DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression

Abstract

Earthquake monitoring in urban settings is essential but challenging, due to the strong anthropogenic noise inherent to urban seismic recordings. Here, we develop a deep-learning-based denoising algorithm, UrbanDenoiser, to filter out urban seismological noise. UrbanDenoiser strongly suppresses noise relative to the signals, because it was trained using waveform datasets containing rich noise sources from the urban Long Beach dense array and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) earthquake signals from the rural San Jacinto dense array. Application to the dense array data and an earthquake sequence in an urban area shows that UrbanDenoiser can increase signal quality and recover signals at an SNR level down to ~0 dB. Earthquake location using our denoised Long Beach data does not support the presence of mantle seismicity beneath Los Angeles but suggests a fault model featuring shallow creep, intermediate locking, and localized stress concentration at the base of the seismogenic zone.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Stanford Univ., CA (United States); Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China)
  2. Stanford Univ., CA (United States); JAMSTEC/YES, Yokohama (Japan)
  3. Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
OSTI Identifier:
1972029
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1904283; OSTI ID: 2267584
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0020445; 41888101; 41625016; 41904060
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Science Advances
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 8; Journal Issue: 15; Journal ID: ISSN 2375-2548
Publisher:
AAAS
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; Earthquakes; Denoising; Machine learning; Seismicity

Citation Formats

Yang, Lei, Liu, Xin, Zhu, Weiqiang, Zhao, Liang, and Beroza, Gregory C. Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3564.
Yang, Lei, Liu, Xin, Zhu, Weiqiang, Zhao, Liang, & Beroza, Gregory C. Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression. United States. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl3564
Yang, Lei, Liu, Xin, Zhu, Weiqiang, Zhao, Liang, and Beroza, Gregory C. Wed . "Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression". United States. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl3564. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1972029.
@article{osti_1972029,
title = {Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression},
author = {Yang, Lei and Liu, Xin and Zhu, Weiqiang and Zhao, Liang and Beroza, Gregory C.},
abstractNote = {Earthquake monitoring in urban settings is essential but challenging, due to the strong anthropogenic noise inherent to urban seismic recordings. Here, we develop a deep-learning-based denoising algorithm, UrbanDenoiser, to filter out urban seismological noise. UrbanDenoiser strongly suppresses noise relative to the signals, because it was trained using waveform datasets containing rich noise sources from the urban Long Beach dense array and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) earthquake signals from the rural San Jacinto dense array. Application to the dense array data and an earthquake sequence in an urban area shows that UrbanDenoiser can increase signal quality and recover signals at an SNR level down to ~0 dB. Earthquake location using our denoised Long Beach data does not support the presence of mantle seismicity beneath Los Angeles but suggests a fault model featuring shallow creep, intermediate locking, and localized stress concentration at the base of the seismogenic zone.},
doi = {10.1126/sciadv.abl3564},
journal = {Science Advances},
number = 15,
volume = 8,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 13 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Wed Apr 13 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Machine Learning in Seismology: Turning Data into Insights
journal, November 2018

  • Kong, Qingkai; Trugman, Daniel T.; Ross, Zachary E.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 90, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220180259

Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes
journal, August 2018


Earthquake Monitoring in Southern California for Seventy-Seven Years (1932-2008)
journal, March 2010

  • Hutton, K.; Woessner, J.; Hauksson, E.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 100, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120090130

Deep learning
journal, May 2015

  • LeCun, Yann; Bengio, Yoshua; Hinton, Geoffrey
  • Nature, Vol. 521, Issue 7553
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature14539

The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust
journal, June 2004

  • Nazareth, J. J.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 94, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120020129

Characteristics of Ground Motion Generated by Wind Interaction With Trees, Structures, and Other Surface Obstacles
journal, August 2019

  • Johnson, Christopher W.; Meng, Haoran; Vernon, Frank
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB017151

Reliable Real‐Time Seismic Signal/Noise Discrimination With Machine Learning
journal, January 2019

  • Meier, Men‐Andrin; Ross, Zachary E.; Ramachandran, Anshul
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 124, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016661

Localized seismic deformation in the upper mantle revealed by dense seismic arrays
journal, October 2016


High-resolution seismic event detection using local similarity for Large-N arrays
journal, January 2018


Deep fault plane geometry inferred from multiplet relative relocation beneath the south flank of Kilauea
journal, January 1994

  • Got, J. -L.; Fréchet, J.; Klein, Fred W.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, Issue B8
  • DOI: 10.1029/94JB00577

Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking
journal, August 2020

  • Mousavi, S. Mostafa; Ellsworth, William L.; Zhu, Weiqiang
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w

A comparison of earthquake backprojection imaging methods for dense local arrays
journal, December 2017

  • Beskardes, G. D.; Hole, J. A.; Wang, K.
  • Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 212, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx520

The Use of Wavelet-Based Denoising Techniques to Enhance the First-Arrival Picking on Seismic Traces
journal, August 2014


Basic data features and results from a spatially dense seismic array on the San Jacinto fault zone
journal, May 2015

  • Ben-Zion, Yehuda; Vernon, Frank L.; Ozakin, Yaman
  • Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 202, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv142

A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California
journal, December 2000

  • Waldhauser, F.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 90, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120000006

PhaseLink: A Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase Association
journal, January 2019

  • Ross, Zachary E.; Yue, Yisong; Meier, Men‐Andrin
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 124, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016674

Automatic microseismic denoising and onset detection using the synchrosqueezed continuous wavelet transform
journal, July 2016

  • Mousavi, S. Mostafa; Langston, Charles A.; Horton, Stephen P.
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 81, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0598.1

Detection of random noise and anatomy of continuous seismic waveforms in dense array data near Anza California
journal, July 2019

  • Meng, Haoran; Ben-Zion, Yehuda; Johnson, Christopher W.
  • Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 219, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz349

Denoising seismic data using the nonlocal means algorithm
journal, January 2012


Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location
journal, February 2018

  • Perol, Thibaut; Gharbi, Michaël; Denolle, Marine
  • Science Advances, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700578

Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks
journal, November 2019

  • Zhu, Weiqiang; Mousavi, S. Mostafa; Beroza, Gregory C.
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 57, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772

Revisiting evidence for widespread seismicity in the upper mantle under Los Angeles
journal, January 2021


Unified Structural Representation of the southern California crust and upper mantle
journal, April 2015


Deep Clustering to Identify Sources of Urban Seismic Noise in Long Beach, California
journal, December 2020

  • Snover, Dylan; Johnson, Christopher W.; Bianco, Michael J.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 92, Issue 2A
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220200164

Deep Learning Denoising Applied to Regional Distance Seismic Data in Utah
journal, January 2021

  • Tibi, Rigobert; Hammond, Patrick; Brogan, Ronald
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 111, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120200292

Searching for hidden earthquakes in Southern California
journal, April 2019