DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries

Abstract

We discuss gaseous streams in biorefineries that have been undervalued and underutilized. In cellulosic biorefineries, coproduced biogas is assumed to be combusted alongside lignin to generate process heat and electricity. Biogas can instead be upgraded to compressed biomethane and used as a transportation fuel. Capturing CO2-rich streams generated in biorefineries can also contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation goals. We explore the economic and life-cycle GHG impacts of biogas upgrading and CO2 capture and storage (CCS) at ionic liquid-based cellulosic ethanol biorefineries using biomass sorghum. Without policy incentives, biorefineries with biogas upgrading systems can achieve a comparable minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) and reduced GHG footprint ($1.38/liter gasoline equivalent (LGE) and 12.9 gCO2e/MJ) relative to facilities that combust biogas onsite ($1.34/LGE and 24.3 gCO2e/MJ). Incorporating renewable identification number (RIN) values advantages facilities that upgrade biogas relative to other options (MESP of $0.72/LGE). Incorporating CCS increases the MESP but dramatically decreases the GHG footprint (-21.3 gCO2e/MJ for partial, -110.7 gCO2e/MJ for full CCS). The addition of CCS also decreases the cost of carbon mitigation to as low as $52-$78/t CO2, depending on the assumed fuel selling price, and is the lowest-cost option if both RIN and California's Low Carbon Fuel Standardmore » credits are incorporated.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1841711
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; 1739676
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 54; Journal Issue: 20; Journal ID: ISSN 0013-936X
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; biogas upgrading; carbon capture and storage (CCS); cellulosic biorefinery; renewable fuel policy; technoeconomic analysis; life-cycle assessment

Citation Formats

Yang, Minliang, Baral, Nawa Raj, Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini, Breunig, Hanna M., and Scown, Corinne D. Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02816.
Yang, Minliang, Baral, Nawa Raj, Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini, Breunig, Hanna M., & Scown, Corinne D. Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02816
Yang, Minliang, Baral, Nawa Raj, Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini, Breunig, Hanna M., and Scown, Corinne D. Thu . "Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02816. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1841711.
@article{osti_1841711,
title = {Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries},
author = {Yang, Minliang and Baral, Nawa Raj and Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini and Breunig, Hanna M. and Scown, Corinne D.},
abstractNote = {We discuss gaseous streams in biorefineries that have been undervalued and underutilized. In cellulosic biorefineries, coproduced biogas is assumed to be combusted alongside lignin to generate process heat and electricity. Biogas can instead be upgraded to compressed biomethane and used as a transportation fuel. Capturing CO2-rich streams generated in biorefineries can also contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation goals. We explore the economic and life-cycle GHG impacts of biogas upgrading and CO2 capture and storage (CCS) at ionic liquid-based cellulosic ethanol biorefineries using biomass sorghum. Without policy incentives, biorefineries with biogas upgrading systems can achieve a comparable minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) and reduced GHG footprint ($1.38/liter gasoline equivalent (LGE) and 12.9 gCO2e/MJ) relative to facilities that combust biogas onsite ($1.34/LGE and 24.3 gCO2e/MJ). Incorporating renewable identification number (RIN) values advantages facilities that upgrade biogas relative to other options (MESP of $0.72/LGE). Incorporating CCS increases the MESP but dramatically decreases the GHG footprint (-21.3 gCO2e/MJ for partial, -110.7 gCO2e/MJ for full CCS). The addition of CCS also decreases the cost of carbon mitigation to as low as $52-$78/t CO2, depending on the assumed fuel selling price, and is the lowest-cost option if both RIN and California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits are incorporated.},
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.0c02816},
journal = {Environmental Science and Technology},
number = 20,
volume = 54,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Oct 08 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Thu Oct 08 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States
journal, January 2013

  • Cai, Hao; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Wang, Zhichao
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-141

Techno-economic analysis and life-cycle greenhouse gas mitigation cost of five routes to bio-jet fuel blendstocks
journal, January 2019

  • Baral, Nawa Raj; Kavvada, Olga; Mendez-Perez, Daniel
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/C8EE03266A

Transforming biomass conversion with ionic liquids: process intensification and the development of a high-gravity, one-pot process for the production of cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2016

  • Xu, Feng; Sun, Jian; Konda, N. V. S. N. Murthy
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02940F

Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation
journal, November 2015


Integrating Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment with Multiobjective Optimization: A Modeling Framework
journal, January 2016

  • Yue, Dajun; Pandya, Shyama; You, Fengqi
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04279

Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?
journal, January 2017

  • Fajardy, Mathilde; Mac Dowell, Niall
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1039/C7EE00465F

Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading
journal, January 2015

  • Chen, Xiao Yuan; Vinh-Thang, Hoang; Ramirez, Antonio Avalos
  • RSC Advances, Vol. 5, Issue 31
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5RA00666J

Bioenergy and full carbon dioxide sinking in sugarcane-biorefinery with post-combustion capture and storage: Techno-economic feasibility
journal, November 2019


Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector
journal, September 2017

  • Psarras, Peter C.; Comello, Stephen; Bains, Praveen
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01723

Strategies for near-term scale-up of cellulosic biofuel production using sorghum and crop residues in the US
journal, November 2018

  • Cui, Xinguang; Kavvada, Olga; Huntington, Tyler
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aae6e3

Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States
journal, April 2018

  • Sanchez, Daniel L.; Johnson, Nils; McCoy, Sean T.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719695115

Role of Lignin in Reducing Life-Cycle Carbon Emissions, Water Use, and Cost for United States Cellulosic Biofuels
journal, July 2014

  • Scown, Corinne D.; Gokhale, Amit A.; Willems, Paul A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5012753

Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock
journal, October 2007

  • Rooney, William L.; Blumenthal, Jürg; Bean, Brent
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.15

Accelerating the Deployment of Anaerobic Digestion to Meet Zero Waste Goals
journal, November 2018

  • Satchwell, Andrew J.; Scown, Corinne D.; Smith, Sarah Josephine
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04481

Integrated biorefineries: CO2 utilization for maximum biomass conversion
journal, July 2015


The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal
journal, November 2019


Lifecycle greenhouse gas implications of US national scenarios for cellulosic ethanol production
journal, January 2012

  • Scown, Corinne D.; Nazaroff, William W.; Mishra, Umakant
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014011

Empirical Evidence for the Potential Climate Benefits of Decarbonizing Light Vehicle Transport in the U.S. with Bioenergy from Purpose-Grown Biomass with and without BECCS
journal, February 2020

  • Gelfand, Ilya; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Kravchenko, Alexandra N.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 54, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07019

One-pot integrated biofuel production using low-cost biocompatible protic ionic liquids
journal, January 2017

  • Sun, Jian; Konda, N. V. S. N. Murthy; Parthasarathi, Ramakrishnan
  • Green Chemistry, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1039/C7GC01179B

Carbon dioxide capture from flue gases using microalgae: Engineering aspects and biorefinery concept
journal, June 2012

  • Pires, J. C. M.; Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.; Martins, F. G.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.055

Accumulation of high-value bioproducts in planta can improve the economics of advanced biofuels
journal, March 2020

  • Yang, Minliang; Baral, Nawa Raj; Simmons, Blake A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000053117

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO2 Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas
journal, August 2011


Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Water Intensity of Cellulosic Biofuel Production Using Cholinium Lysinate Ionic Liquid Pretreatment
journal, September 2017

  • Neupane, Binod; Konda, N. V. S. N. Murthy; Singh, Seema
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02116

Comparative material balances around pretreatment technologies for the conversion of switchgrass to soluble sugars
journal, December 2011


Carbon dioxide utilization in a microalga-based biorefinery: Efficiency of carbon removal and economic performance under carbon taxation
journal, December 2017

  • Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda; Brigagão, George Victor; de Medeiros, José Luiz
  • Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 203
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.005

Techno-economic analysis (TEA) of low-moisture anhydrous ammonia (LMAA) pretreatment method for corn stover
journal, December 2015


Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture
journal, September 2009


Prospects for bioenergy with carbon capture & storage (BECCS) in the United States pulp and paper industry
journal, January 2020

  • Sagues, W. J.; Jameel, H.; Sanchez, D. L.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/D0EE01107J

The Cost of Carbon Capture and Storage for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants
journal, March 2012

  • Rubin, Edward S.; Zhai, Haibo
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es204514f

Sorghum biomass production in the continental United States and its potential impacts on soil organic carbon and nitrous oxide emissions
journal, August 2020

  • Gautam, Sagar; Mishra, Umakant; Scown, Corinne D.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12736

Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Human Health Trade-Offs of Organic Waste Management Strategies
journal, July 2020

  • Nordahl, Sarah L.; Devkota, Jay P.; Amirebrahimi, Jahon
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 54, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00364

A comparative study of ethanol production using dilute acid, ionic liquid and AFEX™ pretreated corn stover
journal, January 2014

  • Uppugundla, Nirmal; da Costa Sousa, Leonardo; Chundawat, Shishir PS
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-72

Integration of power plant and amine scrubbing to reduce CO2 capture costs
journal, June 2008


Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes
journal, December 2006


A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading
journal, September 2015

  • Muñoz, Raúl; Meier, Leslie; Diaz, Israel
  • Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, Vol. 14, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11157-015-9379-1