DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms

Abstract

Cull sows are a unique population on swine farms, often representing poor producing or compromised animals, and even though recent studies have reported that the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to diseases, the microbiome of the cull sow population has not been explored. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in fecal and upper respiratory tract microbiota composition for groups of sows of different health status (healthy, cull, and compromised/ clinical sows) and from different farms (1 to 6). Six swine farms were visited once. Thirty individual fecal samples and nasal swabs were obtained at each farm and pooled by five across health status and farm. Samples underwent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and nasal and fecal microbiota were analyzed using QIIME2 v.2021.4. Overall, the diversity of the nasal microbiota was lower than the fecal microbiota (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in fecal or nasal alpha diversity by sow’s health status or by farm. Furthermore, there were significant differences in nasal microbial composition by farm and health status (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), and in fecal microbiota by farm (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), but not by health status. Lastly, at the L7 level, there was one differentially abundantmore » taxa across farms for each nasal and fecal pooled samples. This study provided baseline information for nasal and fecal microbiota of sows under field conditions, and results suggest that farm of origin can affect microbial diversity and composition. Furthermore, sow’s health status may have an impact on the nasal microbiota composition.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [3];  [1]
  1. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)
  2. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program
OSTI Identifier:
1835778
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-20-28622
Journal ID: ISSN 2167-8359
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
PeerJ
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 2167-8359
Publisher:
PeerJ Inc.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; Agricultural science; Bioinformatics; Microbiology; Veterinary medicine; Swine; Swine microbiota; Nasal and fecal microbiota; Cull sows; Swine health

Citation Formats

Arruda, Andreia G., Deblais, Loic, Hale, Vanessa L., Madden, Christopher, Pairis-Garcia, Monique, Srivastava, Vishal, Kathayat, Dipak, Kumar, Anand, and Rajashekara, Gireesh. A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.7717/peerj.12120.
Arruda, Andreia G., Deblais, Loic, Hale, Vanessa L., Madden, Christopher, Pairis-Garcia, Monique, Srivastava, Vishal, Kathayat, Dipak, Kumar, Anand, & Rajashekara, Gireesh. A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms. United States. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12120
Arruda, Andreia G., Deblais, Loic, Hale, Vanessa L., Madden, Christopher, Pairis-Garcia, Monique, Srivastava, Vishal, Kathayat, Dipak, Kumar, Anand, and Rajashekara, Gireesh. Fri . "A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms". United States. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12120. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1835778.
@article{osti_1835778,
title = {A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms},
author = {Arruda, Andreia G. and Deblais, Loic and Hale, Vanessa L. and Madden, Christopher and Pairis-Garcia, Monique and Srivastava, Vishal and Kathayat, Dipak and Kumar, Anand and Rajashekara, Gireesh},
abstractNote = {Cull sows are a unique population on swine farms, often representing poor producing or compromised animals, and even though recent studies have reported that the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to diseases, the microbiome of the cull sow population has not been explored. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in fecal and upper respiratory tract microbiota composition for groups of sows of different health status (healthy, cull, and compromised/ clinical sows) and from different farms (1 to 6). Six swine farms were visited once. Thirty individual fecal samples and nasal swabs were obtained at each farm and pooled by five across health status and farm. Samples underwent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and nasal and fecal microbiota were analyzed using QIIME2 v.2021.4. Overall, the diversity of the nasal microbiota was lower than the fecal microbiota (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in fecal or nasal alpha diversity by sow’s health status or by farm. Furthermore, there were significant differences in nasal microbial composition by farm and health status (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), and in fecal microbiota by farm (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), but not by health status. Lastly, at the L7 level, there was one differentially abundant taxa across farms for each nasal and fecal pooled samples. This study provided baseline information for nasal and fecal microbiota of sows under field conditions, and results suggest that farm of origin can affect microbial diversity and composition. Furthermore, sow’s health status may have an impact on the nasal microbiota composition.},
doi = {10.7717/peerj.12120},
journal = {PeerJ},
number = ,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Fri Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Locating rearrangement events in a phylogeny based on highly fragmented assemblies
journal, January 2016


Development and Function of the Intestinal Microbiome and Potential Implications for Pig Production
journal, February 2019

  • Nowland, Tanya; Plush, Kate; Barton, Mary
  • Animals, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3390/ani9030076

The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
journal, November 2012

  • Quast, Christian; Pruesse, Elmar; Yilmaz, Pelin
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 41, Issue D1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1219

The pig gut microbial diversity: Understanding the pig gut microbial ecology through the next generation high throughput sequencing
journal, June 2015


Role of the microbiome in swine respiratory disease
journal, September 2017


Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2
journal, July 2019


Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Postweaning Piglets: Understanding the Keys to Health
journal, October 2017

  • Gresse, Raphaële; Chaucheyras-Durand, Frédérique; Fleury, Mickaël Alain
  • Trends in Microbiology, Vol. 25, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004

Sow culling and mortality in commercial swine breeding herds
journal, July 1990


DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
journal, May 2016

  • Callahan, Benjamin J.; McMurdie, Paul J.; Rosen, Michael J.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 13, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869

Potential Role of the Bovine Rumen Microbiome in Modulating Milk Composition and Feed Efficiency
journal, January 2014


The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease
journal, May 2009

  • Round, June L.; Mazmanian, Sarkis K.
  • Nature Reviews Immunology, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nri2515

Inhibitory effect of zingiber officinale towards Streptococcus mutans virulence and caries development: in vitro and in vivo studies
journal, January 2015


The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks
journal, November 2013

  • Yilmaz, Pelin; Parfrey, Laura Wegener; Yarza, Pablo
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 42, Issue D1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209

Genome Insight and Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of Nesterenkonia jeotgali Strain CD08_7 Isolated from Duodenal Mucosa of Celiac Disease Patient
journal, February 2017


Early-Life Environmental Variation Affects Intestinal Microbiota and Immune Development in New-Born Piglets
journal, June 2014


Differential Analysis of the Nasal Microbiome of Pig Carriers or Non-Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus
journal, August 2016


Dysbiosis of lower respiratory tract microbiome are associated with inflammation and microbial function variety
journal, December 2019


A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life
journal, August 2018

  • Parks, Donovan H.; Chuvochina, Maria; Waite, David W.
  • Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 36, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4229

Novel Imidazole and Methoxybenzylamine Growth Inhibitors Affecting Salmonella Cell Envelope Integrity and its Persistence in Chickens
journal, September 2018


Shifts in the nasal microbiota of swine in response to different dosing regimens of oxytetracycline administration
journal, October 2019


Antimicrobial removal on piglets promotes health and higher bacterial diversity in the nasal microbiota
journal, April 2019

  • Correa-Fiz, Florencia; Gonçalves dos Santos, José Maurício; Illas, Francesc
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43022-y

Meta-analysis To Define a Core Microbiota in the Swine Gut
journal, June 2017


Detection of clonal antigen receptor gene rearrangement in dogs with lymphoma by real-time polymerase chain reaction and melting curve analysis
journal, January 2014

  • Langner, Kathrin FA; Joetzke, Alexa E.; Nerschbach, Verena
  • BMC Veterinary Research, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-1