DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems

Abstract

The role of energy storage systems (ESSs) is becoming increasingly important for today’s electric power systems. Unavailability of an ESS assigned to critical grid services may cause unwanted disruption of those services and hence, may have a significant techno-economic impact. Like any physical equipment, an ESS is vulnerable to various types of faults. Failure of one or more strings in a multistring ESS does not have to be the cause of shutting down the entire ESS. It can still operate with a partial number of strings and continue providing critical services to the grid, if there are no reliability or safety issues and is acceptable under applicable standards. However, it is important to make sure that the control strategies are adaptable to the changes in ESS capacity caused by failed strings. Also, depending on the previous operation and type of failure, the reallocation of duty cycle burden among available strings could be non-uniform. These complexities suggest that mitigation of the impact of partial failure in multistring ESSs is not trivial and needs careful consideration. This is the topic of this paper. The proposed work investigates the impact of partial failure of a large multistring ESS on the assigned service andmore » develops strategies to adjust the ESS control duty cycles for reducing such impacts. In doing so, the paper proposes a novel two-stage framework that plans for the multistring failure using robust optimization theory and then adjusts in real-time using a rule-based algorithm, based on the real-time information on the power availability of the string. Illustrations provided in this work are based on frequency regulation use-case, which is a common application for many utility-scale ESSs. A 750 kilowatt (kW)/1500 kilowatt-hour (kWh) 3-string ESS is used for the demonstration in this work and the efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated and compared against methods that do not incorporate string failure in their strategy. In particular, here we show that revenue loss of 93% can be incurred when partial string failure is not included in operation and planning. These losses in revenue are reduced by 60% with the proposed method.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1908652
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1868767
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-162124
Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Applied Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 307; Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE; multistring energy storage systems; partial string failure; two-stage decision making algorithm; techno-economic impact

Citation Formats

Hanif, Sarmad, Alam, M. J.E., Fotedar, Vanshika, Crawford, Alasdair, Vartanian, Charlie, and Viswanathan, Vilayanur. Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118196.
Hanif, Sarmad, Alam, M. J.E., Fotedar, Vanshika, Crawford, Alasdair, Vartanian, Charlie, & Viswanathan, Vilayanur. Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118196
Hanif, Sarmad, Alam, M. J.E., Fotedar, Vanshika, Crawford, Alasdair, Vartanian, Charlie, and Viswanathan, Vilayanur. Thu . "Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118196. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1908652.
@article{osti_1908652,
title = {Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems},
author = {Hanif, Sarmad and Alam, M. J.E. and Fotedar, Vanshika and Crawford, Alasdair and Vartanian, Charlie and Viswanathan, Vilayanur},
abstractNote = {The role of energy storage systems (ESSs) is becoming increasingly important for today’s electric power systems. Unavailability of an ESS assigned to critical grid services may cause unwanted disruption of those services and hence, may have a significant techno-economic impact. Like any physical equipment, an ESS is vulnerable to various types of faults. Failure of one or more strings in a multistring ESS does not have to be the cause of shutting down the entire ESS. It can still operate with a partial number of strings and continue providing critical services to the grid, if there are no reliability or safety issues and is acceptable under applicable standards. However, it is important to make sure that the control strategies are adaptable to the changes in ESS capacity caused by failed strings. Also, depending on the previous operation and type of failure, the reallocation of duty cycle burden among available strings could be non-uniform. These complexities suggest that mitigation of the impact of partial failure in multistring ESSs is not trivial and needs careful consideration. This is the topic of this paper. The proposed work investigates the impact of partial failure of a large multistring ESS on the assigned service and develops strategies to adjust the ESS control duty cycles for reducing such impacts. In doing so, the paper proposes a novel two-stage framework that plans for the multistring failure using robust optimization theory and then adjusts in real-time using a rule-based algorithm, based on the real-time information on the power availability of the string. Illustrations provided in this work are based on frequency regulation use-case, which is a common application for many utility-scale ESSs. A 750 kilowatt (kW)/1500 kilowatt-hour (kWh) 3-string ESS is used for the demonstration in this work and the efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated and compared against methods that do not incorporate string failure in their strategy. In particular, here we show that revenue loss of 93% can be incurred when partial string failure is not included in operation and planning. These losses in revenue are reduced by 60% with the proposed method.},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118196},
journal = {Applied Energy},
number = ,
volume = 307,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Dec 02 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Thu Dec 02 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Using Battery Storage for Peak Shaving and Frequency Regulation: Joint Optimization for Superlinear Gains
journal, May 2018


Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) and Battery Management System (BMS) for Grid-Scale Applications
journal, June 2014

  • Lawder, Matthew T.; Suthar, Bharatkumar; Northrop, Paul W. C.
  • Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 102, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2317451

Real-Time Demand Response Model
journal, December 2010

  • Conejo, Antonio J.; Morales, Juan M.; Baringo, Luis
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 1, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2010.2078843

Stochastic Multistage Coplanning of Transmission Expansion and Energy Storage
journal, January 2017


A novel model and experimental validation of dust impact on grid-connected photovoltaic system performance in Northern Oman
journal, August 2020


Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid—A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids
journal, December 2017

  • Hesse, Holger; Schimpe, Michael; Kucevic, Daniel
  • Energies, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.3390/en10122107

Robust optimization ? methodology and applications
journal, May 2002

  • Ben-Tal, Aharon; Nemirovski, Arkadi
  • Mathematical Programming, Vol. 92, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s101070100286

Robust Optimization of Storage Investment on Transmission Networks
journal, January 2015

  • Jabr, Rabih A.; Dzafic, Izudin; Pal, Bikash C.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2326557

An Evaluation of Energy Storage Cost and Performance Characteristics
journal, June 2020

  • Mongird, Kendall; Viswanathan, Vilayanur; Balducci, Patrick
  • Energies, Vol. 13, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.3390/en13133307

Assigning value to energy storage systems at multiple points in an electrical grid
journal, January 2018

  • Balducci, Patrick J.; Alam, M. Jan E.; Hardy, Trevor D.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 11, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/C8EE00569A

A Comparison of Grid-Connected Battery Energy Storage System Designs
journal, September 2017

  • Chatzinikolaou, Efstratios; Rogers, Daniel J.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 32, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2629020

PV System Predictive Maintenance: Challenges, Current Approaches, and Opportunities
journal, March 2020

  • Bosman, Lisa B.; Leon-Salas, Walter D.; Hutzel, William
  • Energies, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3390/en13061398

Impact of cell balance on grid scale battery energy storage systems
journal, May 2020


Modeling storage and demand management in power distribution grids
journal, December 2011


Robust Operation of Energy Storage System with Uncertain Load Profiles
journal, March 2017

  • Kim, Jangkyum; Choi, Yohwan; Ryu, Seunghyoung
  • Energies, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.3390/en10040416

Tutorial on Stochastic Optimization in Energy—Part II: An Energy Storage Illustration
journal, March 2016


Energy Storage Control Capability Expansion: Achieving Better Technoeconomic Benefits at Portland General Electric's Salem Smart Power Center
journal, March 2020

  • Alam, Jan; Balducci, Patrick; Whitener, Kevin
  • IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/MPE.2019.2959115

The Price of Robustness
journal, February 2004


A comprehensive study on different types of faults and detection techniques for solar photovoltaic system
journal, December 2017


An economic assessment of behind-the-meter photovoltaics paired with batteries on the Hawaiian Islands
journal, March 2021


Tutorial on Stochastic Optimization in Energy—Part I: Modeling and Policies
journal, March 2016


Risk Measure Based Robust Bidding Strategy for Arbitrage Using a Wind Farm and Energy Storage
journal, December 2013

  • Thatte, Anupam A.; Xie, Le; Viassolo, Daniel E.
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 4, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2271283

Robust Multi-Period OPF With Storage and Renewables
journal, September 2015

  • Jabr, Rabih A.; Karaki, Sami; Korbane, Joe Akl
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 30, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2365835

Analyzing system safety in lithium-ion grid energy storage
journal, December 2015


Predictive-Maintenance Practices: For Operational Safety of Battery Energy Storage Systems
journal, November 2020

  • Fioravanti, Richard; Kumar, Kiran; Nakata, Shinobu
  • IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, Vol. 18, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1109/MPE.2020.3014542