DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparative productivity of six bioenergy cropping systems on marginal lands in the Great Lakes Region, United States

Abstract

Abstract Growing lignocellulosic crops on marginal lands is a promising solution for sustainable biofuel production. We evaluated the productivity of bioenergy cropping systems (switchgrass [ Panicum virgatum L., var. Cave‐In‐Rock], miscanthus [ Miscanthus × giganteus , ‘Illinois clone’], hybrid poplar [ Populus nigra × P. maximowiczii A. Henry ‘NM6’], native grasses [five species], early successional vegetation, and restored prairie vs. historical vegetation [as reference control]) with and without nitrogen fertilization on low‐fertility former cropland at five sites in the Great Lakes Region, United States. We reported biomass yields for the first 7 years after establishment. Switchgrass was most consistently productive across all sites but miscanthus was more productive at three of the five sites. When averaged across sites, years, and nitrogen (N) treatments, biomass yields followed the order miscanthus > switchgrass > hybrid poplar ≈ native grasses > restored prairie > early successional vegetation ≈ historical vegetation, but varied substantially by crop and site, with a significant crop by site interaction. Yields of miscanthus and switchgrass peaked after four–five growing seasons and declined thereafter, while yields of both native grasses and restored prairie increased throughout 6 years with no sign of follow‐on decline, suggesting that polycultures may outperform monocultures over the long term. Yields of early successional vegetation—similarmore » in composition to historical vegetation at each site—did not improve with time. Nitrogen fertilization increased the yields of all cropping systems at all sites. Our results demonstrate the viability of low‐productivity former cropland for long‐term bioenergy production and suggest there is no single crop best suited for all low fertility soils.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Department of Energy‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA, Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
  2. Department of Energy‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA, Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Michigan State University Hickory Corners Michigan USA
  3. Department of Energy‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA, Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1991132
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1991133
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Agronomy Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Agronomy Journal Journal Volume: 115 Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 0002-1962
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Jayawardena, Dileepa M., Robertson, G. Philip, Sanford, Gregg R., and Thelen, Kurt D. Comparative productivity of six bioenergy cropping systems on marginal lands in the Great Lakes Region, United States. United States: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1002/agj2.21416.
Jayawardena, Dileepa M., Robertson, G. Philip, Sanford, Gregg R., & Thelen, Kurt D. Comparative productivity of six bioenergy cropping systems on marginal lands in the Great Lakes Region, United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21416
Jayawardena, Dileepa M., Robertson, G. Philip, Sanford, Gregg R., and Thelen, Kurt D. Tue . "Comparative productivity of six bioenergy cropping systems on marginal lands in the Great Lakes Region, United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21416.
@article{osti_1991132,
title = {Comparative productivity of six bioenergy cropping systems on marginal lands in the Great Lakes Region, United States},
author = {Jayawardena, Dileepa M. and Robertson, G. Philip and Sanford, Gregg R. and Thelen, Kurt D.},
abstractNote = {Abstract Growing lignocellulosic crops on marginal lands is a promising solution for sustainable biofuel production. We evaluated the productivity of bioenergy cropping systems (switchgrass [ Panicum virgatum L., var. Cave‐In‐Rock], miscanthus [ Miscanthus × giganteus , ‘Illinois clone’], hybrid poplar [ Populus nigra × P. maximowiczii A. Henry ‘NM6’], native grasses [five species], early successional vegetation, and restored prairie vs. historical vegetation [as reference control]) with and without nitrogen fertilization on low‐fertility former cropland at five sites in the Great Lakes Region, United States. We reported biomass yields for the first 7 years after establishment. Switchgrass was most consistently productive across all sites but miscanthus was more productive at three of the five sites. When averaged across sites, years, and nitrogen (N) treatments, biomass yields followed the order miscanthus > switchgrass > hybrid poplar ≈ native grasses > restored prairie > early successional vegetation ≈ historical vegetation, but varied substantially by crop and site, with a significant crop by site interaction. Yields of miscanthus and switchgrass peaked after four–five growing seasons and declined thereafter, while yields of both native grasses and restored prairie increased throughout 6 years with no sign of follow‐on decline, suggesting that polycultures may outperform monocultures over the long term. Yields of early successional vegetation—similar in composition to historical vegetation at each site—did not improve with time. Nitrogen fertilization increased the yields of all cropping systems at all sites. Our results demonstrate the viability of low‐productivity former cropland for long‐term bioenergy production and suggest there is no single crop best suited for all low fertility soils.},
doi = {10.1002/agj2.21416},
journal = {Agronomy Journal},
number = 5,
volume = 115,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 18 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Tue Jul 18 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21416

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Marginal Lands: Concept, Assessment and Management
journal, April 2013

  • Kang, Shujiang; Post, Wilfred M.; Nichols, Jeff A.
  • Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5539/jas.v5n5p129

Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels
journal, August 2010

  • Somerville, Cris; Youngs, Heather; Taylor, Caroline
  • Science, Vol. 329, Issue 5993, p. 790-792
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.1189268

Turnover of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Fertilizer in Old Grassland
journal, May 2004

  • Jenkinson, D. S.; Poulton, P. R.; Johnston, A. E.
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 68, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.8650

Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production
journal, August 2011

  • Gelfand, I.; Zenone, T.; Jasrotia, P.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017277108

Restoring Soil Fertility on Degraded Lands to Meet Food, Fuel, and Climate Security Needs via Perennialization
journal, October 2021

  • Mosier, Samantha; Córdova, S. Carolina; Robertson, G. Philip
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Vol. 5
  • DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.706142

Switchgrass nitrogen response and estimated production costs on diverse sites
journal, April 2017

  • Fike, John H.; Pease, James W.; Owens, Vance N.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12444

Soil nutrient removal by four potential bioenergy crops: Zea mays, Panicum virgatum, Miscanthus×giganteus, and prairie
journal, January 2016

  • Masters, Michael D.; Black, Christopher K.; Kantola, Ilsa B.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 216
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.016

Comparative productivity of alternative cellulosic bioenergy cropping systems in the North Central USA
journal, January 2016

  • Sanford, Gregg R.; Oates, Lawrence G.; Jasrotia, Poonam
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 216
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.018

Biomass Feedstock Harvest from Conservation Reserve Program Land in Northwestern Oklahoma
journal, February 2010


Switchgrass cropping systems affect soil carbon and nitrogen and microbial diversity and activity on marginal lands
journal, May 2022

  • Li, Xiufen; Petipas, Renee H.; Antoch, Amanda A.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 14, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12949

Senescence and nitrogen use efficiency in perennial grasses for forage and biofuel production
journal, August 2017

  • Yang, Jiading; Udvardi, Michael
  • Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 69, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx241

Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands
journal, January 2017

  • Mehmood, Muhammad Aamer; Ibrahim, Muhammad; Rashid, Umer
  • Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.003

Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
journal, January 2013

  • Gelfand, Ilya; Sahajpal, Ritvik; Zhang, Xuesong
  • Nature, Vol. 493, Issue 7433
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11811

Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass
journal, January 2021


Nitrogen Release from Environmentally Smart Nitrogen Fertilizer as Influenced by Soil Series, Temperature, Moisture, and Incubation Method
journal, August 2011

  • Golden, Bobby; Slaton, Nathan; Norman, Richard
  • Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 42, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2011.587568

Mitigating the potential for invasive spread of the exotic biofuel crop, Miscanthus × giganteus
journal, August 2015


ECOLOGY: Adding Biofuels to the Invasive Species Fire?
journal, September 2006


Biomass Production a Stronger Driver of Cellulosic Ethanol Yield than Biomass Quality
journal, January 2017


AGRICULTURE: Sustainable Biofuels Redux
journal, October 2008


Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
journal, June 2017

  • Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L.
  • Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324

Isotopic evidence for episodic nitrogen fixation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)
journal, February 2019


Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
journal, February 2008


A Comparison of Perennial Polycultures and Monocultures for Producing Biomass for Biorefinery Feedstock
journal, January 2011

  • Griffith, Andrew P.; Epplin, Francis M.; Fuhlendorf, Samuel D.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 103, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0336

First Report of Field Populations of Two Potential Aphid Pests of the Bioenergy Crop Miscanthus × Giganteus
journal, March 2010

  • Bradshaw, Jeffrey D.; Prasifka, Jarrad R.; Steffey, Kevin L.
  • Florida Entomologist, Vol. 93, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1653/024.093.0123

Impacts of nitrogen addition on switchgrass root-associated diazotrophic community structure and function
journal, October 2020

  • Smercina, Darian N.; Evans, Sarah E.; Friesen, Maren L.
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 96, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa208

Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
journal, December 2006


Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
journal, January 2014

  • Werling, B. P.; Dickson, T. L.; Isaacs, R.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309492111

The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels
journal, September 2005