DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Measurement of the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in the Earth's Magnetotail

Abstract

In the Earth's magnetotail, magnetic reconnection releases stored magnetic energy and drives magnetospheric convection. The rate at which magnetic flux is transferred from the reconnection inflow to outflow regions is determined by the reconnection electric field Er, which is often referred to as the unnormalized reconnection rate. To better quantify the efficiency of reconnection, this electric field Er is often normalized by the characteristic Alfvén speed and the reconnecting magnetic field. This parameter is generally called the normalized or dimensionless reconnection rate R. In this paper, we employ a two–dimensional fully kinetic simulation to model a magnetotail reconnection event with weak geomagnetic activity (<200 nT of the AE index) observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission on 11 July 2017. We obtain R and Er from direct measurements in the diffusion region and indirect measurements of the rate at the separatrix using a recently proposed remote sensing technique. The measured normalized rate for this MMS event is R ~0.15–0.2, consistent with theoretical and simulation models of fast collisionless reconnection. This corresponds to an unnormalized rate of Er ~2–3 mV/m. Based on quantitative consistencies between the simulation and the MMS observations, we conclude that our estimates of the reconnection rates aremore » reasonably accurate. Here, given that past studies have found Er of the order ~10 mV/m during strong geomagnetic substorms, these results indicate that the local Er in magnetotail reconnection may be an important parameter controlling the amplitude of geomagnetic disturbances.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [8]; ORCiD logo [9]; ORCiD logo [10]
  1. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz (Austria)
  2. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz (Austria); Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)
  3. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (United States)
  4. Univ. Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi (Malaysia)
  5. JAXA, Sagamihara (Japan)
  6. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  7. Univ. of Bergen, Bergen (Norway); Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX (United States)
  8. Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States); Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX (United States)
  9. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX (United States)
  10. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1483547
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-18-28888
Journal ID: ISSN 2169-9380
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 123; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-9380
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; magnetic reconnection; reconnection rate; MMS; magnetotail; PIC simulation; geomagnetic activity

Citation Formats

Nakamura, Takuma K. M., Genestreti, K. J., Liu, Yi -Hsin, Nakamura, R., Teh, W. -L., Hasegawa, H., Daughton, William Scott, Hesse, M., Torbert, R. B., Burch, J. L., and Giles, B. L. Measurement of the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in the Earth's Magnetotail. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1029/2018JA025713.
Nakamura, Takuma K. M., Genestreti, K. J., Liu, Yi -Hsin, Nakamura, R., Teh, W. -L., Hasegawa, H., Daughton, William Scott, Hesse, M., Torbert, R. B., Burch, J. L., & Giles, B. L. Measurement of the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in the Earth's Magnetotail. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025713
Nakamura, Takuma K. M., Genestreti, K. J., Liu, Yi -Hsin, Nakamura, R., Teh, W. -L., Hasegawa, H., Daughton, William Scott, Hesse, M., Torbert, R. B., Burch, J. L., and Giles, B. L. Sat . "Measurement of the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in the Earth's Magnetotail". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025713. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1483547.
@article{osti_1483547,
title = {Measurement of the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in the Earth's Magnetotail},
author = {Nakamura, Takuma K. M. and Genestreti, K. J. and Liu, Yi -Hsin and Nakamura, R. and Teh, W. -L. and Hasegawa, H. and Daughton, William Scott and Hesse, M. and Torbert, R. B. and Burch, J. L. and Giles, B. L.},
abstractNote = {In the Earth's magnetotail, magnetic reconnection releases stored magnetic energy and drives magnetospheric convection. The rate at which magnetic flux is transferred from the reconnection inflow to outflow regions is determined by the reconnection electric field Er, which is often referred to as the unnormalized reconnection rate. To better quantify the efficiency of reconnection, this electric field Er is often normalized by the characteristic Alfvén speed and the reconnecting magnetic field. This parameter is generally called the normalized or dimensionless reconnection rate R. In this paper, we employ a two–dimensional fully kinetic simulation to model a magnetotail reconnection event with weak geomagnetic activity (<200 nT of the AE index) observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission on 11 July 2017. We obtain R and Er from direct measurements in the diffusion region and indirect measurements of the rate at the separatrix using a recently proposed remote sensing technique. The measured normalized rate for this MMS event is R ~0.15–0.2, consistent with theoretical and simulation models of fast collisionless reconnection. This corresponds to an unnormalized rate of Er ~2–3 mV/m. Based on quantitative consistencies between the simulation and the MMS observations, we conclude that our estimates of the reconnection rates are reasonably accurate. Here, given that past studies have found Er of the order ~10 mV/m during strong geomagnetic substorms, these results indicate that the local Er in magnetotail reconnection may be an important parameter controlling the amplitude of geomagnetic disturbances.},
doi = {10.1029/2018JA025713},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics},
number = 11,
volume = 123,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Sat Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 39 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Magnetotail reconnection rate during magnetospheric substorms
journal, November 1997

  • Blanchard, G. T.; Lyons, L. R.; de la Beaujardière, O.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 102, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JA02163

Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones
journal, January 1961


Drift turbulence, particle transport, and anomalous dissipation at the reconnecting magnetopause
journal, June 2018

  • Le, A.; Daughton, W.; Ohia, O.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5027086

Occurrence frequencies of IMF triggered and nontriggered substorms
journal, January 2003


Enhanced electron mixing and heating in 3‐D asymmetric reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause
journal, March 2017

  • Le, A.; Daughton, W.; Chen, L. ‐J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL072522

Three-dimensional particle simulations of collisionless magnetic reconnection
journal, January 2002


Multi-scale structure of the electron diffusion region: STRUCTURE OF THE ELECTRON DIFFUSION REGION
journal, July 2007

  • Karimabadi, H.; Daughton, W.; Scudder, J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GL030306

Hodographic approach for determining spacecraft trajectories through magnetic reconnection diffusion regions: HODOGRAPHIC TRAJECTORY ALGORITHM
journal, February 2017

  • Shuster, J. R.; Argall, M. R.; Torbert, R. B.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL072570

Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space
journal, May 2016


Kinetic quasi-viscous and bulk flow inertia effects in collisionless magnetotail reconnection
journal, January 1998

  • Kuznetsova, Masha M.; Hesse, Michael; Winske, Dan
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 103, Issue A1
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JA02699

Three-dimensional development of front region of plasma jets generated by magnetic reconnection: THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF RECONNECTION JET FRONT
journal, August 2016

  • Nakamura, T. K. M.; Nakamura, R.; Baumjohann, W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070215

Two-stage bulk electron heating in the diffusion region of anti-parallel symmetric reconnection
journal, October 2016

  • Le, A.; Egedal, J.; Daughton, W.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4964768

Role of electron physics in the development of turbulent magnetic reconnection in collisionless plasmas
journal, April 2011

  • Daughton, W.; Roytershteyn, V.; Karimabadi, H.
  • Nature Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nphys1965

Externally driven magnetic reconnection in the presence of a normal magnetic field
journal, January 2005


On the Collisionless Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Rate
journal, April 2018

  • Liu, Yi-Hsin; Hesse, M.; Cassak, P. A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL076460

Near-Earth plasma sheet boundary dynamics during substorm dipolarization
journal, September 2017


Sweet's mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluids
journal, December 1957


How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E M for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
journal, November 2018

  • Genestreti, K. J.; Nakamura, T. K. M.; Nakamura, R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 123, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JA025711

Structure of the Magnetic Reconnection Diffusion Region from Four-Spacecraft Observations
journal, August 2004


Suppression of collisionless magnetic reconnection in asymmetric current sheets
journal, June 2016

  • Liu, Yi-Hsin; Hesse, Michael
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4954818

Electron dissipation in collisionless magnetic reconnection
journal, November 1998

  • Hesse, Michael; Winske, Dan
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 103, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/98JA01570

Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives
journal, May 2015


Two-Scale Structure of the Electron Dissipation Region during Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
journal, October 2007


Multi-scale structures of turbulent magnetic reconnection
journal, May 2016

  • Nakamura, T. K. M.; Nakamura, R.; Narita, Y.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4951025

Remote Sensing of the Reconnection Electric Field From In Situ Multipoint Observations of the Separatrix Boundary
journal, May 2018

  • Nakamura, T. K. M.; Nakamura, R.; Varsani, A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL078340

Reconnection rates in driven magnetic reconnection
journal, August 2007


Reconstruction of the electron diffusion region observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft: First results: ELECTRON DIFFUSION REGION SEEN BY MMS
journal, May 2017

  • Hasegawa, H.; Sonnerup, B. U. Ö.; Denton, R. E.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073163

Electromagnetic properties of the lower-hybrid drift instability in a thin current sheet
journal, August 2003


The FIELDS Instrument Suite on MMS: Scientific Objectives, Measurements, and Data Products
journal, November 2014


The Reconnection Rate of Magnetic Fields
journal, February 1973

  • Parker, E. N.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 180
  • DOI: 10.1086/151959

The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers
journal, August 2014


A review of the 0.1 reconnection rate problem
journal, September 2017


Plasmoid-Induced Turbulence in Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
journal, December 2012


Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale
journal, March 2016


Why does Steady-State Magnetic Reconnection have a Maximum Local Rate of Order 0.1?
journal, February 2017


Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) Magnetic Reconnection Challenge
journal, March 2001

  • Birn, J.; Drake, J. F.; Shay, M. A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 106, Issue A3
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JA900449

Ultrahigh performance three-dimensional electromagnetic relativistic kinetic plasma simulation
journal, May 2008

  • Bowers, K. J.; Albright, B. J.; Yin, L.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2840133

Antiparallel magnetic reconnection rates at the Earth's magnetopause: ANTIPARALLEL MAGNETIC RECONNECTION
journal, October 2010

  • Fuselier, S. A.; Petrinec, S. M.; Trattner, K. J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 115, Issue A10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JA015302

Growth phase of magnetospheric substorms
journal, October 1970


Fluid and kinetics signatures of reconnection at the dawn tail magnetopause: Wind observations
journal, November 2001

  • Phan, Tai D.; Sonnerup, Bengt U. Ö.; Lin, Robert P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 106, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2001JA900054

New Measure of the Dissipation Region in Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
journal, May 2011


Do dispersive waves play a role in collisionless magnetic reconnection?
journal, February 2014

  • Liu, Yi-Hsin; Daughton, W.; Karimabadi, H.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4865579

Structure of the dissipation region during collisionless magnetic reconnection
journal, May 1998

  • Shay, M. A.; Drake, J. F.; Denton, R. E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 103, Issue A5
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JA03528

Advances in petascale kinetic plasma simulation with VPIC and Roadrunner
journal, July 2009


A review of pressure anisotropy caused by electron trapping in collisionless plasma, and its implications for magnetic reconnection
journal, June 2013

  • Egedal, Jan; Le, Ari; Daughton, William
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 20, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4811092

Spatial dimensions of the electron diffusion region in anti-parallel magnetic reconnection
journal, January 2016


Geospace Environment Modeling magnetic reconnection challenge: Simulations with a full particle electromagnetic code
journal, March 2001

  • Pritchett, P. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 106, Issue A3
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JA001006

The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission
journal, December 2014


The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS
journal, November 2014


Secondary reconnection sites in reconnection-generated flux ropes and reconnection fronts
journal, July 2015

  • Lapenta, Giovanni; Markidis, Stefano; Goldman, Martin V.
  • Nature Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/nphys3406

The structure of the magnetic reconnection exhaust boundary
journal, February 2012

  • Liu, Yi-Hsin; Drake, J. F.; Swisdak, M.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 19, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.3685755

Magnetospheric Multiscale Science Mission Profile and Operations
journal, September 2014


Multiscale Currents Observed by MMS in the Flow Braking Region
journal, February 2018

  • Nakamura, Rumi; Varsani, Ali; Genestreti, Kevin J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 123, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024686

Analyzing the Magnetopause Internal Structure: New Possibilities Offered by MMS Tested in a Case Study: ANALYSE OF THE MAGNETOPAUSE INTERNAL STRUCTURE WITH MMS
journal, January 2018

  • Rezeau, L.; Belmont, G.; Manuzzo, R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 123, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024526

MMS Observation of Asymmetric Reconnection Supported by 3-D Electron Pressure Divergence: OHM'S LAW FOR NEW MMS EDR EVENT
journal, March 2018

  • Genestreti, K. J.; Varsani, A.; Burch, J. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JA025019

14. The neutral point theory of solar flares
journal, January 1958


New Measure of the Dissipation Region in Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
text, January 2011


Works referencing / citing this record:

Magnetic Reconnection in the Space Sciences: Past, Present, and Future
journal, January 2020

  • Hesse, M.; Cassak, P. A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 125, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025935

Electron Vorticity Indicative of the Electron Diffusion Region of Magnetic Reconnection
journal, June 2019

  • Hwang, K. ‐J.; Choi, E.; Dokgo, K.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082710

Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission Observations of Reconnecting Electric Fields in the Magnetotail on Kinetic Scales
journal, September 2019

  • Macek, W. M.; Silveira, M. V. D.; Sibeck, D. G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 17-18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083782

Observation of Nongyrotropic Electron Distribution Across the Electron Diffusion Region in the Magnetotail Reconnection
journal, December 2019

  • Li, Xinmin; Wang, Rongsheng; Lu, Quanming
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl085014

Mechanism of Reconnection on Kinetic Scales Based on Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission Observations
journal, November 2019

  • Macek, W. M.; Silveira, M. V. D.; Sibeck, D. G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 885, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4b5a