DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land

Abstract

Using land already enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in the eastern region of the U.S. for producing energy crops for bioenergy while reducing land rental payments offers the potential for lowering the program costs, increasing returns to CRP landowners, and displacing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuels. We develop an integrated modeling approach to analyze the combination of biomass prices and CRP land rental payment reductions that can incentivize energy crop production on CRP land and its potential to increase soil carbon stocks and displace fossil fuel emissions. Here, we find that conversion of 3.4 million ha in the CRP can be economically viable at a minimum biomass price of 75 Mg–1 with full CRP land rental payment or at 100 Mg–1 with 75% of this land rental payment; this conversion can result in savings of 0.52 and 1.25 billion Mg CO2-eq in life-cycle emissions through the displacement of energy-equivalent fossil fuels and coal-based electricity, respectively, and an additional 0.11 billion Mg CO2-eq soil carbon sequestration relative to the status quo, with CRP left unharvested over the 2016–2030 period. The soil carbon debt due to the transition from unharvested CRP land to energy crops is short-lived andmore » more than offset by the reduction in fossil fuel emissions. The net discounted benefits from producing energy crops on CRP land through a reduced need for government payments to maintain existing enrollment, higher returns to CRP landowners, and the value of the reduction in GHG emissions could be as high as 16–30 billion by using them for cellulosic biofuels to displace gasoline and 35–68 billion by displacing coal-based electricity over the 2016–2030 period if biomass prices are 75–125 Mg–1 and land rental payments are reduced by 25%.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)
  2. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States); Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID (United States)
  3. United States Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI), Urbana, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1760683
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0018420
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 55; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0013-936X
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Soils; biomass; energy; crops; carbon fiber

Citation Formats

Chen, Luoye, Blanc-Betes, Elena, Hudiburg, Tara W., Hellerstein, Daniel, Wallander, Steven, DeLucia, Evan H., and Khanna, Madhu. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06133.
Chen, Luoye, Blanc-Betes, Elena, Hudiburg, Tara W., Hellerstein, Daniel, Wallander, Steven, DeLucia, Evan H., & Khanna, Madhu. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06133
Chen, Luoye, Blanc-Betes, Elena, Hudiburg, Tara W., Hellerstein, Daniel, Wallander, Steven, DeLucia, Evan H., and Khanna, Madhu. Thu . "Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06133. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1760683.
@article{osti_1760683,
title = {Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land},
author = {Chen, Luoye and Blanc-Betes, Elena and Hudiburg, Tara W. and Hellerstein, Daniel and Wallander, Steven and DeLucia, Evan H. and Khanna, Madhu},
abstractNote = {Using land already enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in the eastern region of the U.S. for producing energy crops for bioenergy while reducing land rental payments offers the potential for lowering the program costs, increasing returns to CRP landowners, and displacing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuels. We develop an integrated modeling approach to analyze the combination of biomass prices and CRP land rental payment reductions that can incentivize energy crop production on CRP land and its potential to increase soil carbon stocks and displace fossil fuel emissions. Here, we find that conversion of 3.4 million ha in the CRP can be economically viable at a minimum biomass price of 75 Mg–1 with full CRP land rental payment or at 100 Mg–1 with 75% of this land rental payment; this conversion can result in savings of 0.52 and 1.25 billion Mg CO2-eq in life-cycle emissions through the displacement of energy-equivalent fossil fuels and coal-based electricity, respectively, and an additional 0.11 billion Mg CO2-eq soil carbon sequestration relative to the status quo, with CRP left unharvested over the 2016–2030 period. The soil carbon debt due to the transition from unharvested CRP land to energy crops is short-lived and more than offset by the reduction in fossil fuel emissions. The net discounted benefits from producing energy crops on CRP land through a reduced need for government payments to maintain existing enrollment, higher returns to CRP landowners, and the value of the reduction in GHG emissions could be as high as 16–30 billion by using them for cellulosic biofuels to displace gasoline and 35–68 billion by displacing coal-based electricity over the 2016–2030 period if biomass prices are 75–125 Mg–1 and land rental payments are reduced by 25%.},
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.0c06133},
journal = {Environmental Science and Technology},
number = 2,
volume = 55,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Thu Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Policy Shocks and Market‐Based Regulations: Evidence from the Renewable Fuel Standard
journal, February 2018

  • Lade, Gabriel E.; Lin Lawell, C. ‐Y. Cynthia; Smith, Aaron
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 100, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aax097

What Is the Cost of a Renewable Energy–Based Approach to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation?
journal, July 2017


Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
journal, February 2008


Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses
journal, March 2010


Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies
journal, May 2013


Measuring Indirect Land Use Change with Biofuels: Implications for Policy
journal, August 2012


Supply of cellulosic biomass in Illinois and implications for the Conservation Reserve Program
journal, December 2014


Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion
journal, July 2015

  • Hellwinckel, Chad; Clark, Christopher; Langholtz, Matthew
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12281

Impacts of management practices on bioenergy feedstock yield and economic feasibility on Conservation Reserve Program grasslands
journal, February 2016

  • Anderson, Eric K.; Aberle, Ezra; Chen, Chengci
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12328

Carbon debt of field-scale conservation reserve program grasslands converted to annual and perennial bioenergy crops
journal, February 2019

  • Abraha, Michael; Gelfand, Ilya; Hamilton, Stephen K.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aafc10

Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production
journal, August 2011

  • Gelfand, I.; Zenone, T.; Jasrotia, P.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017277108

Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops
journal, February 2009


Landscape control of nitrous oxide emissions during the transition from conservation reserve program to perennial grasses for bioenergy
journal, September 2016

  • Saha, Debasish; Rau, Benjamin M.; Kaye, Jason P.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12395

Reduced Nitrogen Losses after Conversion of Row Crop Agriculture to Perennial Biofuel Crops
journal, January 2013

  • Smith, Candice M.; David, Mark B.; Mitchell, Corey A.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0210

Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
journal, June 2017

  • Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L.
  • Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324

Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: potential yields and environmental effects
journal, April 2016

  • LeDuc, Stephen D.; Zhang, Xuesong; Clark, Christopher M.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12352

Altered Belowground Carbon Cycling Following Land-Use Change to Perennial Bioenergy Crops
journal, January 2013

  • Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.; Masters, Michael D.; Black, Christopher K.
  • Ecosystems, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10021-012-9628-x

The social inefficiency of regulating indirect land use change due to biofuels
journal, June 2017

  • Khanna, Madhu; Wang, Weiwei; Hudiburg, Tara W.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15513

Plant species composition and biofuel yields of conservation grasslands
journal, December 2009

  • Adler, Paul R.; Sanderson, Matt A.; Weimer, Paul J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 19, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1890/07-2094.1

Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
journal, February 2008


Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US
journal, January 2016


Generalized model for NO x and N 2 O emissions from soils
journal, August 2001

  • Parton, W. J.; Holland, E. A.; Del Grosso, S. J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2001JD900101

Life-Cycle Assessment of net Greenhouse-Gas flux for Bioenergy Cropping Systems
journal, April 2007

  • Adler, Paul R.; Grosso, Stephen J. Del; Parton, William J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1890/05-2018

Predicting methanogenesis from rice paddies using the DAYCENT ecosystem model
journal, July 2013


Simulating greenhouse gas mitigation potentials for Chinese Croplands using the DAYCENT ecosystem model
journal, December 2013

  • Cheng, Kun; Ogle, Stephen M.; Parton, William J.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 20, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12368

Using DAYCENT to quantify on-farm GHG emissions and N dynamics of land use conversion to N-managed switchgrass in the Southern U.S.
journal, May 2011

  • Chamberlain, Jim F.; Miller, Shelie A.; Frederick, James R.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 141, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.011

Assessing the Soil Carbon, Biomass Production, and Nitrous Oxide Emission Impact of Corn Stover Management for Bioenergy Feedstock Production Using DAYCENT
journal, February 2014

  • Campbell, Eleanor E.; Johnson, Jane M. F.; Jin, Virginia L.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9414-z

Predicting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Carbon from Changing Pasture to an Energy Crop
journal, August 2013


Alternative transportation fuel standards: Welfare effects and climate benefits
journal, May 2014

  • Chen, Xiaoguang; Huang, Haixiao; Khanna, Madhu
  • Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 67, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.09.006

Nitrate Leaching from Continuous Corn, Perennial Grasses, and Poplar in the US Midwest
journal, January 2019

  • Hussain, Mir Zaman; Bhardwaj, Ajay K.; Basso, Bruno
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2019.04.0156

Grassland bird response to harvesting switchgrass as a biomass energy crop
journal, May 2005