DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region

Abstract

Producing bioenergy feedstocks on non‐crop land can largely avoid the food price feedbacks of energy biomass production on cropland. The U.S. northern tier grassland‐to‐forest ecotone offers large areas of marginal land that is not currently cropped. In this ecological transition zone, the relative profitability of grassy vs. woody sources of energy biomass is little studied. This paper reports an exploratory investment analysis of cellulosic biomass production in the northern Great Lakes region. It compares two short‐rotation tree crops, willow ( Salix sachalinensis F. Schmidt)and hybrid poplar ( Populus nigra L. X P. maximowiczii A. Henry), and switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) (a native prairie grass) to conventional mixed hay. Because biomass markets are not yet well developed, this study calculates threshold prices and yields at which biomass crops become at least as profitable as mixed grass hay. At 2010–2012 prices and available production technologies, none of the cellulosic crops is competitive with the hay baseline system. The breakeven price of energy biomass ranges from $90–100 per oven‐dry Mg −1 for all three energy crops. Breakeven yields are much more variable, due to the high cost of harvesting woody biomass. At 2010–2012 prices, necessary biomass yield increases range from 3.5‐fold formore » switchgrass and willow to over 25‐fold for poplar. While the ratio of input costs to revenue remains relatively constant between the northern and southern Great Lakes regions, the opportunity cost of active cropland in the southern zone is much higher, implying an economic comparative advantage for marginal land of the northern tier of the Great Lakes region.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. Dep. of Economics George Mason Univ. Fairfax VA 22030
  2. Dep. of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics Michigan State Univ. East Lansing MI 48824
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1787172
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-07ER64494
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Agronomy Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Agronomy Journal Journal Volume: 106 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0002-1962
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Kells, Bradley J., and Swinton, Scott M. Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region. United States: N. p., 2014. Web. doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0397.
Kells, Bradley J., & Swinton, Scott M. Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region. United States. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0397
Kells, Bradley J., and Swinton, Scott M. Sat . "Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region". United States. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0397.
@article{osti_1787172,
title = {Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region},
author = {Kells, Bradley J. and Swinton, Scott M.},
abstractNote = {Producing bioenergy feedstocks on non‐crop land can largely avoid the food price feedbacks of energy biomass production on cropland. The U.S. northern tier grassland‐to‐forest ecotone offers large areas of marginal land that is not currently cropped. In this ecological transition zone, the relative profitability of grassy vs. woody sources of energy biomass is little studied. This paper reports an exploratory investment analysis of cellulosic biomass production in the northern Great Lakes region. It compares two short‐rotation tree crops, willow ( Salix sachalinensis F. Schmidt)and hybrid poplar ( Populus nigra L. X P. maximowiczii A. Henry), and switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) (a native prairie grass) to conventional mixed hay. Because biomass markets are not yet well developed, this study calculates threshold prices and yields at which biomass crops become at least as profitable as mixed grass hay. At 2010–2012 prices and available production technologies, none of the cellulosic crops is competitive with the hay baseline system. The breakeven price of energy biomass ranges from $90–100 per oven‐dry Mg −1 for all three energy crops. Breakeven yields are much more variable, due to the high cost of harvesting woody biomass. At 2010–2012 prices, necessary biomass yield increases range from 3.5‐fold for switchgrass and willow to over 25‐fold for poplar. While the ratio of input costs to revenue remains relatively constant between the northern and southern Great Lakes regions, the opportunity cost of active cropland in the southern zone is much higher, implying an economic comparative advantage for marginal land of the northern tier of the Great Lakes region.},
doi = {10.2134/agronj2013.0397},
journal = {Agronomy Journal},
number = 2,
volume = 106,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2014},
month = {Sat Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2014}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0397

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

N<sub>2</sub>O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels
journal, January 2008

  • Crutzen, P. J.; Mosier, A. R.; Smith, K. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-389-2008

Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses
journal, March 2010


Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
journal, July 2006

  • Hill, J.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, Issue 30
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604600103

Rates of Return in the Farm and Nonfarm Sectors: How Do They Compare?
journal, December 2004

  • Erickson, Kenneth W.; Moss, Charles B.; Mishra, Ashok K.
  • Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 36, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800027024

Harvest mechanization helps agriculture remain competitive
journal, May 2000

  • Thompson, James F.; Blank, Steven C.
  • California Agriculture, Vol. 54, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3733/ca.v054n03p51

Life-Cycle Assessment of net Greenhouse-Gas flux for Bioenergy Cropping Systems
journal, April 2007

  • Adler, Paul R.; Grosso, Stephen J. Del; Parton, William J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1890/05-2018

The US Ethanol and Biofuels Boom: Its Origins, Current Status, and Future Prospects
journal, July 2008


The relative cost of biomass energy transport
journal, April 2007

  • Searcy, Erin; Flynn, Peter; Ghafoori, Emad
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 137-140, Issue 1-12
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12010-007-9085-8

Bioenergy Crops and Carbon Sequestration
journal, February 2005


The Global Potential of Bioenergy on Abandoned Agriculture Lands
journal, August 2008

  • Campbell, J. Elliott; Lobell, David B.; Genova, Robert C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/es800052w

Biomass supply from alternative cellulosic crops and crop residues: A spatially explicit bioeconomic modeling approach
journal, November 2011


Biofuels: Potential Production Capacity, Effects on Grain and Livestock Sectors, and Implications for Food Prices and Consumers
journal, August 2009

  • Hayes, Dermot; Babcock, Bruce; Fabiosa, Jacinto
  • Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800002935

Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited
journal, September 2011


Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
journal, February 2008


Profitability Analysis of Cellulosic Energy Crops Compared with Corn
journal, January 2010

  • James, Laura K.; Swinton, Scott M.; Thelen, Kurt D.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 102, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0289

Supply of Cellulosic Biofuel Feedstocks and Regional Production Pattern
journal, November 2010

  • Khanna, Madhu; Chen, Xiaoguang; Huang, Haixiao
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aaq119

Measuring Indirect Land Use Change with Biofuels: Implications for Policy
journal, August 2012


The Economics of Biomass Collection and Transportation and Its Supply to Indiana Cellulosic and Electric Utility Facilities
journal, January 2011

  • Brechbill, Sarah C.; Tyner, Wallace E.; Ileleji, Klein E.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-010-9108-0

Geographical patterns in openland cover and hayfield mowing in the Upper Great Lakes region: implications for grassland bird conservation
journal, November 2008

  • Corace, R. Gregory; Flaspohler, David J.; Shartell, Lindsey M.
  • Landscape Ecology, Vol. 24, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9306-8

Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
journal, February 2008


Renewable Energy from Willow Biomass Crops: Life Cycle Energy, Environmental and Economic Performance
journal, September 2005

  • Keoleian, Gregory A.; Volk, Timothy A.
  • Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue 5-6
  • DOI: 10.1080/07352680500316334

Yield and Breakeven Price of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass for Biofuels in Tennessee
journal, January 2009

  • Mooney, Daniel F.; Roberts, Roland K.; English, Burton C.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 101, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0090