DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The PAU Survey: an improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field

Abstract

Here we present – and make publicly available – accurate and precise photometric redshifts in the ACS footprint from the COSMOS field for objects with iAB ≤ 23. The redshifts are computed using a combination of narrow-band photometry from PAUS, a survey with 40 narrow bands spaced at $$100\,\mathring{\rm A}$$ intervals covering the range from 4500 to $$8500\,\mathring{\rm A}$$, and 26 broad, intermediate, and narrow bands covering the UV, visible and near-infrared spectrum from the COSMOS2015 catalogue. We introduce a new method that models the spectral energy distributions as a linear combination of continuum and emission-line templates and computes its Bayes evidence, integrating over the linear combinations. The correlation between the UV luminosity and the $$\mathrm{O\,{\small II}}$$ line is measured using the 66 available bands with the zCOSMOS spectroscopic sample, and used as a prior which constrains the relative flux between continuum and emission-line templates. The flux ratios between the $$\mathrm{O\,{\small II}}$$ line and Hα, Hβ and $$\mathrm{O\,{\small III}}$$ are similarly measured and used to generate the emission-line templates. Comparing to public spectroscopic surveys via the quantity Δz ≡ (zphoto – zspec)/(1 + zspec), we find the photometric redshifts to be more precise than previous estimates, with σ68z) ≈ (0.003, 0.009) for galaxies at magnitude iAB ~ 18 and iAB ~ 23, respectively, which is three times and 1.66 times tighter than COSMOS2015. Additionally, we find the redshifts to be very accurate on average, yielding a median of the Δz distribution compatible with |median(Δz)| ≤ 0.001 at all redshifts and magnitudes considered. Both the added PAUS data and new methodology contribute significantly to the improved results. The catalogue produced with the technique presented here is expected to provide a robust redshift calibration for current and future lensing surveys, and allows one to probe galaxy formation physics in an unexplored luminosity-redshift regime, thanks to its combination of depth, completeness, and excellent redshift precision and accuracy.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4];  [3];  [2];  [3];  [2];  [5];  [3]; ORCiD logo [6];  [7]; ORCiD logo [8];  [9]; ORCiD logo [10];  [11];  [10];  [3]; ORCiD logo [2];  [5] more »;  [2];  [5]; ORCiD logo [3];  [5] « less
  1. HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA, Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), E-08034 Barcelona, Spain
  2. Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), E-08034 Barcelona, Spain
  3. Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
  4. Institute for Computational Cosmology (ICC), Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK, Institute for Data Science (IDAS), Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
  5. CIEMAT, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Avda. Complutenes 40, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  6. Instituto de Fisica Teorica (IFT-UAM/CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
  7. Ruhr-University Bochum, Astronomical Institute, German Centre for Cosmological Lensing, Universitätsstr. 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
  8. Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden, the Netherlands
  9. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
  10. Institute for Computational Cosmology (ICC), Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK, Institute for Data Science (IDAS), Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK, Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy (CEA), Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
  11. Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), E-08010 Barcelona, Spain
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation of Spain (MINECO); European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); Generalitat de Catalunya; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); European Union’s Horizon 2020; German Research Foundation (DFG); National Science Centre of Poland (NCN); Ministry of Science and Innovation
OSTI Identifier:
1763442
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1765162
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357; CSD2007-00060; AYA2015-71825; ESP2017-89838; PGC2018-094773; PGC2018-102021; SEV-2016-0588; SEV-2016-0597; MDM-2015-0509; 734374; 776247; 639.043.512; Hi 1495/5-1; 770935; 754510; UMO-2016/23/N/ST9/02963
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Volume: 501 Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; cosmology; galaxy evolution; photometric redshifts

Citation Formats

Alarcon, Alex, Gaztanaga, Enrique, Eriksen, Martin, Baugh, Carlton M., Cabayol, Laura, Casas, Ricard, Carretero, Jorge, Castander, Francisco J., De Vicente, Juan, Fernandez, Enrique, Garcia-Bellido, Juan, Hildebrandt, Hendrik, Hoekstra, Henk, Joachimi, Benjamin, Manzoni, Giorgio, Miquel, Ramon, Norberg, Peder, Padilla, Cristobal, Renard, Pablo, Sanchez, Eusebio, Serrano, Santiago, Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio, Siudek, Malgorzata, and Tallada-Crespí, Pau. The PAU Survey: an improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3659.
Alarcon, Alex, Gaztanaga, Enrique, Eriksen, Martin, Baugh, Carlton M., Cabayol, Laura, Casas, Ricard, Carretero, Jorge, Castander, Francisco J., De Vicente, Juan, Fernandez, Enrique, Garcia-Bellido, Juan, Hildebrandt, Hendrik, Hoekstra, Henk, Joachimi, Benjamin, Manzoni, Giorgio, Miquel, Ramon, Norberg, Peder, Padilla, Cristobal, Renard, Pablo, Sanchez, Eusebio, Serrano, Santiago, Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio, Siudek, Malgorzata, & Tallada-Crespí, Pau. The PAU Survey: an improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3659
Alarcon, Alex, Gaztanaga, Enrique, Eriksen, Martin, Baugh, Carlton M., Cabayol, Laura, Casas, Ricard, Carretero, Jorge, Castander, Francisco J., De Vicente, Juan, Fernandez, Enrique, Garcia-Bellido, Juan, Hildebrandt, Hendrik, Hoekstra, Henk, Joachimi, Benjamin, Manzoni, Giorgio, Miquel, Ramon, Norberg, Peder, Padilla, Cristobal, Renard, Pablo, Sanchez, Eusebio, Serrano, Santiago, Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio, Siudek, Malgorzata, and Tallada-Crespí, Pau. Fri . "The PAU Survey: an improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3659.
@article{osti_1763442,
title = {The PAU Survey: an improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field},
author = {Alarcon, Alex and Gaztanaga, Enrique and Eriksen, Martin and Baugh, Carlton M. and Cabayol, Laura and Casas, Ricard and Carretero, Jorge and Castander, Francisco J. and De Vicente, Juan and Fernandez, Enrique and Garcia-Bellido, Juan and Hildebrandt, Hendrik and Hoekstra, Henk and Joachimi, Benjamin and Manzoni, Giorgio and Miquel, Ramon and Norberg, Peder and Padilla, Cristobal and Renard, Pablo and Sanchez, Eusebio and Serrano, Santiago and Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio and Siudek, Malgorzata and Tallada-Crespí, Pau},
abstractNote = {Here we present – and make publicly available – accurate and precise photometric redshifts in the ACS footprint from the COSMOS field for objects with iAB ≤ 23. The redshifts are computed using a combination of narrow-band photometry from PAUS, a survey with 40 narrow bands spaced at $100\,\mathring{\rm A}$ intervals covering the range from 4500 to $8500\,\mathring{\rm A}$, and 26 broad, intermediate, and narrow bands covering the UV, visible and near-infrared spectrum from the COSMOS2015 catalogue. We introduce a new method that models the spectral energy distributions as a linear combination of continuum and emission-line templates and computes its Bayes evidence, integrating over the linear combinations. The correlation between the UV luminosity and the $\mathrm{O\,{\small II}}$ line is measured using the 66 available bands with the zCOSMOS spectroscopic sample, and used as a prior which constrains the relative flux between continuum and emission-line templates. The flux ratios between the $\mathrm{O\,{\small II}}$ line and Hα, Hβ and $\mathrm{O\,{\small III}}$ are similarly measured and used to generate the emission-line templates. Comparing to public spectroscopic surveys via the quantity Δz ≡ (zphoto – zspec)/(1 + zspec), we find the photometric redshifts to be more precise than previous estimates, with σ68(Δz) ≈ (0.003, 0.009) for galaxies at magnitude iAB ~ 18 and iAB ~ 23, respectively, which is three times and 1.66 times tighter than COSMOS2015. Additionally, we find the redshifts to be very accurate on average, yielding a median of the Δz distribution compatible with |median(Δz)| ≤ 0.001 at all redshifts and magnitudes considered. Both the added PAUS data and new methodology contribute significantly to the improved results. The catalogue produced with the technique presented here is expected to provide a robust redshift calibration for current and future lensing surveys, and allows one to probe galaxy formation physics in an unexplored luminosity-redshift regime, thanks to its combination of depth, completeness, and excellent redshift precision and accuracy.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3659},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 4,
volume = 501,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Jan 22 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Fri Jan 22 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3659

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross‐Correlations
journal, September 2008

  • Newman, Jeffrey A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 684, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/589982

A Stellar Spectral Flux Library: 1150–25000 Å
journal, July 1998

  • Pickles, A. J. 
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 110, Issue 749
  • DOI: 10.1086/316197

CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing: quantifying accurate redshift distributions
journal, March 2013

  • Benjamin, Jonathan; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Heymans, Catherine
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 431, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt276

Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects
journal, February 1981

  • Baldwin, J. A.; Phillips, M. M.; Terlevich, R.
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 93
  • DOI: 10.1086/130766

First data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program
journal, October 2017

  • Aihara, Hiroaki; Armstrong, Robert; Bickerton, Steven
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx081

Pan-STARRS1 variability of XMM-COSMOS AGN: I. Impact on photometric redshifts⋆⋆⋆
journal, December 2015


First results from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey
journal, January 1999

  • Collessy, Matthew
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 357, Issue 1750
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1999.0317

Planck 2015 results : X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps
journal, September 2016


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018


Dust extinction of the stellar continua in starburst galaxies: The ultraviolet and optical extinction law
journal, July 1994

  • Calzetti, Daniela; Kinney, Anne L.; Storchi-Bergmann, Thaisa
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 429
  • DOI: 10.1086/174346

The synthetic Emission Line COSMOS catalogue: Hα and [O ii] galaxy luminosity functions and counts at 0.3 < z < 2.5
journal, March 2020

  • Saito, Shun; de la Torre, Sylvain; Ilbert, Olivier
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 494, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa727

PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT AND CLASSIFICATION FOR THE XMM -COSMOS SOURCES
journal, December 2008


Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2018


DISSECTING PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT FOR ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS USING XMM - AND CHANDRA -COSMOS SAMPLES
journal, November 2011


Galaxy–Galaxy lensing in HSC: Validation tests and the impact of heterogeneous spectroscopic training sets
journal, October 2019

  • Speagle, Joshua S.; Leauthaud, Alexie; Huang, Song
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2968

Near-infrared MOSFIRE Spectra of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies at 0.2 < z < 4
journal, May 2017

  • Casey, Caitlin M.; Cooray, Asantha; Killi, Meghana
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 840, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6cb1

CosmoHub: Interactive exploration and distribution of astronomical data on Hadoop
journal, July 2020


VIS 3 COS : I. Survey overview and the role of environment and stellar mass on star formation⋆⋆⋆
journal, December 2018


Propagating sample variance uncertainties in redshift calibration: simulations, theory, and application to the COSMOS2015 data
journal, August 2020

  • Sánchez, Carles; Raveri, Marco; Alarcon, Alex
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2542

Shards: an Optical Spectro-Photometric Survey of Distant Galaxies
journal, December 2012

  • Pérez-González, Pablo G.; Cava, Antonio; Barro, Guillermo
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 762, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/46

Redshift inference from the combination of galaxy colours and clustering in a hierarchical Bayesian model
journal, November 2018

  • Sánchez, Carles; Bernstein, Gary M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 483, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3222

A Critical Assessment of Photometric Redshift Methods: a Candels Investigation
journal, September 2013


Horizon-AGN virtual observatory – 1. SED-fitting performance and forecasts for future imaging surveys
journal, April 2019

  • Laigle, C.; Davidzon, I.; Ilbert, O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 486, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1054

Consistent cosmic shear in the face of systematics: a B -mode analysis of KiDS-450, DES-SV and CFHTLenS
journal, April 2019


Bayesian non-parametrics and the probabilistic approach to modelling
journal, February 2013

  • Ghahramani, Zoubin
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 371, Issue 1984
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0553

The DEIMOS 10K Spectroscopic Survey Catalog of the COSMOS Field
journal, May 2018


THE MOSFIRE DEEP EVOLUTION FIELD (MOSDEF) SURVEY: REST-FRAME OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR ∼1500 H -SELECTED GALAXIES AT $1.37\leqslant z\leqslant 3.8$
journal, May 2015

  • Kriek, Mariska; Shapley, Alice E.; Reddy, Naveen A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 218, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15

Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
journal, February 2006


THE CHANDRA COSMOS-LEGACY SURVEY: SOURCE X-RAY SPECTRAL PROPERTIES
journal, October 2016


The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
journal, November 2018

  • Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.; Allam, S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 239, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0

The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
journal, April 2000

  • Calzetti, Daniela; Armus, Lee; Bohlin, Ralph C.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 533, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/308692

Hierarchical Bayesian inference of galaxy redshift distributions from photometric surveys
journal, June 2016

  • Leistedt, Boris; Mortlock, Daniel J.; Peiris, Hiranya V.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1304

The Physics of the Accelerating Universe Camera
journal, June 2019

  • Padilla, Cristóbal; Castander, Francisco J.; Alarcón, Alex
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 157, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab0412

An Analysis of the Shapes of Interstellar Extinction Curves. V. The IR‐through‐UV Curve Morphology
journal, July 2007

  • Fitzpatrick, E. L.; Massa, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 663, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/518158

First Data Release of the COSMOS Ly α Mapping and Tomography Observations: 3D Ly α Forest Tomography at 2.05 < z < 2.55
journal, August 2018

  • Lee, Khee-Gan; Krolewski, Alex; White, Martin
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 237, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aace58

Spectral Energy Distributions of Hard X‐Ray Selected Active Galactic Nuclei in the XMM‐Newton Medium Deep Survey
journal, July 2007

  • Polletta, M.; Tajer, M.; Maraschi, L.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 663, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/518113

Redshift inference from the combination of galaxy colours and clustering in a hierarchical Bayesian model – Application to realistic N-body simulations
journal, August 2020

  • Alarcon, Alex; Sánchez, Carles; Bernstein, Gary M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2478

Photometric Redshift with Bayesian Priors on Physical Properties of Galaxies
journal, February 2015


THE COSMOS2015 CATALOG: EXPLORING THE 1 < z < 6 UNIVERSE WITH HALF A MILLION GALAXIES
journal, June 2016

  • Laigle, C.; McCracken, H. J.; Ilbert, O.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/24

THE zCOSMOS 10k-BRIGHT SPECTROSCOPIC SAMPLE
journal, September 2009

  • Lilly, Simon J.; Le Brun, Vincent; Maier, Christian
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 184, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/218

The Complete Calibration of the Color–Redshift Relation (C3R2) Survey: Survey Overview and Data Release 1
journal, May 2017

  • Masters, Daniel C.; Stern, Daniel K.; Cohen, Judith G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 841, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f08

Calibration errors unleashed: effects on cosmological parameters and requirements for large-scale structure surveys
journal, May 2013

  • Huterer, Dragan; Cunha, Carlos E.; Fang, Wenjuan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt653

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts – methods and systematics characterization
journal, February 2018

  • Gatti, M.; Vielzeuf, P.; Davis, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty466

The FMOS-COSMOS Survey of Star-forming Galaxies at z ∼ 1.6. VI. Redshift and Emission-line Catalog and Basic Properties of Star-forming Galaxies
journal, March 2019

  • Kashino, Daichi; Silverman, John D.; Sanders, David
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 241, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06c4

The ALHAMBRA Survey: Bayesian photometric redshifts with 23 bands for 3 deg2
journal, May 2014

  • Molino, A.; Benítez, N.; Moles, M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 441, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu387

Recovering redshift distributions with cross-correlations: pushing the boundaries
journal, April 2013

  • Schmidt, Samuel J.; Ménard, Brice; Scranton, Ryan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 431, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt410

CFHTLenS: improving the quality of photometric redshifts with precision photometry★: CFHTLenS: photometric redshifts
journal, February 2012


Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology
journal, July 2006

  • Coe, Dan; Benítez, Narciso; Sánchez, Sebastián F.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 132, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/505530

Radiative transfer in a clumpy universe: The colors of high-redshift galaxies
journal, March 1995

  • Madau, Piero
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 441
  • DOI: 10.1086/175332

Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
journal, June 2000

  • Benitez, Narciso
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 536, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/308947

Surrogate modelling the Baryonic Universe – I. The colour of star formation
journal, May 2020

  • Chaves-Montero, Jonás; Hearin, Andrew
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 495, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1230

CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
journal, October 2016

  • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Heymans, Catherine
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2665

The PAU survey: star–galaxy classification with multi narrow-band data
journal, November 2018

  • Cabayol, L.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Fernández, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 483, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3129

The many flavours of photometric redshifts
journal, June 2018


Gaia Data Release 1 : Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties
journal, November 2016


COSMOS PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS WITH 30-BANDS FOR 2-deg 2
journal, December 2008


Optical Star Formation Rate Indicators
journal, May 2006

  • Moustakas, John; Kennicutt, Jr., Robert C.; Tremonti, Christy A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 642, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/500964

The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview
journal, September 2007

  • Scoville, N.; Aussel, H.; Brusa, M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/516585

Sample variance in photometric redshift calibration: cosmological biases and survey requirements: Sample variance in photo-z calibration
journal, April 2012

  • Cunha, Carlos E.; Huterer, Dragan; Busha, Michael T.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 423, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20927.x

The Evolution of the Number Density of Large Disk Galaxies in COSMOS
journal, September 2007

  • Sargent, M. T.; Carollo, C. M.; Lilly, S. J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/516584

Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z ≃ 4 from UltraVISTA
journal, July 2013


Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
journal, August 2019

  • Buchs, R.; Davis, C.; Gruen, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2162

Some Aspects of Measurement Error in Linear Regression of Astronomical Data
journal, August 2007

  • Kelly, Brandon C.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 665, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/519947

Photometric redshifts for Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Data Release 1
journal, October 2017

  • Tanaka, Masayuki; Coupon, Jean; Hsieh, Bau-Ching
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx077

Theoretical values for the [O iii] 5007/4959 line-intensity ratio and homologous cases
journal, March 2000


Cosmic‐Ray Rejection by Laplacian Edge Detection
journal, November 2001

  • van Dokkum, Pieter G.
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 113, Issue 789
  • DOI: 10.1086/323894

A tale of two Mysteries in Interstellar Astrophysics: the 2175 Å Extinction bump and Diffuse Interstellar Bands
journal, May 2011


The PAU Survey: Operation and orchestration of multi-band survey data
journal, April 2019


The PAU Survey: early demonstration of photometric redshift performance in the COSMOS field
journal, January 2019

  • Eriksen, M.; Alarcon, A.; Gaztanaga, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 484, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz204

DNF – Galaxy photometric redshift by Directional Neighbourhood Fitting
journal, April 2016

  • De Vicente, J.; Sánchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw857

KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
journal, November 2016

  • Hildebrandt, H.; Viola, M.; Heymans, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2805

Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
journal, October 2003


Recombination line intensities for hydrogenic ions-IV. Total recombination coefficients and machine-readable tables for Z=1 to 8
journal, January 1995

  • Storey, P. J.; Hummer, D. G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 272, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/272.1.41

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
journal, April 2018

  • Hoyle, B.; Gruen, D.; Bernstein, G. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty957

Near-infrared Emission Lines in Starburst Galaxies at 0.5 < z < 0.9: Discovery of a Merger Sequence of Extreme Obscurations
journal, August 2018


Mapping the Galaxy Color–Redshift Relation: Optimal Photometric Redshift Calibration Strategies for Cosmology Surveys
journal, October 2015


Dust attenuation in z ~ 1 galaxies from Herschel and 3D-HST H α measurements
journal, January 2016


Bright Lyman- α emitters among Spitzer SMUVS galaxies in the MUSE/COSMOS field
journal, January 2020


Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing
journal, August 2016


KiDS+VIKING-450: Cosmic shear tomography with optical and infrared data
journal, January 2020


The Complete Calibration of the Color–Redshift Relation (C3R2) Survey: Analysis and Data Release 2
journal, May 2019

  • Masters, Daniel C.; Stern, Daniel K.; Cohen, Judith G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 877, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab184d

An analysis on the shapes of ultraviolet extinction curves. I - The 2175 A bump
journal, August 1986

  • Fitzpatrick, E. L.; Massa, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 307
  • DOI: 10.1086/164415

On Graphite and Interstellar Extinction
journal, November 1965

  • Stecher, T. P.; Donn, B.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 142
  • DOI: 10.1086/148461

Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
journal, March 2019

  • Hikage, Chiaki; Oguri, Masamune; Hamana, Takashi
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 71, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz010

Empirical Modeling of the Redshift Evolution of the $[{\rm{N}}\,{\rm{II}}]$/H α Ratio for Galaxy Redshift Surveys
journal, March 2018

  • Faisst, Andreas L.; Masters, Daniel; Wang, Yun
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 855, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab1fc

Selection biases in empirical p(z) methods for weak lensing
journal, February 2017

  • Gruen, D.; Brimioulle, F.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 468, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx471

KiDS+VIKING-450: A new combined optical and near-infrared dataset for cosmology and astrophysics
journal, November 2019


EAZY: A Fast, Public Photometric Redshift Code
journal, October 2008

  • Brammer, Gabriel B.; van Dokkum, Pieter G.; Coppi, Paolo
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 686, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/591786

Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence
journal, September 1998