DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Regional environmental controllers influence continental scale soil carbon stocks and future carbon dynamics

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the influence of environmental factors on soil organic carbon (SOC) is critical for quantifying and reducing the uncertainty in carbon climate feedback projections under changing environmental conditions. We explored the effect of climatic variables, land cover types, topographic attributes, soil types and bedrock geology on SOC stocks of top 1 m depth across conterminous United States (US) ecoregions. Using 4559 soil profile observations and high-resolution data of environmental factors, we identified dominant environmental controllers of SOC stocks in 21 US ecoregions using geographically weighted regression. We used projected climatic data of SSP126 and SSP585 scenarios from GFDL-ESM 4 Earth System Model of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 to predict SOC stock changes across continental US between 2030 and 2100. Both baseline and predicted changes in SOC stocks were compared with SOC stocks represented in GFDL-ESM4 projections. Among 56 environmental predictors, we found 12 as dominant controllers across all ecoregions. The adjusted geospatial model with the 12 environmental controllers showed an R 2 of 0.48 in testing dataset. Higher precipitation and lower temperatures were associated with higher levels of SOC stocks in majority of ecoregions. Changes in land cover types (vegetation properties) was important in drier ecosystem as Northmore » American deserts, whereas soil types and topography were more important in American prairies. Wetlands of the Everglades was highly sensitive to projected temperature changes. The SOC stocks did not change under SSP126 until 2100, however SOC stocks decreased up to 21% under SSP585. Our results, based on environmental controllers of SOC stocks, help to predict impacts of changing environmental conditions on SOC stocks more reliably and may reduce uncertainties found in both, geospatial and Earth System Models. In addition, the description of different environmental controllers for US ecoregions can help to describe the scope and importance of global and local models.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1771821
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1781547
Report Number(s):
SAND-2021-2732J
Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322; 6474; PII: 85992
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC04-94AL85000; AC02-05CH11231; NA0003525
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Scientific Reports
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Scientific Reports Journal Volume: 11 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; Biogeochemistry; Carbon cycle

Citation Formats

Gonçalves, Daniel Ruiz Potma, Mishra, Umakant, Wills, Skye, and Gautam, Sagar. Regional environmental controllers influence continental scale soil carbon stocks and future carbon dynamics. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85992-y.
Gonçalves, Daniel Ruiz Potma, Mishra, Umakant, Wills, Skye, & Gautam, Sagar. Regional environmental controllers influence continental scale soil carbon stocks and future carbon dynamics. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85992-y
Gonçalves, Daniel Ruiz Potma, Mishra, Umakant, Wills, Skye, and Gautam, Sagar. Fri . "Regional environmental controllers influence continental scale soil carbon stocks and future carbon dynamics". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85992-y.
@article{osti_1771821,
title = {Regional environmental controllers influence continental scale soil carbon stocks and future carbon dynamics},
author = {Gonçalves, Daniel Ruiz Potma and Mishra, Umakant and Wills, Skye and Gautam, Sagar},
abstractNote = {Abstract Understanding the influence of environmental factors on soil organic carbon (SOC) is critical for quantifying and reducing the uncertainty in carbon climate feedback projections under changing environmental conditions. We explored the effect of climatic variables, land cover types, topographic attributes, soil types and bedrock geology on SOC stocks of top 1 m depth across conterminous United States (US) ecoregions. Using 4559 soil profile observations and high-resolution data of environmental factors, we identified dominant environmental controllers of SOC stocks in 21 US ecoregions using geographically weighted regression. We used projected climatic data of SSP126 and SSP585 scenarios from GFDL-ESM 4 Earth System Model of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 to predict SOC stock changes across continental US between 2030 and 2100. Both baseline and predicted changes in SOC stocks were compared with SOC stocks represented in GFDL-ESM4 projections. Among 56 environmental predictors, we found 12 as dominant controllers across all ecoregions. The adjusted geospatial model with the 12 environmental controllers showed an R 2 of 0.48 in testing dataset. Higher precipitation and lower temperatures were associated with higher levels of SOC stocks in majority of ecoregions. Changes in land cover types (vegetation properties) was important in drier ecosystem as North American deserts, whereas soil types and topography were more important in American prairies. Wetlands of the Everglades was highly sensitive to projected temperature changes. The SOC stocks did not change under SSP126 until 2100, however SOC stocks decreased up to 21% under SSP585. Our results, based on environmental controllers of SOC stocks, help to predict impacts of changing environmental conditions on SOC stocks more reliably and may reduce uncertainties found in both, geospatial and Earth System Models. In addition, the description of different environmental controllers for US ecoregions can help to describe the scope and importance of global and local models.},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-85992-y},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
number = 1,
volume = 11,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Mar 19 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Fri Mar 19 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

A spatial emergent constraint on the sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to global warming
journal, November 2020

  • Varney, Rebecca M.; Chadburn, Sarah E.; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19208-8

Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
journal, June 1996


Global Vegetation and Climate Change due to Future Increases in CO2 as Projected by a Fully Coupled Model with Dynamic Vegetation*
journal, January 2007

  • Notaro, Michael; Vavrus, Steve; Liu, Zhengyu
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 20, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3989.1

Predicting soil bulk density for incomplete databases
journal, January 2014


Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016

  • Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016

Leveraging Environmental Research and Observation Networks to Advance Soil Carbon Science
journal, May 2019

  • Weintraub, Samantha R.; Flores, Alejandro N.; Wieder, William R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 124, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JG004956

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models: SOIL CARBON MODELING
journal, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlström, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239

Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework
journal, September 2014


Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations
journal, January 2013

  • Todd-Brown, K. E. O.; Randerson, J. T.; Post, W. M.
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-1717-2013

Continental-scale soil carbon composition and vulnerability modulated by regional environmental controls
journal, June 2019


Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world
journal, November 2008


Soil organic carbon across scales
journal, June 2015

  • O'Rourke, Sharon M.; Angers, Denis A.; Holden, Nicholas M.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12959

Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets
journal, September 2014

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Andrew, R. M.; Rogelj, J.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2248

Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
journal, June 2004


Validation of the Aster Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 over the Conterminous United States
journal, January 2012

  • Gesch, D.; Oimoen, M.; Zhang, Z.
  • ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIX-B4
  • DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B4-281-2012

Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability and dependence on environmental factors
journal, January 2012


Particulate air pollution from wildfires in the Western US under climate change
journal, July 2016

  • Liu, Jia Coco; Mickley, Loretta J.; Sulprizio, Melissa P.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 138, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1762-6

Explicitly representing soil microbial processes in Earth system models: Soil microbes in earth system models
journal, October 2015

  • Wieder, William R.; Allison, Steven D.; Davidson, Eric A.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 29, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005188

Tree regeneration following wildfires in the western US: a review
journal, May 2019


Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems
journal, September 2014

  • Carvalhais, Nuno; Forkel, Matthias; Khomik, Myroslava
  • Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7521
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13731

Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate
journal, August 2015

  • Doetterl, Sebastian; Stevens, Antoine; Six, Johan
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2516

Storage, patterns and controls of soil organic carbon in the Tibetan grasslands
journal, July 2008


Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches
journal, April 2016


Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawing
journal, January 2012


Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil
journal, April 2019


The spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in tidal wetland soils of the continental United States
journal, August 2017

  • Hinson, Audra L.; Feagin, Rusty A.; Eriksson, Marian
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 23, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13811

Geographically weighted regression with a non-Euclidean distance metric: a case study using hedonic house price data
journal, October 2013

  • Lu, Binbin; Charlton, Martin; Harris, Paul
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 28, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.865739