DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Decarbonization potential of on-road fuels and powertrains in the European Union and the United States: a well-to-wheels assessment

Abstract

Transportation is fundamental for any modern economy, but its growing energy demand and the related climate impact call for urgent action. Life-cycle analysis (LCA) is a suitable approach to assessing the greenhouse gas (GHG) performance and decarbonization potential of transportation fuels and vehicle powertrains. Here, we assessed well-to-wheels (WTW) GHG emission reductions for a wide set of light-duty vehicle fuel and powertrain technologies used in the European Union (EU) and the United States (U.S.) for their decarbonization potential. We focused on the similarities and differences of the results and the underlying methodologies and data of the two analyses. We evaluated the decarbonization potential of new fuel–vehicle systems in Europe and the United States in comparison to the baseline petroleum gasoline and diesel vehicles in each market. For the transportation fuels examined in both regions, waste-to-fuel technologies and drop-in renewable diesel fuels (biofuels) produced from residues offer the biggest opportunities for reducing per-energy-unit GHG emissions, but may be limited in scale-up potentials given feedstock availabilities, qualities, and logistics challenges. The potential benefits of electricity and hydrogen as fuels span a wide range, determined by the primary energy source and the potential deployment of carbon capture and sequestration technologies. From a tank-to-wheelsmore » perspective, electric powertrains, with higher energy efficiency than internal combustion engines, provide incontrovertible evidence of GHG savings. For vehicle–fuel combined systems, the per km WTW results from GREET are generally higher than the JEC estimates, owing to greater vehicle fuel consumption attributable to larger vehicle sizes and more aggressive driving cycles in the U.S. This paper highlights key drivers of WTW fuel–vehicle system GHG emissions as well as opportunities and limitations to decarbonize light-duty transportation in Europe and the United States with promising alternative fuel production and vehicle powertrain technologies. Results show that major solutions in both regions are aligned, despite certain differences in the methodologies and results of the WTW analyses. As well as informing optimal selection of fuel and powertrain technologies for future vehicles, these findings are also useful in informing how existing vehicles can best be decarbonized through the use of renewable fuels and advanced powertrain technologies.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [3];  [4];  [5]
  1. Systems Assessment Center, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
  2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  3. Concawe, Bruxelles, Belgium
  4. Directorate General Climate Acton (DG-CLIMA), European Commission, Bruxelles, Belgium
  5. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO)
OSTI Identifier:
1885178
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1995413
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH113; AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Sustainable Energy & Fuels Journal Volume: 6 Journal Issue: 19; Journal ID: ISSN 2398-4902
Publisher:
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Cai, Hao, Prussi, Matteo, Ou, Longwen, Wang, Michael, Yugo, Marta, Lonza, Laura, and Scarlat, Nicolae. Decarbonization potential of on-road fuels and powertrains in the European Union and the United States: a well-to-wheels assessment. United Kingdom: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1039/D2SE00411A.
Cai, Hao, Prussi, Matteo, Ou, Longwen, Wang, Michael, Yugo, Marta, Lonza, Laura, & Scarlat, Nicolae. Decarbonization potential of on-road fuels and powertrains in the European Union and the United States: a well-to-wheels assessment. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00411A
Cai, Hao, Prussi, Matteo, Ou, Longwen, Wang, Michael, Yugo, Marta, Lonza, Laura, and Scarlat, Nicolae. Tue . "Decarbonization potential of on-road fuels and powertrains in the European Union and the United States: a well-to-wheels assessment". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00411A.
@article{osti_1885178,
title = {Decarbonization potential of on-road fuels and powertrains in the European Union and the United States: a well-to-wheels assessment},
author = {Cai, Hao and Prussi, Matteo and Ou, Longwen and Wang, Michael and Yugo, Marta and Lonza, Laura and Scarlat, Nicolae},
abstractNote = {Transportation is fundamental for any modern economy, but its growing energy demand and the related climate impact call for urgent action. Life-cycle analysis (LCA) is a suitable approach to assessing the greenhouse gas (GHG) performance and decarbonization potential of transportation fuels and vehicle powertrains. Here, we assessed well-to-wheels (WTW) GHG emission reductions for a wide set of light-duty vehicle fuel and powertrain technologies used in the European Union (EU) and the United States (U.S.) for their decarbonization potential. We focused on the similarities and differences of the results and the underlying methodologies and data of the two analyses. We evaluated the decarbonization potential of new fuel–vehicle systems in Europe and the United States in comparison to the baseline petroleum gasoline and diesel vehicles in each market. For the transportation fuels examined in both regions, waste-to-fuel technologies and drop-in renewable diesel fuels (biofuels) produced from residues offer the biggest opportunities for reducing per-energy-unit GHG emissions, but may be limited in scale-up potentials given feedstock availabilities, qualities, and logistics challenges. The potential benefits of electricity and hydrogen as fuels span a wide range, determined by the primary energy source and the potential deployment of carbon capture and sequestration technologies. From a tank-to-wheels perspective, electric powertrains, with higher energy efficiency than internal combustion engines, provide incontrovertible evidence of GHG savings. For vehicle–fuel combined systems, the per km WTW results from GREET are generally higher than the JEC estimates, owing to greater vehicle fuel consumption attributable to larger vehicle sizes and more aggressive driving cycles in the U.S. This paper highlights key drivers of WTW fuel–vehicle system GHG emissions as well as opportunities and limitations to decarbonize light-duty transportation in Europe and the United States with promising alternative fuel production and vehicle powertrain technologies. Results show that major solutions in both regions are aligned, despite certain differences in the methodologies and results of the WTW analyses. As well as informing optimal selection of fuel and powertrain technologies for future vehicles, these findings are also useful in informing how existing vehicles can best be decarbonized through the use of renewable fuels and advanced powertrain technologies.},
doi = {10.1039/D2SE00411A},
journal = {Sustainable Energy & Fuels},
number = 19,
volume = 6,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Sep 27 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Tue Sep 27 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00411A

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Wells to wheels: Environmental implications of natural gas as a transportation fuel
journal, October 2017


Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment
journal, January 2018

  • Elgowainy, Amgad; Han, Jeongwoo; Ward, Jacob
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006

Summary of Expansions and Updates in GREET® 2020
report, October 2020


Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States
journal, January 2013

  • Cai, Hao; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Wang, Zhichao
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-141

Retrospective analysis of the U.S. corn ethanol industry for 20052019 : implications for greenhouse gas emission reductions
journal, May 2021

  • Lee, Uisung; Kwon, Hoyoung; Wu, May
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2225

Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
journal, October 2015

  • Kelly, Jarod C.; Sullivan, John L.; Burnham, Andrew
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03192

Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context
journal, October 2011


Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use
journal, December 2012


Review of technologies for biomethane production and assessment of Eu transport share in 2030
journal, June 2019


Evaluation of landfill gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills for the life-cycle analysis of waste-to-energy pathways
journal, November 2017


The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling's role in its reduction
journal, January 2015

  • Dunn, J. B.; Gaines, L.; Kelly, J. C.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/C4EE03029J

Energy, economic, and environmental benefits assessment of co-optimized engines and bio-blendstocks
journal, January 2020

  • Dunn, Jennifer B.; Newes, Emily; Cai, Hao
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/D0EE00716A

CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels
journal, October 2021


Analysis of standard and innovative methods for allocating upstream and refinery GHG emissions to oil products
journal, November 2017


Well-to-Wheels Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Canadian Oil Sands Products: Implications for U.S. Petroleum Fuels
journal, June 2015

  • Cai, Hao; Brandt, Adam R.; Yeh, Sonia
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01255

Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, March 2016

  • Qin, Zhangcai; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Kwon, Hoyoung
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12333

A comparative assessment of resource efficiency in petroleum refining
journal, October 2015


Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Tight Oil Production in the Bakken Formation
journal, October 2016


Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Shale
journal, January 2017


Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2013

  • Dunn, Jennifer B.; Mueller, Steffen; Kwon, Ho-young
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-51