impurities
journal, November 2018


Runaway electron generation and control
journal, November 2016


Modelling of ohmic startup and runaway electron formation in support of JT-60SA initial operation
journal, December 2022


Physics of runaway electrons in tokamaks
journal, June 2019

  • Breizman, Boris N.; Aleynikov, Pavel; Hollmann, Eric M.
  • Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 59, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab1822

Low voltage Ohmic and electron cyclotron heating assisted startup in DIII-D
journal, November 1991


Characterisation of plasma breakdown at JET with a carbon and ITER-like wall
journal, April 2013


Nonlinear collisionless electron cyclotron interaction in the pre-ionisation stage
journal, April 2018


Low electric field plasma-current start-up in JT-60U
journal, January 1997


An ITPA joint experiment to study runaway electron generation and suppression
journal, July 2014

  • Granetz, R. S.; Esposito, B.; Kim, J. H.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4886802

Effective Critical Electric Field for Runaway-Electron Generation
journal, March 2015


Formation and termination of runaway beams in ITER disruptions
journal, April 2017


Dynamics of high energy runaway electrons in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade
journal, June 2003

  • Esposito, B.; Martı́n-Solı́s, J. R.; Poli, F. M.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1574328

The Commissioning of the WEST Tokamak: Experience and Lessons Learned
journal, June 2020

  • Moreau, P.; Bremond, S.; Bucalossi, J.
  • IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2020.2987160

Runaway electrons in toroidal discharges
journal, June 1979


Growth and decay of runaway electrons above the critical electric field under quiescent conditions
journal, February 2014

  • Paz-Soldan, C.; Eidietis, N. W.; Granetz, R.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4866912

Studies of Plasma Equilibrium and Transport in a Tokamak Fusion Device with the Inverse-Variable Technique
journal, December 1993

  • Khayrutdinov, R. R.; Lukash, V. E.
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 109, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1993.1211

Runaway electron beam generation and mitigation during disruptions at JET-ILW
journal, August 2015


Effect of partially ionized impurities and radiation on the effective critical electric field for runaway generation
journal, June 2018

  • Hesslow, L.; Embréus, O.; Wilkie, G. J.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aac33e

WEST regular in-vessel Inspections with the Articulated Inspection Arm robot
journal, September 2019


Runaway electron transport in the LT-3 tokamak
journal, November 1976


The effect of ITER-like wall on runaway electron generation in JET
journal, November 2013


Generation of runaway electrons during the thermal quench in tokamaks
journal, February 2017


Runaway electron transport via tokamak microturbulence
journal, October 2009


Islands of Runaway Electrons in the TEXTOR Tokamak and Relation to Transport in a Stochastic Field
journal, June 1994


Kink instabilities of the post-disruption runaway electron beam at low safety factor
journal, March 2019

  • Paz-Soldan, C.; Eidietis, N. W.; Liu, Y. Q.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 61, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aafd15

Analysis of runaway electron discharge formation during Joint European Torus plasma start-up
journal, October 2020

  • de Vries, P. C.; Gribov, Y.; Martin-Solis, R.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 62, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/abbe34

Runaway electron measurements in the JET tokamak
journal, December 1996

  • Esposito, B.; Solis, R. Martin; Belle, P. van
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 38, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/38/12/001

Evaluation of the Dreicer runaway generation rate in the presence of high- impurities using a neural network
journal, December 2019


Tore Supra/WEST Toroidal Field Coil Quench Following a Plasma Disruption With Runaway Electrons
journal, August 2019

  • Torre, Alexandre; Ciazynski, Daniel; Girard, Sylvain
  • IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 29, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2019.2911312

Runaway electrons and rational-q surfaces in a tokamak
journal, December 1983


ITER plasma control system final design and preparation for first plasma
journal, September 2021


Energy limits on runaway electrons in tokamak plasmas
journal, January 1999

  • Martín-Solís, J. R.; Esposito, B.; Sánchez, R.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.873276

Development of synthetic diagnostics for ITER First Plasma operation
journal, June 2021

  • Sinha, J.; De Vries, P. C.; Zabeo, L.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 63, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/abffb7

Theory of Two Threshold Fields for Relativistic Runaway Electrons
journal, April 2015


Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas. I
journal, July 1959


Kinetic modelling of start-up runaway electrons in KSTAR and ITER
journal, August 2023