DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single- and multiple-feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks

Abstract

An integrated multi-feedstock bioenergy (i.e., biofuel, biopower, or bioproduct) supply system has potential to reduce biomass supply system uncertainties and costs. This study identifies optimal configurations of multi-feedstock biomass-to-biorefinery supply chains and pertinent feedstock combinations based on spatial distribution of feedstock and lowest delivered cost to the biorefinery. We used the Supply Characterization Model (SCM) to allocate feedstock supplies to candidate biorefinery facilities. Model runs were performed for herbaceous energy crops, agriculture residue, and woody biomass available in 2017, 2022, 2025, and 2030 as estimated by the Policy Analysis System (POLYSYS) and Forest Sustainable and Economic Analysis Model (ForSEAM) models. Three feedstock supply scenarios were compared: (a) an herbaceous scenario: switchgrass, miscanthus, biosorghum, and corn stover; (b) a woody scenario: coppice wood, noncoppice wood, whole trees, and forestry residues, and (c) a mixed scenario: a combination of all feedstocks in herbaceous and woody scenarios. By 2030 the analyses predicted that 323, 168, and 473 biorefineries were sited in the herbaceous, woody, and mixed scenario, respectively, in the conterminous USA. Feedstock mixes supplied to the biorefineries were mostly dominated by a single feedstock. The most prominent feedstock mixes identified were: (1) switchgrass and miscanthus; (2) coppice and noncoppice wood; and (3)more » coppice wood, noncoppice wood, switchgrass and miscanthus. Biorefineries using multi-feedstock would be beneficial for growth of bioeconomy, however flexible and cost-effective conversion platforms should be developed to efficiently utilize multiple feedstocks. This analysis identifies biorefinery locations and feedstock supply mixes while minimizing delivered feedstock costs based on spatial and temporal feedstock availability.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1632089
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 14; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS

Citation Formats

Sharma, Bhavna, Brandt, Craig, Amal, Devita, Langholtz, Matthew H., and Webb, Erin. Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single- and multiple-feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.2091.
Sharma, Bhavna, Brandt, Craig, Amal, Devita, Langholtz, Matthew H., & Webb, Erin. Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single- and multiple-feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2091
Sharma, Bhavna, Brandt, Craig, Amal, Devita, Langholtz, Matthew H., and Webb, Erin. Thu . "Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single- and multiple-feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2091. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1632089.
@article{osti_1632089,
title = {Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single- and multiple-feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks},
author = {Sharma, Bhavna and Brandt, Craig and Amal, Devita and Langholtz, Matthew H. and Webb, Erin},
abstractNote = {An integrated multi-feedstock bioenergy (i.e., biofuel, biopower, or bioproduct) supply system has potential to reduce biomass supply system uncertainties and costs. This study identifies optimal configurations of multi-feedstock biomass-to-biorefinery supply chains and pertinent feedstock combinations based on spatial distribution of feedstock and lowest delivered cost to the biorefinery. We used the Supply Characterization Model (SCM) to allocate feedstock supplies to candidate biorefinery facilities. Model runs were performed for herbaceous energy crops, agriculture residue, and woody biomass available in 2017, 2022, 2025, and 2030 as estimated by the Policy Analysis System (POLYSYS) and Forest Sustainable and Economic Analysis Model (ForSEAM) models. Three feedstock supply scenarios were compared: (a) an herbaceous scenario: switchgrass, miscanthus, biosorghum, and corn stover; (b) a woody scenario: coppice wood, noncoppice wood, whole trees, and forestry residues, and (c) a mixed scenario: a combination of all feedstocks in herbaceous and woody scenarios. By 2030 the analyses predicted that 323, 168, and 473 biorefineries were sited in the herbaceous, woody, and mixed scenario, respectively, in the conterminous USA. Feedstock mixes supplied to the biorefineries were mostly dominated by a single feedstock. The most prominent feedstock mixes identified were: (1) switchgrass and miscanthus; (2) coppice and noncoppice wood; and (3) coppice wood, noncoppice wood, switchgrass and miscanthus. Biorefineries using multi-feedstock would be beneficial for growth of bioeconomy, however flexible and cost-effective conversion platforms should be developed to efficiently utilize multiple feedstocks. This analysis identifies biorefinery locations and feedstock supply mixes while minimizing delivered feedstock costs based on spatial and temporal feedstock availability.},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.2091},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 3,
volume = 14,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Feb 27 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Thu Feb 27 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Sustainable bioethanol production combining biorefinery principles using combined raw materials from wheat undersown with clover-grass
journal, March 2008

  • Thomsen, Mette Hedegaard; Haugaard-Nielsen, Henrik
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 35, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0334-9

Bioconversion of lignocellulosic waste from selected dumping sites in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
journal, December 2005


2014 oil plunge: Causes and impacts on renewable energy
journal, February 2017

  • Khan, Muhammad Imran; Yasmeen, Tabassam; Shakoor, Abdul
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 68
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.026

Survey of Clustering Algorithms
journal, May 2005


A Geographic Information System-based modeling system for evaluating the cost of delivered energy crop feedstock
journal, April 2000


Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois
journal, June 2008


Enhanced Ethanol Production with Mixed Lignocellulosic Substrates from Commercial Furfural and Cassava Residues
journal, November 2014


SSF of steam-pretreated wheat straw with the addition of saccharified or fermented wheat meal in integrated bioethanol production
journal, January 2013

  • Erdei, Borbála; Hancz, Dóra; Galbe, Mats
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-169

The effects of single and combined cellulosic agrowaste substrates on bioethanol production
journal, October 2014


Wet oxidation pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of clover–ryegrass mixtures
journal, December 2008


Woody biomass potential for energy feedstock in United States
journal, April 2014

  • He, Lixia; English, Burton C.; De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G.
  • Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 20, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.04.002

Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future
journal, August 2013


Spatial modeling framework for bioethanol plant siting and biofuel production potential in the U.S
journal, April 2017


Mixed Feedstock Approach to Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production—Prospects and Limitations
journal, June 2016

  • Oke, Mushafau Adebayo; Annuar, Mohamad Suffian Mohamad; Simarani, Khanom
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-016-9765-8

Current Challenges in Commercially Producing Biofuels from Lignocellulosic Biomass
journal, January 2014


Spatial Analysis of Biomass Resources within a Socio-Ecologically Heterogeneous Region: Identifying Opportunities for a Mixed Feedstock Stream
journal, February 2014

  • Calvert, Kirby; Mabee, Warren
  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3390/ijgi3010209

Optimal configuration and combination of multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks delivery to a biorefinery
journal, November 2011


2G ethanol from the whole sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass
journal, January 2015

  • Pereira, Sandra; Maehara, Larissa; Machado, Cristina
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0224-0

Climate risk management for the U.S. cellulosic biofuels supply chain
journal, January 2014


Bioconversion of Mixed Solids Waste to Ethanol
journal, January 1999

  • Nguyen, Quang A.; Keller, Fred A.; Tucker, Melvin P.
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 78, Issue 1-3
  • DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:78:1-3:455

Strategic supply system design - a holistic evaluation of operational and production cost for a biorefinery supply chain: Strategic biorefinery feedstock supply system design
journal, August 2015

  • Lamers, Patrick; Tan, Eric C. D.; Searcy, Erin M.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1575

Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal
journal, January 2010

  • Erdei, Borbála; Barta, Zsolt; Sipos, Bálint
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-3-16

The Effect of Biomass Densification on Structural Sugar Release and Yield in Biofuel Feedstock and Feedstock Blends
journal, January 2017


Effect of steam explosion on waste copier paper alone and in a mixed lignocellulosic substrate on saccharification and fermentation
journal, July 2015


A GIS-based approach to evaluate biomass potential from energy crops at regional scale
journal, June 2010


Scale-Up of Ionic Liquid-Based Fractionation of Single and Mixed Feedstocks
journal, February 2015


Investigation of thermochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional supply system and distributed pre-processing supply system designs
journal, March 2014

  • Muth, David J.; Langholtz, Matthew H.; Tan, Eric C. D.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1483

Optimizing ethanol production by thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus CCT 7735 in a mixture of sugarcane bagasse and ricotta whey
journal, August 2015

  • Ferreira, Priscila Gonçalves; da Silveira, Fernando Augusto; dos Santos, Raquel Cristina Vieira
  • Food Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 24, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10068-015-0182-0

Continuous fermentation of wheat-supplemented lignocellulose hydrolysate with different types of cell retention
journal, September 2007

  • Brandberg, Tomas; Karimi, Keikhosro; Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 98, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bit.21410