Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models
Abstract
Capacity expansion models for the power sector are used to project future decisions over the coming decades by simulating investment and operation decisions for the use of electricity. Due to model performance constraints, these models typically do not explicitly simulate every hour within a year, but instead simulate representative time segments (groups of hours). This paper evaluates different approaches for selecting time segments across three methods: sequential, categorical, and clustering, across a wide range of time-segment quantities, for a total of 204 temporal profiles. To measure the performance of each profile's ability to accurately represent data, the root-mean-square-error of each profile's time segments are compared to the data's original hourly data. The temporal alignment across regions is also measured (i.e., how often windy days align across regions). Different spatial resolutions were applied for a subset of the temporal selection methods to investigate the impact spatial resolution has on performance. This paper provides a framework for measuring the value of different temporal selection methods and of adding more granular data to energy system models. Overall, multi-criteria clustering yields the lowest root-mean-square-error across all datasets evaluated and provides a holistic view of the intertwined relationships between renewable generation and electricity demand.
- Authors:
-
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Air and Radiation
- Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
- National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Strategic Programs
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1869693
- Report Number(s):
- NREL/JA-6A20-79959
Journal ID: ISSN 0360-5442; MainId:41164;UUID:fbec3862-71eb-4e69-a380-f92b574c81da;MainAdminID:64553
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC36-08GO28308; 2017789
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Energy
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 251; Journal ID: ISSN 0360-5442
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; capacity expansion planning; electrical load; energy system modeling; renewable energy; spatial resolution; temporal resolution
Citation Formats
Marcy, Cara, Goforth, Teagan, Nock, Destenie, and Brown, Maxwell. Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models. United States: N. p., 2022.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123969.
Marcy, Cara, Goforth, Teagan, Nock, Destenie, & Brown, Maxwell. Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123969
Marcy, Cara, Goforth, Teagan, Nock, Destenie, and Brown, Maxwell. Thu .
"Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123969. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1869693.
@article{osti_1869693,
title = {Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models},
author = {Marcy, Cara and Goforth, Teagan and Nock, Destenie and Brown, Maxwell},
abstractNote = {Capacity expansion models for the power sector are used to project future decisions over the coming decades by simulating investment and operation decisions for the use of electricity. Due to model performance constraints, these models typically do not explicitly simulate every hour within a year, but instead simulate representative time segments (groups of hours). This paper evaluates different approaches for selecting time segments across three methods: sequential, categorical, and clustering, across a wide range of time-segment quantities, for a total of 204 temporal profiles. To measure the performance of each profile's ability to accurately represent data, the root-mean-square-error of each profile's time segments are compared to the data's original hourly data. The temporal alignment across regions is also measured (i.e., how often windy days align across regions). Different spatial resolutions were applied for a subset of the temporal selection methods to investigate the impact spatial resolution has on performance. This paper provides a framework for measuring the value of different temporal selection methods and of adding more granular data to energy system models. Overall, multi-criteria clustering yields the lowest root-mean-square-error across all datasets evaluated and provides a holistic view of the intertwined relationships between renewable generation and electricity demand.},
doi = {10.1016/j.energy.2022.123969},
journal = {Energy},
number = ,
volume = 251,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 14 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Apr 14 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}
Works referenced in this record:
The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation
journal, November 2018
- Sepulveda, Nestor A.; Jenkins, Jesse D.; de Sisternes, Fernando J.
- Joule, Vol. 2, Issue 11
The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook
journal, November 2011
- Solomon, Barry D.; Krishna, Karthik
- Energy Policy, Vol. 39, Issue 11
Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison
journal, September 2020
- Huntington, Hillard G.; Bhargava, Abha; Daniels, David
- Energy Policy, Vol. 144
Chronological Time-Period Clustering for Optimal Capacity Expansion Planning With Storage
journal, November 2018
- Pineda, Salvador; Morales, Juan M.
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 33, Issue 6
Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study
journal, May 2019
- Nock, Destenie; Baker, Erin
- Applied Energy, Vol. 242
Simulation versus Optimisation: Theoretical Positions in Energy System Modelling
journal, June 2017
- Lund, Henrik; Arler, Finn; Østergaard, Poul
- Energies, Vol. 10, Issue 7
Long-term uncertainties in generation expansion planning: Implications for electricity market modelling and policy
journal, July 2021
- Scott, Ian J.; Carvalho, Pedro M. S.; Botterud, Audun
- Energy, Vol. 227
Simulating Annual Variation in Load, Wind, and Solar by Representative Hour Selection
journal, July 2018
- Blanford, Geoffrey J.; Merrick, James H.; Bistline, John E. T.
- The Energy Journal, Vol. 39, Issue 3
Quantification of climate-induced interannual variability in residential U.S. electricity demand
journal, December 2021
- Eshraghi, Hadi; Rodrigo de Queiroz, Anderson; Sankarasubramanian, A.
- Energy, Vol. 236
Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling
journal, October 2016
- Nahmmacher, Paul; Schmid, Eva; Hirth, Lion
- Energy, Vol. 112
Coordinated expansion planning problem considering wind farms, energy storage systems and demand response
journal, January 2022
- Hamidpour, Hamidreza; Aghaei, Jamshid; Pirouzi, Sasan
- Energy, Vol. 239
Policy implications of downscaling the time dimension in power system planning models to represent variability in renewable output
journal, September 2018
- Reichenberg, Lina; Siddiqui, Afzal S.; Wogrin, Sonja
- Energy, Vol. 159
Representative days selection for district energy system optimisation: a solar district heating system with seasonal storage
journal, August 2019
- van der Heijde, Bram; Vandermeulen, Annelies; Salenbien, Robbe
- Applied Energy, Vol. 248
Modelling geothermal resource utilization by incorporating resource dynamics, capacity expansion, and development costs
journal, January 2020
- Spittler, Nathalie; Shafiei, Ehsan; Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
- Energy, Vol. 190
Renewable heating strategies and their consequences for storage and grid infrastructures comparing a smart grid to a smart energy systems approach
journal, May 2018
- Lund, Henrik
- Energy, Vol. 151
Impact of model resolution on scenario outcomes for electricity sector system expansion
journal, November 2018
- Mallapragada, Dharik S.; Papageorgiou, Dimitri J.; Venkatesh, Aranya
- Energy, Vol. 163
The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the U.S. electricity system
journal, October 2018
- Mai, Trieu; Bistline, John; Sun, Yinong
- Energy Economics, Vol. 76
Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition
journal, May 2021
- Chang, Miguel; Thellufsen, Jakob Zink; Zakeri, Behnam
- Applied Energy, Vol. 290