DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: How to design a zero-emissions vehicle mandate? Simulating impacts on sales, GHG emissions and cost-effectiveness using the AUtomaker-Consumer Model (AUM)

Abstract

We report although numerous studies investigate the impacts of policy on zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) sales, few address the impacts of a ZEV sales mandate and its particular design features. We use the AUtomaker-consumer Model (AUM) to simulate varying designs of a ZEV mandate in Canada's light-duty vehicle sector, requiring 30% ZEV sales by 2030. Design features include: different penalties for non-compliance, different allocations of credits per ZEV type, and the allowance of banking credits across years. For each policy design, we consider impacts on ZEV adoption, GHG emissions, consumer surplus, automaker profits, and overall policy cost-effectiveness. Results demonstrate trade-offs among the policy designs. Generally, ZEV mandate designs that are more effective at increasing ZEV adoption and decreasing GHG emissions also induce larger reductions in consumer surplus and automaker profits. To achieve the ZEV sales goal, simulations show that a higher non-compliance penalty (CDN$ 10k per credit) is needed. ZEV adoption and GHG reductions are also improved by a “One credit per ZEV” scheme, rather than a “California-style” scheme that gives multiple credits per battery-electric vehicle. Further, allowing automakers to bank credits softens the policy impact on profit and increases automaker compliance in initial years. Across these different design combinations, wemore » find that the most cost-effective design ($CDN/tonne mitigated, including consumer surplus and automaker profits impacts) utilizes a $10k non-compliance penalty and “One credit per ZEV” system that allows banking. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of various ZEV mandate design features, and the complex trade-offs involved among various policy goals.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC (Canada)
  2. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; Simon Fraser University's Community Trust Endowment Fund; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS); Navius Research and Mitacs
OSTI Identifier:
1887671
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Transport Policy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 117; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0967-070X
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; climate policy; zero-emission vehicle; ZEV; ZEV mandate; automaker model; technology adoption model; ZEV credit

Citation Formats

Bhardwaj, Chandan, Axsen, Jonn, and McCollum, David. How to design a zero-emissions vehicle mandate? Simulating impacts on sales, GHG emissions and cost-effectiveness using the AUtomaker-Consumer Model (AUM). United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.012.
Bhardwaj, Chandan, Axsen, Jonn, & McCollum, David. How to design a zero-emissions vehicle mandate? Simulating impacts on sales, GHG emissions and cost-effectiveness using the AUtomaker-Consumer Model (AUM). United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.012
Bhardwaj, Chandan, Axsen, Jonn, and McCollum, David. Tue . "How to design a zero-emissions vehicle mandate? Simulating impacts on sales, GHG emissions and cost-effectiveness using the AUtomaker-Consumer Model (AUM)". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.012. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1887671.
@article{osti_1887671,
title = {How to design a zero-emissions vehicle mandate? Simulating impacts on sales, GHG emissions and cost-effectiveness using the AUtomaker-Consumer Model (AUM)},
author = {Bhardwaj, Chandan and Axsen, Jonn and McCollum, David},
abstractNote = {We report although numerous studies investigate the impacts of policy on zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) sales, few address the impacts of a ZEV sales mandate and its particular design features. We use the AUtomaker-consumer Model (AUM) to simulate varying designs of a ZEV mandate in Canada's light-duty vehicle sector, requiring 30% ZEV sales by 2030. Design features include: different penalties for non-compliance, different allocations of credits per ZEV type, and the allowance of banking credits across years. For each policy design, we consider impacts on ZEV adoption, GHG emissions, consumer surplus, automaker profits, and overall policy cost-effectiveness. Results demonstrate trade-offs among the policy designs. Generally, ZEV mandate designs that are more effective at increasing ZEV adoption and decreasing GHG emissions also induce larger reductions in consumer surplus and automaker profits. To achieve the ZEV sales goal, simulations show that a higher non-compliance penalty (CDN$ 10k per credit) is needed. ZEV adoption and GHG reductions are also improved by a “One credit per ZEV” scheme, rather than a “California-style” scheme that gives multiple credits per battery-electric vehicle. Further, allowing automakers to bank credits softens the policy impact on profit and increases automaker compliance in initial years. Across these different design combinations, we find that the most cost-effective design ($CDN/tonne mitigated, including consumer surplus and automaker profits impacts) utilizes a $10k non-compliance penalty and “One credit per ZEV” system that allows banking. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of various ZEV mandate design features, and the complex trade-offs involved among various policy goals.},
doi = {10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.012},
journal = {Transport Policy},
number = 1,
volume = 117,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Dec 28 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Tue Dec 28 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

ADOPT: A Historically Validated Light Duty Vehicle Consumer Choice Model
conference, April 2015

  • Brooker, Aaron; Gonder, Jeffrey; Lopp, Sean
  • SAE 2015 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-0974

Cost Implications for Automaker Compliance of Zero Emissions Vehicle Requirements
journal, December 2018

  • Jenn, Alan; Hardman, Scott; Carley, Sanya
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03635

How open are Canadian households to electric vehicles? A national latent class choice analysis with willingness-to-pay and metropolitan characterization
journal, January 2018

  • Ferguson, Mark; Mohamed, Moataz; Higgins, Christopher D.
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 58
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.006

Trends in income and price elasticities of transport demand (1850–2010)
journal, November 2012


Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles
journal, August 2009


Assessing the progress toward lower priced long range battery electric vehicles
journal, January 2019


From lab-to-road: real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
journal, May 2021

  • Plötz, Patrick; Moll, Cornelius; Bieker, Georg
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abef8c

Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach
journal, March 2017

  • Brand, Christian; Cluzel, Celine; Anable, Jillian
  • Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 97
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.017

Robustness and Real Options for Vehicle Design and Investment Decisions Under Gas Price and Regulatory Uncertainties
journal, July 2018

  • Kang, Namwoo; Bayrak, Alparslan Emrah; Papalambros, Panos Y.
  • Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1115/1.4040629

Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect
journal, January 2007


Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany
journal, March 2016

  • Hackbarth, André; Madlener, Reinhard
  • Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 85
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.005

A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions
journal, November 2004

  • Michalek, Jeremy J.; Papalambros, Panos Y.; Skerlos, Steven J.
  • Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 126, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1115/1.1804195

A Study of the Diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach*: Diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles
journal, February 2011


How policy can build the plug-in electric vehicle market: Insights from the REspondent-based Preference And Constraints (REPAC) model
journal, April 2017


Market introduction strategies for alternative powertrains in long-range passenger cars under competition
journal, June 2016

  • Thies, Christian; Kieckhäfer, Karsten; Spengler, Thomas Stefan
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 45
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.05.002

The Price of Gasoline and New Vehicle Fuel Economy: Evidence from Monthly Sales Data
journal, August 2010

  • Klier, Thomas; Linn, Joshua
  • American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1257/pol.2.3.134

Public policy and the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S.: The role of the zero emission vehicles mandates
journal, December 2014


Individual Time Preferences and Energy Efficiency
journal, May 2015

  • Newell, Richard G.; Siikamäki, Juha
  • American Economic Review, Vol. 105, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151010

MPG, fuel costs, or savings? Exploring the role of information framing in consumer valuation of fuel economy using a choice experiment
journal, April 2021

  • Long, Zoe; Kormos, Christine; Sussman, Reuven
  • Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 146
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.004

Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the “bottom-up” energy-systems ERIS model
journal, August 2004


Evaluating US Fuel Economy Standards in a Model with Producer and Household Heterogeneity
journal, May 2013

  • Jacobsen, Mark R.
  • American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1257/pol.5.2.148

Why do firms use high discount rates?
journal, June 2016


Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Increased US Gasoline Taxes
journal, May 2009

  • Bento, Antonio M.; Goulder, Lawrence H.; Jacobsen, Mark R.
  • American Economic Review, Vol. 99, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.3.667

Reaching 30% plug-in vehicle sales by 2030: Modeling incentive and sales mandate strategies in Canada
journal, December 2018

  • Axsen, Jonn; Wolinetz, Michael
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 65
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.012

Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation
journal, February 2016


Designing car bans for sustainable transportation
journal, July 2019


Consumer valuation of changes in driving range: A meta-analysis
journal, September 2013

  • Dimitropoulos, Alexandros; Rietveld, Piet; van Ommeren, Jos N.
  • Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 55
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.08.001

Meta-analysis of public transport demand
journal, December 2007


How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners?
journal, August 2016

  • Axsen, Jonn; Goldberg, Suzanne; Bailey, Joseph
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 47
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.015

Are Consumers Myopic? Evidence from New and Used Car Purchases
journal, February 2013

  • Busse, Meghan R.; Knittel, Christopher R.; Zettelmeyer, Florian
  • American Economic Review, Vol. 103, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.220

The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies
journal, December 2008


On the electrification of road transport - Learning rates and price forecasts for hybrid-electric and battery-electric vehicles
journal, September 2012


Latent demand for zero-emissions vehicles in Canada (Part 2): Insights from a stated choice experiment
journal, February 2019

  • Kormos, Christine; Axsen, Jonn; Long, Zoe
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 67
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.010

Energy policies for passenger motor vehicles
journal, July 2012


The role of a low carbon fuel standard in achieving long-term GHG reduction targets
journal, August 2018


How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups
journal, February 2014


Impact assessment in the automotive industry: mandatory market introduction of alternative powertrain technologies
journal, July 2010

  • Walther, Grit; Wansart, Jörg; Kieckhäfer, Karsten
  • System Dynamics Review, Vol. 26, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/sdr.453