DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100

Abstract

Aims: High-resolution information on soils’ vulnerability to climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission scenarios. Location: Continental United States. Time period: 2014–2100. Methods: We used recent SOC field observations (n = 6,213 sites), environmental factors (n = 32), and an ensemble machine learning (ML) approach to estimate baseline SOC stocks in surface soils across the continental United States at 100-m spatial resolution, and decadal changes under the projected climate scenarios of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase Six (CMIP6) earth system models (ESMs). Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations, whereas ESMs represented only 6–16% of observed SOC variability. ML estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or sequestration) across 46–51% of continental US land area. These differences are attributablemore » to the high-resolution site-specific data used in the ML models compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in CMIP6 ESMs. Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order) that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs, because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs is controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation. Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate results.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5]
  1. Bioscience Division Sandia National Laboratory Livermore California USA, Joint BioEnergy Institute Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Emeryville California USA
  2. Joint BioEnergy Institute Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Emeryville California USA, Energy Analysis &, Environmental Impact Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA, Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA, Energy &, Biosciences Institute University of California Berkeley California USA
  3. National Soil Survey Center USDA‐NRCS Lincoln Nebraska USA
  4. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory USDA‐ARS Temple Texas USA
  5. Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont Illinois USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1855887
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1866517; OSTI ID: 1882904; OSTI ID: 1916472
Report Number(s):
SAND2022-3171J
Journal ID: ISSN 1466-822X
Grant/Contract Number:  
NA0003525; AC02-05CH11231; AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Ecology and Biogeography Journal Volume: 31 Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 1466-822X
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; climate; earth system model; environmental factor; future projection; machine learning; soil organic carbon

Citation Formats

Gautam, Sagar, Mishra, Umakant, Scown, Corinne D., Wills, Skye A., Adhikari, Kabindra, and Drewniak, Beth A. Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100. United Kingdom: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1111/geb.13489.
Gautam, Sagar, Mishra, Umakant, Scown, Corinne D., Wills, Skye A., Adhikari, Kabindra, & Drewniak, Beth A. Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13489
Gautam, Sagar, Mishra, Umakant, Scown, Corinne D., Wills, Skye A., Adhikari, Kabindra, and Drewniak, Beth A. Sun . "Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13489.
@article{osti_1855887,
title = {Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100},
author = {Gautam, Sagar and Mishra, Umakant and Scown, Corinne D. and Wills, Skye A. and Adhikari, Kabindra and Drewniak, Beth A.},
abstractNote = {Aims: High-resolution information on soils’ vulnerability to climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission scenarios. Location: Continental United States. Time period: 2014–2100. Methods: We used recent SOC field observations (n = 6,213 sites), environmental factors (n = 32), and an ensemble machine learning (ML) approach to estimate baseline SOC stocks in surface soils across the continental United States at 100-m spatial resolution, and decadal changes under the projected climate scenarios of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase Six (CMIP6) earth system models (ESMs). Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations, whereas ESMs represented only 6–16% of observed SOC variability. ML estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or sequestration) across 46–51% of continental US land area. These differences are attributable to the high-resolution site-specific data used in the ML models compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in CMIP6 ESMs. Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order) that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs, because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs is controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation. Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate results.},
doi = {10.1111/geb.13489},
journal = {Global Ecology and Biogeography},
number = 6,
volume = 31,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Sun Mar 20 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Sun Mar 20 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13489

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics
journal, October 2018


Climate-smart soils
journal, April 2016

  • Paustian, Keith; Lehmann, Johannes; Ogle, Stephen
  • Nature, Vol. 532, Issue 7597
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature17174

Potential responses of soil organic carbon to global environmental change
journal, August 1997


The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
journal, January 2016


Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw
journal, August 2020

  • Hugelius, Gustaf; Loisel, Julie; Chadburn, Sarah
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, Issue 34
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1916387117

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016


Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century
journal, January 2014


CLIMATE CHANGE: Permafrost and the Global Carbon Budget
journal, June 2006


Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author)
journal, August 2001


The International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) System: Design, Theory, and Implementation
journal, November 2018

  • Collier, Nathan; Hoffman, Forrest M.; Lawrence, David M.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001354

Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
journal, June 2004


Assessing soil organic carbon stock of Wisconsin, USA and its fate under future land use and climate change
journal, June 2019


Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon in the Conterminous United States
book, January 2014


Spatial Patterns of Soil Organic Carbon in the Contiguous United States
journal, January 1994


Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming
journal, November 2016

  • Crowther, T. W.; Todd-Brown, K. E. O.; Rowe, C. W.
  • Nature, Vol. 540, Issue 7631
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature20150

Soil carbon 4 per mille
journal, April 2017


Spatial representation of organic carbon and active-layer thickness of high latitude soils in CMIP5 earth system models
journal, August 2017


Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates
journal, October 2017

  • Koven, Charles D.; Hugelius, Gustaf; Lawrence, David M.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3421

Machine learning in space and time for modelling soil organic carbon change
journal, June 2020

  • Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.; Angelini, Marcos E.; Poggio, Laura
  • European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 72, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12998

An observation-based constraint on permafrost loss as a function of global warming
journal, April 2017

  • Chadburn, S. E.; Burke, E. J.; Cox, P. M.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3262

Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
journal, October 2011

  • Schmidt, Michael W. I.; Torn, Margaret S.; Abiven, Samuel
  • Nature, Vol. 478, Issue 7367
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature10386

Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world
journal, October 2017


Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use
journal, August 2017

  • Sanderman, Jonathan; Hengl, Tomislav; Fiske, Gregory J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, Issue 36
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706103114

machine.
journal, October 2001


Long-term tillage and drainage influences on soil organic carbon dynamics, aggregate stability and corn yield
journal, January 2014


Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations
journal, January 2013


Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates - synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward
journal, August 2011


Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003
journal, September 2005

  • Bellamy, Pat H.; Loveland, Peter J.; Bradley, R. Ian
  • Nature, Vol. 437, Issue 7056
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature04038

The Vertical Distribution of soil Organic Carbon and its Relation to Climate and Vegetation
journal, April 2000


Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes
journal, July 2013

  • Wieder, William R.; Bonan, Gordon B.; Allison, Steven D.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1951

Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales
journal, January 2019


On the Temperature Dependence of Soil Respiration
journal, June 1994

  • Lloyd, J.; Taylor, J. A.
  • Functional Ecology, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/2389824

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models: SOIL CARBON MODELING
journal, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlström, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239

Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble
journal, February 2013


Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets
journal, September 2014

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Andrew, R. M.; Rogelj, J.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2248

Quantity and Spatial Variability of Soil Carbon in the Conterminous United States
journal, January 2006

  • Guo, Yinyan; Amundson, Ronald; Gong, Peng
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 70, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0162

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks under future climate change in south-eastern Australia
journal, January 2022


Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production
journal, May 1993

  • Melillo, Jerry M.; McGuire, A. David; Kicklighter, David W.
  • Nature, Vol. 363, Issue 6426
  • DOI: 10.1038/363234a0

Permafrost thawing puts the frozen carbon at risk over the Tibetan Plateau
journal, May 2020


Earth system models: an overview: Earth system models
journal, November 2011

  • Flato, Gregory M.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.148

Uncertain future soil carbon dynamics under global change predicted by models constrained by total carbon measurements
journal, March 2017

  • Luo, Zhongkui; Wang, Enli; Sun, Osbert J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 27, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.1504

Active-Layer Thickness across Alaska: Comparing Observation-Based Estimates with CMIP5 Earth System Model Predictions
journal, January 2014

  • Mishra, Umakant; Riley, William J.
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 78, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.11.0484

Responses of ecosystem carbon cycle to experimental warming: a meta-analysis
journal, March 2013


The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
journal, January 2017


Sorghum biomass production in the continental United States and its potential impacts on soil organic carbon and nitrous oxide emissions
journal, August 2020

  • Gautam, Sagar; Mishra, Umakant; Scown, Corinne D.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12736

Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model
journal, February 1988

  • Parton, W. J.; Stewart, J. W. B.; Cole, C. V.
  • Biogeochemistry, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02180320