Title: Techno-economic performances and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of various ammonia production pathways including conventional, carbon-capturing, nuclear-powered, and renewable production

Abstract

Ammonia (NH₃) is conventionally produced using fossil natural gas (NG) for hydrogen production through steam reformation and synthesis in the Haber–Bosch (HB) process. The global conventional ammonia production contributes more than 420 million tons of CO₂ emissions annually. Here, in this work, we investigated the techno-economics and well-to-plant-gate (WTG) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of conventional NG-based, carbon-capturing, nuclear-powered, and renewable ammonia production by developing an engineering process model for each. Carbon-capturing ammonia production refers to the NG-based ammonia production while capturing CO₂ and transporting it via pipelines for storage or utilization. Nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production represents an alternative ammonia production through water electrolysis, air separation, and the HB process using carbon-free energy sources. Nuclear and renewable energy sources are assumed to be used for nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production, respectively. Sensitivity analyses are performed for CO₂ pipeline transport distances, potential carbon capture tax credits, and clean H₂ production cost. Carbon-capturing ammonia production reduces WTG GHG emissions by 55–70% compared to conventional NG-based ammonia production methods. Nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production almost eliminate GHG emissions since energy supply is either zero carbon or near-zero carbon. However, when $4.16–4.83 per kg is the cost assumed for clean H₂ production using state-of-the-artmore » electrolysis technologies, the levelized costs of nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia are calculated to be $0.92–1.06 per kg NH₃, which are approximately four times higher than the conventional NG-based ammonia production cost. The cost of CO₂ emission avoidance is estimated in the range of $266–318 per metric ton of CO₂ for nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production. The clean H₂ production cost is the major contributor to the levelized costs of nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production. A lower production cost, near $1 per kg H₂, for clean H₂ is required for nuclear-powered and renewable ammonia production to be cost-competitive with conventional NG-based ammonia production.« less

Authors:

Lee, Kyuha  ^[1];

• Search DOE PAGES for author "Lee, Kyuha"
• Search DOE PAGES for ORCID "0000-0003-1570-9840"

Liu, Xinyu  ^[1];

• Search DOE PAGES for author "Liu, Xinyu"
• Search DOE PAGES for ORCID "0000-0003-4683-0272"

Vyawahare, Pradeep  ^[1];

• Search DOE PAGES for author "Vyawahare, Pradeep"
• Search DOE PAGES for ORCID "0000-0001-5765-7343"

Sun, Pingping  ^[1];

• Search DOE PAGES for author "Sun, Pingping"
• Search DOE PAGES for ORCID "0000-0001-8226-9270"

Elgowainy, Amgad  ^[1];

• Search DOE PAGES for author "Elgowainy, Amgad"
• Search DOE PAGES for ORCID "0000-0003-3713-4654"

Wang, Michael ^[1]

---

+ Show Author Affiliations

1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Energy System Division

Publication Date:

Fri May 13 00:00:00 EDT 2022

Research Org.:

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:

USDOE Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)

OSTI Identifier:

1960296

Alternate Identifier(s):

OSTI ID: 1870731

Grant/Contract Number:  

AC02-06CH11357

Resource Type:

Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:

Green Chemistry

Additional Journal Information:

Journal Volume: 24; Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 1463-9262

Publisher:

Royal Society of Chemistry

Country of Publication:

United States

Language:

English

Subject:

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; ammonia production; life cycle analysis; renewable hydrogen; techno-economic analysis; carbon capture