DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management

Abstract

Abstract Avoiding over-pressurization in subsurface reservoirs is critical for applications like CO $$$$_2$$$$ 2 sequestration and wastewater injection. Managing the pressures by controlling injection/extraction are challenging because of complex heterogeneity in the subsurface. The heterogeneity typically requires high-fidelity physics-based models to make predictions on CO $$$$_2$$$$ 2 fate. Furthermore, characterizing the heterogeneity accurately is fraught with parametric uncertainty. Accounting for both, heterogeneity and uncertainty, makes this a computationally-intensive problem challenging for current reservoir simulators. To tackle this, we use differentiable programming with a full-physics model and machine learning to determine the fluid extraction rates that prevent over-pressurization at critical reservoir locations. We use DPFEHM framework, which has trustworthy physics based on the standard two-point flux finite volume discretization and is also automatically differentiable like machine learning models. Our physics-informed machine learning framework uses convolutional neural networks to learn an appropriate extraction rate based on the permeability field. We also perform a hyperparameter search to improve the model’s accuracy. Training and testing scenarios are executed to evaluate the feasibility of using physics-informed machine learning to manage reservoir pressures. We constructed and tested a sufficiently accurate simulator that is 400 000 times faster than the underlying physics-based simulator, allowing for near real-time analysis and robust uncertainty quantification.

Authors:
; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program; USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1897291
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1909554
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-22-24347
Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322; 18734; PII: 22832
Grant/Contract Number:  
20200575ECR; 89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Scientific Reports
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Scientific Reports Journal Volume: 12 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; carbon capture and storage; computational science; hydrology

Citation Formats

Pachalieva, Aleksandra, O’Malley, Daniel, Harp, Dylan Robert, and Viswanathan, Hari. Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management. United Kingdom: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22832-7.
Pachalieva, Aleksandra, O’Malley, Daniel, Harp, Dylan Robert, & Viswanathan, Hari. Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22832-7
Pachalieva, Aleksandra, O’Malley, Daniel, Harp, Dylan Robert, and Viswanathan, Hari. Fri . "Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22832-7.
@article{osti_1897291,
title = {Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management},
author = {Pachalieva, Aleksandra and O’Malley, Daniel and Harp, Dylan Robert and Viswanathan, Hari},
abstractNote = {Abstract Avoiding over-pressurization in subsurface reservoirs is critical for applications like CO $$_2$$ 2 sequestration and wastewater injection. Managing the pressures by controlling injection/extraction are challenging because of complex heterogeneity in the subsurface. The heterogeneity typically requires high-fidelity physics-based models to make predictions on CO $$_2$$ 2 fate. Furthermore, characterizing the heterogeneity accurately is fraught with parametric uncertainty. Accounting for both, heterogeneity and uncertainty, makes this a computationally-intensive problem challenging for current reservoir simulators. To tackle this, we use differentiable programming with a full-physics model and machine learning to determine the fluid extraction rates that prevent over-pressurization at critical reservoir locations. We use DPFEHM framework, which has trustworthy physics based on the standard two-point flux finite volume discretization and is also automatically differentiable like machine learning models. Our physics-informed machine learning framework uses convolutional neural networks to learn an appropriate extraction rate based on the permeability field. We also perform a hyperparameter search to improve the model’s accuracy. Training and testing scenarios are executed to evaluate the feasibility of using physics-informed machine learning to manage reservoir pressures. We constructed and tested a sufficiently accurate simulator that is 400 000 times faster than the underlying physics-based simulator, allowing for near real-time analysis and robust uncertainty quantification.},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-22832-7},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
number = 1,
volume = 12,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Nov 04 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Fri Nov 04 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage
journal, January 1935


Decision support analysis for safety control in complex project environments based on Bayesian Networks
journal, September 2013


From Fluid Flow to Coupled Processes in Fractured Rock: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
journal, February 2022

  • Viswanathan, H. S.; Ajo‐Franklin, J.; Birkholzer, J. T.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 60, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2021RG000744

Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
journal, November 1978


Machine learning based co-optimization of carbon dioxide sequestration and oil recovery in CO2-EOR project
journal, July 2020


Workflow using sparse vintage data for building a first geological and reservoir model for CO2 geological storage in deep saline aquifer. A case study in the St. Lawrence Platform, Canada
journal, June 2012

  • Claprood, Maxime; Gloaguen, Erwan; Giroux, Bernard
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1292

Earthquakes in Switzerland and surrounding regions during 2006
journal, December 2007

  • Baer, Manfred; Deichmann, Nicolas; Braunmiller, Jochen
  • Swiss Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 100, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00015-007-1242-0

Microseismic imaging of a geothermal reservoir stimulation
journal, July 2008

  • Dyer, B. C.; Schanz, U.; Ladner, F.
  • The Leading Edge, Vol. 27, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.2954024

Development of robust pressure management strategies for geologic CO2 sequestration
journal, September 2017

  • Harp, Dylan R.; Stauffer, Philip H.; O’Malley, Daniel
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 64
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.06.012

An intelligent decision support system for management of petroleum-contaminated sites
journal, April 2001


Machine learning and shallow groundwater chemistry to identify geothermal prospects in the Great Basin, USA
journal, September 2022


Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations
journal, February 2019


Predicting solubility of CO2 in brine by advanced machine learning systems: Application to carbon capture and sequestration
journal, October 2019

  • Menad, Nait Amar; Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein; Varamesh, Amir
  • Journal of CO2 Utilization, Vol. 33
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.009

A new machine learning ensemble model for class imbalance problem of screening enhanced oil recovery methods
journal, March 2021

  • Pirizadeh, Mohsen; Alemohammad, Nafiseh; Manthouri, Mohammad
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 198
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108214

Adversarial uncertainty quantification in physics-informed neural networks
journal, October 2019


A physics-constrained deep learning model for simulating multiphase flow in 3D heterogeneous porous media
journal, April 2022


Machine learning to discover mineral trapping signatures due to CO2 injection
journal, July 2021

  • Ahmmed, Bulbul; Karra, Satish; Vesselinov, Velimir V.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 109
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103382

Normal or abnormal? Machine learning for the leakage detection in carbon sequestration projects using pressure field data
journal, December 2020

  • Sinha, Saurabh; de Lima, Rafael Pires; Lin, Youzuo
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 103
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103189

Maximizing the Value of Pressure Monitoring Data from CO2 Sequestration Projects
journal, January 2013


Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
journal, December 1989


GaS_GeoT: A computer program for an effective use of newly improved gas geothermometers in predicting reliable geothermal reservoir temperatures
journal, January 2021


Data‐Driven Design of Wave‐Propagation Models for Shale‐Oil Reservoirs Based on Machine Learning
journal, December 2021

  • Xiong, Fansheng; Ba, Jing; Gei, Davide
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 126, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2021JB022665

A gradient-based deep neural network model for simulating multiphase flow in porous media
journal, August 2022


A geomechanical approach to casing collapse prediction in oil and gas wells aided by machine learning
journal, January 2021

  • Mohamadian, Nima; Ghorbani, Hamzeh; Wood, David A.
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 196
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107811

Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing
journal, January 2017

  • Bezanson, Jeff; Edelman, Alan; Karpinski, Stefan
  • SIAM Review, Vol. 59, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1137/141000671

A machine learning framework for rapid forecasting and history matching in unconventional reservoirs
journal, November 2021

  • Srinivasan, Shriram; O’Malley, Daniel; Mudunuru, Maruti K.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01023-w

Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry
journal, December 2021


Earthquakes Induced by the Stimulation of an Enhanced Geothermal System below Basel (Switzerland)
journal, September 2009


Machine learning and multi-agent systems in oil and gas industry applications: A survey
journal, November 2019


Application of machine learning techniques for selecting the most suitable enhanced oil recovery method; challenges and opportunities
journal, October 2021

  • Cheraghi, Yasaman; Kord, Shahin; Mashayekhizadeh, Vahid
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 205
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108761

Machine learning reveals cyclic changes in seismic source spectra in Geysers geothermal field
journal, May 2018

  • Holtzman, Benjamin K.; Paté, Arthur; Paisley, John
  • Science Advances, Vol. 4, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao2929

Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems
journal, June 2007


Predicting the Geothermal Heat Flux in Greenland: A Machine Learning Approach
journal, December 2017

  • Rezvanbehbahani, Soroush; Stearns, Leigh A.; Kadivar, Amir
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075661

Machine learning in oil and gas; a SWOT analysis approach
journal, May 2019


High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity
journal, June 2015


Prediction of Reservoir Temperatures Using Hydrogeochemical Data, Western Anatolia Geothermal Systems (Turkey): A Machine Learning Approach
journal, November 2019


Knowledge-based machine learning techniques for accurate prediction of CO2 storage performance in underground saline aquifers
journal, May 2022


Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones
journal, September 2019


Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration
journal, November 2015

  • Cihan, Abdullah; Birkholzer, Jens T.; Bianchi, Marco
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 42
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025

Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection
journal, July 2014


Flux: Elegant machine learning with Julia
journal, May 2018


Inferring CO2 saturation from synthetic surface seismic and downhole monitoring data using machine learning for leakage detection at CO2 sequestration sites
journal, September 2020

  • Wang, Zan; Dilmore, Robert M.; Harbert, William
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 100
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103115

PPINN: Parareal physics-informed neural network for time-dependent PDEs
journal, October 2020

  • Meng, Xuhui; Li, Zhen; Zhang, Dongkun
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 370
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113250

Prediction of CO2 diffusivity in brine using white-box machine learning
journal, July 2020


Earthquakes in Switzerland and surrounding regions during 2007
journal, December 2008

  • Deichmann, Nicolas; Baer, Manfred; Clinton, John
  • Swiss Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 101, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00015-008-1304-y

Geologic CO2 sequestration monitoring design: A machine learning and uncertainty quantification based approach
journal, September 2018


On the feasibility of using physics-informed machine learning for underground reservoir pressure management
journal, September 2021


Use of machine learning and data analytics to increase drilling efficiency for nearby wells
journal, April 2017