Bayesian calibration of groundwater models with input data uncertainty
Abstract
Abstract Effective water resources management typically relies on numerical models to analyze groundwater flow and solute transport processes. Groundwater models are often subject to input data uncertainty, as some inputs (such as recharge and well pumping rates) are estimated and subject to uncertainty. Current practices of groundwater model calibration often overlook uncertainties in input data; this can lead to biased parameter estimates and compromised predictions. Through a synthetic case study of surface‐ground water interaction under changing pumping conditions and land use, we investigate the impacts of uncertain pumping and recharge rates on model calibration and uncertainty analysis. We then present a Bayesian framework of model calibration to handle uncertain input of groundwater models. The framework implements a marginalizing step to account for input data uncertainty when evaluating likelihood. It was found that not accounting for input uncertainty may lead to biased, overconfident parameter estimates because parameters could be over‐adjusted to compensate for possible input data errors. Parameter compensation can have deleterious impacts when the calibrated model is used to make forecast under a scenario that is different from calibration conditions. By marginalizing input data uncertainty, the Bayesian calibration approach effectively alleviates parameter compensation and gives more accurate predictions in themore »
- Authors:
-
- Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (United States); Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
- Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (United States)
- Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1466031
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1402401
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0002687; DE‐SC0002687
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Water Resources Research
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 53; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1397
- Publisher:
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; input uncertainty; calibration; Bayesian; uncertainty quanitfication
Citation Formats
Xu, Tianfang, Valocchi, Albert J., Ye, Ming, Liang, Feng, and Lin, Yu -Feng. Bayesian calibration of groundwater models with input data uncertainty. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1002/2016WR019512.
Xu, Tianfang, Valocchi, Albert J., Ye, Ming, Liang, Feng, & Lin, Yu -Feng. Bayesian calibration of groundwater models with input data uncertainty. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019512
Xu, Tianfang, Valocchi, Albert J., Ye, Ming, Liang, Feng, and Lin, Yu -Feng. Wed .
"Bayesian calibration of groundwater models with input data uncertainty". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019512. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1466031.
@article{osti_1466031,
title = {Bayesian calibration of groundwater models with input data uncertainty},
author = {Xu, Tianfang and Valocchi, Albert J. and Ye, Ming and Liang, Feng and Lin, Yu -Feng},
abstractNote = {Abstract Effective water resources management typically relies on numerical models to analyze groundwater flow and solute transport processes. Groundwater models are often subject to input data uncertainty, as some inputs (such as recharge and well pumping rates) are estimated and subject to uncertainty. Current practices of groundwater model calibration often overlook uncertainties in input data; this can lead to biased parameter estimates and compromised predictions. Through a synthetic case study of surface‐ground water interaction under changing pumping conditions and land use, we investigate the impacts of uncertain pumping and recharge rates on model calibration and uncertainty analysis. We then present a Bayesian framework of model calibration to handle uncertain input of groundwater models. The framework implements a marginalizing step to account for input data uncertainty when evaluating likelihood. It was found that not accounting for input uncertainty may lead to biased, overconfident parameter estimates because parameters could be over‐adjusted to compensate for possible input data errors. Parameter compensation can have deleterious impacts when the calibrated model is used to make forecast under a scenario that is different from calibration conditions. By marginalizing input data uncertainty, the Bayesian calibration approach effectively alleviates parameter compensation and gives more accurate predictions in the synthetic case study. The marginalizing Bayesian method also decomposes prediction uncertainty into uncertainties contributed by parameters, input data, and measurements. The results underscore the need to account for input uncertainty to better inform postmodeling decision making.},
doi = {10.1002/2016WR019512},
journal = {Water Resources Research},
number = 4,
volume = 53,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Wed Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Describing the catchment-averaged precipitation as a stochastic process improves parameter and input estimation: IMPROVING INPUT UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
journal, April 2016
- Del Giudice, Dario; Albert, Carlo; Rieckermann, Jörg
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 52, Issue 4
The global groundwater crisis
journal, October 2014
- Famiglietti, J. S.
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 11
How do hydrologic modeling decisions affect the portrayal of climate change impacts?: Subjective Hydrologic Modelling Decisions in Climate Change Impacts
journal, October 2015
- Mendoza, Pablo A.; Clark, Martyn P.; Mizukami, Naoki
- Hydrological Processes, Vol. 30, Issue 7
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences
journal, November 1992
- Gelman, Andrew; Rubin, Donald B.
- Statistical Science, Vol. 7, Issue 4
Changes in precipitation with climate change
journal, March 2011
- Trenberth, Ke
- Climate Research, Vol. 47, Issue 1
Obtaining parsimonious hydraulic conductivity fields using head and transport observations: A Bayesian geostatistical parameter estimation approach: COUPLED FLOW AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION
journal, August 2009
- Fienen, M.; Hunt, R.; Krabbenhoft, D.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, Issue 8
Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation: FORCING DATA ERROR USING MCMC SAMPLING
journal, December 2008
- Vrugt, Jasper A.; ter Braak, Cajo J. F.; Clark, Martyn P.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 44, Issue 12
Impacts of rainfall spatial variability on hydrogeological response
journal, February 2015
- Sapriza-Azuri, Gonzalo; Jódar, Jorge; Navarro, Vicente
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 2
Variance-based global sensitivity analysis for multiple scenarios and models with implementation using sparse grid collocation
journal, September 2015
- Dai, Heng; Ye, Ming
- Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 528
Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems
journal, April 2009
- Marzouk, Youssef M.; Najm, Habib N.
- Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 228, Issue 6
Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling
journal, January 2009
- Vrugt, J. A.; ter Braak, C. J. F.; Diks, C. G. H.
- International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 10, Issue 3
A Bayesian approach to improved calibration and prediction of groundwater models with structural error
journal, November 2015
- Xu, Tianfang; Valocchi, Albert J.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 11
Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application: INPUT UNCERTAINTY IN HYDROLOGY, 2
journal, March 2006
- Kavetski, Dmitri; Kuczera, George; Franks, Stewart W.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, Issue 3
Practical Use of Computationally Frugal Model Analysis Methods: M.C. Hill et al. Ground Water xx, no. x: xx-xx
journal, March 2015
- Hill, Mary C.; Kavetski, Dmitri; Clark, Martyn
- Groundwater, Vol. 54, Issue 2
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Diagnostics: A Comparative Review
journal, June 1996
- Cowles, Mary Kathryn; Carlin, Bradley P.
- Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, Issue 434
PRO-GRADE: GIS Toolkits for Ground Water Recharge and Discharge Estimation
journal, January 2009
- Lin, Yu-Feng; Wang, Jihua; Valocchi, Albert J.
- Ground Water, Vol. 47, Issue 1
Effective Groundwater Model Calibration
book, January 2007
- Hill, Mary C.; Tiedeman, Claire R.
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Quantifying the predictive consequences of model error with linear subspace analysis: SUBSPACE ANALYSIS OF MODEL ERROR
journal, February 2014
- White, Jeremy T.; Doherty, John E.; Hughes, Joseph D.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 2
A truncated Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for the calibration of highly parameterized nonlinear models
journal, June 2011
- Finsterle, Stefan; Kowalsky, Michael B.
- Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 37, Issue 6
Calibration-constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques: CALIBRATION-CONSTRAINED SSMC ANALYSIS
journal, January 2009
- Tonkin, Matthew; Doherty, John
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, Issue 12
Improving uncertainty estimation in urban hydrological modeling by statistically describing bias
journal, January 2013
- Del Giudice, D.; Honti, M.; Scheidegger, A.
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17, Issue 10
Analysis of regression confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals for uncertainty quantification: REGRESSION CONFIDENCE AND BAYESIAN CREDIBLE INTERVALS
journal, September 2012
- Lu, Dan; Ye, Ming; Hill, Mary C.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 9
Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming
journal, November 2006
- Held, Isaac M.; Soden, Brian J.
- Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 21
Calibration of hydrological model GR2M using Bayesian uncertainty analysis: BAYESIAN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
journal, February 2008
- Huard, David; Mailhot, Alain
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 44, Issue 2
An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction: AN INTEGRATED BAYESIAN MULTIMODEL FRAMEWORK
journal, January 2007
- Ajami, Newsha K.; Duan, Qingyun; Sorooshian, Soroosh
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 43, Issue 1
Efficient posterior exploration of a high-dimensional groundwater model from two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion: Speeding up MCMC Simulation of a Groundwater Model
journal, May 2013
- Laloy, Eric; Rogiers, Bart; Vrugt, Jasper A.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 5
Assessing the relative importance of parameter and forcing uncertainty and their interactions in conceptual hydrological model simulations
journal, November 2016
- Mockler, E. M.; Chun, K. P.; Sapriza-Azuri, G.
- Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 97
Reply to Comment by B. Renard et al. on “An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction”: COMMENTARY
journal, March 2009
- Ajami, Newsha K.; Duan, Qingyun; Sorooshian, Soroosh
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, Issue 3
Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge
journal, January 2002
- Scanlon, Bridget R.; Healy, Richard W.; Cook, Peter G.
- Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 10, Issue 1
High-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple-try DREAM (ZS) and high-performance computing : EFFICIENT MCMC FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS
journal, January 2012
- Laloy, Eric; Vrugt, Jasper A.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 1
Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections: UNCERTAINTY SOURCES IN CLIMATE-IMPACT PROJECTIONS
journal, March 2013
- Bosshard, T.; Carambia, M.; Goergen, K.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 3
Global change and the groundwater management challenge: Groundwater Management Challenge
journal, May 2015
- Gorelick, Steven M.; Zheng, Chunmiao
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 5
Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: Characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation: DECOMPOSING PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY IN HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
journal, November 2011
- Renard, Benjamin; Kavetski, Dmitri; Leblois, Etienne
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, Issue 11
Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors: IDENTIFIABILITY OF INPUT AND STRUCTURAL ERRORS
journal, May 2010
- Renard, Benjamin; Kavetski, Dmitri; Kuczera, George
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 46, Issue 5
A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling: SURROGATES OF GROUNDWATER MODELS
journal, August 2015
- Asher, M. J.; Croke, B. F. W.; Jakeman, A. J.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 8
Parameter Estimation for Groundwater Models under Uncertain Irrigation Data
journal, July 2014
- Demissie, Yonas; Valocchi, Albert; Cai, Ximing
- Groundwater, Vol. 53, Issue 4
Rainfall uncertainty in hydrological modelling: An evaluation of multiplicative error models
journal, March 2011
- McMillan, Hilary; Jackson, Bethanna; Clark, Martyn
- Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 400, Issue 1-2
An approach for improving the sampling efficiency in the Bayesian calibration of computationally expensive simulation models: IMPROVING SAMPLING EFFICIENCY IN BAYESIAN CALIBRATION
journal, June 2009
- Xie, Hua; Eheart, J. Wayland; Chen, Yuguo
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, Issue 6
Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index
journal, February 2010
- Saltelli, Andrea; Annoni, Paola; Azzini, Ivano
- Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 181, Issue 2
Towards a Practice Based View of Strategy
journal, January 2014
- Bromiley, Philip; Rau, Devaki
- Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2014, Issue 1
Comment on “An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction” by Newsha K. Ajami et al.: COMMENTARY
journal, March 2009
- Renard, Benjamin; Kavetski, Dmitri; Kuczera, George
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, Issue 3
Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework: HYDROLOGIC DATA ASSIMILATION
journal, July 2007
- Liu, Yuqiong; Gupta, Hoshin V.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 43, Issue 7
Ground Water Model Calibration Using Pilot Points and Regularization
journal, March 2003
- Doherty, John
- Ground Water, Vol. 41, Issue 2
Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory: INPUT UNCERTAINTY IN HYDROLOGY, 1
journal, March 2006
- Kavetski, Dmitri; Kuczera, George; Franks, Stewart W.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, Issue 3
A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models: HYBRID REGULARIZATION METHODOLOGY
journal, October 2005
- Tonkin, Matthew James; Doherty, John
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, Issue 10
Effects of error covariance structure on estimation of model averaging weights and predictive performance: EFFECTS OF ERROR COVARIANCE STRUCTURE ON MODEL AVERAGING
journal, September 2013
- Lu, Dan; Ye, Ming; Meyer, Philip D.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 9
Ground-Water Flow Model for the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho
report, January 2007
- Hsieh, Paul A.; Barber, Michael E.; Contor, Bryce A.
- USGS
A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000
report, January 2004
- Prudic, David E.; Konikow, Leonard F.; Banta, Edward R.
- USGS
Works referencing / citing this record:
Toward a combined Bayesian frameworks to quantify parameter uncertainty in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability
journal, December 2018
- Hassanzadeh, Yousef; Afshar, Amirhosein Aghakhani; Pourreza-Bilondi, Mohsen
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 191, Issue 1
Estimation and Impact Assessment of Input and Parameter Uncertainty in Predicting Groundwater Flow With a Fully Distributed Model
journal, September 2018
- Mustafa, Syed Md. Touhidul; Nossent, Jiri; Ghysels, Gert
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 54, Issue 9
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Uncertainty Analysis of a Continuous Hydrological Model Using DREAM-ZS Algorithm
journal, June 2019
- Aghakhani Afshar, Amirhosein; Hassanzadeh, Yousef; Pourreza-Bilondi, Mohsen
- Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, Vol. 44, Issue 4
Addressing Challenges for Mapping Irrigated Fields in Subhumid Temperate Regions by Integrating Remote Sensing and Hydroclimatic Data
journal, February 2019
- Xu, Tianfang; Deines, Jillian; Kendall, Anthony
- Remote Sensing, Vol. 11, Issue 3