DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis

Abstract

We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using information from Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and assuming the DES Year 1 metacalibration sample for the sources. We explore easily reproducible selections based on magnitude cuts in i -band as a function of (photometric) redshift, zphot , and benchmark the potential gains against those using the well-established redMaGiC [E. Rozo et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1431 (2016)] sample. We focus on the balance between density and photometric redshift accuracy, while marginalizing over a realistic set of cosmological and systematic parameters. Our optimal selection, the MagLim sample, satisfies i < 4 z phot + 18 and has ~ 30 % wider redshift distributions but ~ 3.5 times more galaxies than redMaGiC. Assuming a w CDM model (i.e. with a free parameter for the dark energy equation of state) and equivalent scale cuts to mitigate nonlinear effects, this leads to 40% increase in the figure of merit for the pair combinations of Ωm, w, and σ8, and gains of 16% in σ8, 10% in Ωm, and 12% in w. Similarly, in Λmore » CDM, we find an improvement of 19% and 27% on σ8 and Ωm, respectively. We also explore flux-limited samples with a flat magnitude cut finding that the optimal selection, i < 22.2, has ~ 7 times more galaxies and ~ 20% wider redshift distributions compared to MagLim, but slightly worse constraints. We show that our results are robust with respect to the assumed galaxy bias and photometric redshift uncertainties with only moderate further gains from increased number of tomographic bins or the inclusion of bin cross-correlations, except in the case of the flux-limited sample, for which these gains are more significant.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Nevada National Security Site/Mission Support and Test Services LLC (NNSS/MSTS), North Las Vegas, NV (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); European Union (EU); National Science Foundation (NSF); Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain); USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)
Contributing Org.:
DES Collaboration
OSTI Identifier:
1768202
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1763402; OSTI ID: 1807209; OSTI ID: 1872556
Report Number(s):
DES-2019-0482; FERMILAB-PUB-20-566-AD-AE; arXiv:2011.03411
Journal ID: ISSN 2470-0010; TRN: US2206533
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515; AC02-05CH11231; AC02-07CH11359; 465376/2014-2; SEV-2016-0588; SEV-2016-0597; MDM-2015-0509; PGC2018-094773; PGC2018-102021; ESP2017-89838; AST-1536171; AST-1138766; 291329; 240672; 306478; FP7/2007-2013; AC05-00OR22725; SC0019193
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review D
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 103; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 2470-0010
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

Citation Formats

Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Carnero Rosell, A., Cawthon, R., Eifler, T.  F., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Weaverdyck, N., Abbott, T.  M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S.  L., Brooks, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F.  J., Choi, A., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L.  N., Pereira, M.  E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H.  T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D.  W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R.  A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W.  G., Hinton, S.  R., Hollowood, D.  L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D.  J., Jarvis, M., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Maia, M.  A. G., Marshall, J.  L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A.  A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Roodman, A., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M.  E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Varga, T.  N., Weller, J., and Wilkinson, R.  D. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043503.
Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Carnero Rosell, A., Cawthon, R., Eifler, T.  F., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Weaverdyck, N., Abbott, T.  M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S.  L., Brooks, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F.  J., Choi, A., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L.  N., Pereira, M.  E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H.  T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D.  W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R.  A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W.  G., Hinton, S.  R., Hollowood, D.  L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D.  J., Jarvis, M., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Maia, M.  A. G., Marshall, J.  L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A.  A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Roodman, A., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M.  E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Varga, T.  N., Weller, J., & Wilkinson, R.  D. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.103.043503
Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Carnero Rosell, A., Cawthon, R., Eifler, T.  F., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Weaverdyck, N., Abbott, T.  M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S.  L., Brooks, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F.  J., Choi, A., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L.  N., Pereira, M.  E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H.  T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D.  W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R.  A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W.  G., Hinton, S.  R., Hollowood, D.  L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D.  J., Jarvis, M., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Maia, M.  A. G., Marshall, J.  L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A.  A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Roodman, A., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M.  E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Varga, T.  N., Weller, J., and Wilkinson, R.  D. Mon . "Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.103.043503. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1768202.
@article{osti_1768202,
title = {Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis},
author = {Porredon, A. and Crocce, M. and Fosalba, P. and Elvin-Poole, J. and Carnero Rosell, A. and Cawthon, R. and Eifler, T.  F. and Fang, X. and Ferrero, I. and Krause, E. and MacCrann, N. and Weaverdyck, N. and Abbott, T.  M. C. and Aguena, M. and Allam, S. and Amon, A. and Avila, S. and Bacon, D. and Bertin, E. and Bhargava, S. and Bridle, S.  L. and Brooks, D. and Carrasco Kind, M. and Carretero, J. and Castander, F.  J. and Choi, A. and Costanzi, M. and da Costa, L.  N. and Pereira, M.  E. S. and De Vicente, J. and Desai, S. and Diehl, H.  T. and Doel, P. and Drlica-Wagner, A. and Eckert, K. and Ferté, A. and Flaugher, B. and Frieman, J. and García-Bellido, J. and Gaztanaga, E. and Gerdes, D.  W. and Giannantonio, T. and Gruen, D. and Gruendl, R.  A. and Gschwend, J. and Gutierrez, G. and Hartley, W.  G. and Hinton, S.  R. and Hollowood, D.  L. and Honscheid, K. and Hoyle, B. and James, D.  J. and Jarvis, M. and Kuehn, K. and Kuropatkin, N. and Maia, M.  A. G. and Marshall, J.  L. and Menanteau, F. and Miquel, R. and Morgan, R. and Palmese, A. and Pandey, S. and Paz-Chinchón, F. and Plazas, A.  A. and Rodriguez-Monroy, M. and Roodman, A. and Samuroff, S. and Sanchez, E. and Scarpine, V. and Serrano, S. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and Smith, M. and Soares-Santos, M. and Suchyta, E. and Swanson, M.  E. C. and Tarle, G. and To, C. and Varga, T.  N. and Weller, J. and Wilkinson, R.  D.},
abstractNote = {We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using information from Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and assuming the DES Year 1 metacalibration sample for the sources. We explore easily reproducible selections based on magnitude cuts in i -band as a function of (photometric) redshift, zphot , and benchmark the potential gains against those using the well-established redMaGiC [E. Rozo et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1431 (2016)] sample. We focus on the balance between density and photometric redshift accuracy, while marginalizing over a realistic set of cosmological and systematic parameters. Our optimal selection, the MagLim sample, satisfies i < 4 z phot + 18 and has ~ 30 % wider redshift distributions but ~ 3.5 times more galaxies than redMaGiC. Assuming a w CDM model (i.e. with a free parameter for the dark energy equation of state) and equivalent scale cuts to mitigate nonlinear effects, this leads to 40% increase in the figure of merit for the pair combinations of Ωm, w, and σ8, and gains of 16% in σ8, 10% in Ωm, and 12% in w. Similarly, in Λ CDM, we find an improvement of 19% and 27% on σ8 and Ωm, respectively. We also explore flux-limited samples with a flat magnitude cut finding that the optimal selection, i < 22.2, has ~ 7 times more galaxies and ~ 20% wider redshift distributions compared to MagLim, but slightly worse constraints. We show that our results are robust with respect to the assumed galaxy bias and photometric redshift uncertainties with only moderate further gains from increased number of tomographic bins or the inclusion of bin cross-correlations, except in the case of the flux-limited sample, for which these gains are more significant.},
doi = {10.1103/physrevd.103.043503},
journal = {Physical Review D},
number = 4,
volume = 103,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: 3-yr results and first data release
journal, July 2017

  • Childress, M. J.; Lidman, C.; Davis, T. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1872

First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters
journal, September 2003

  • Spergel, D. N.; Verde, L.; Peiris, H. V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 148, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/377226

SExtractor: Software for source extraction
journal, June 1996

  • Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S.
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996164

Review of Particle Physics
journal, October 2016


Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
journal, May 2019


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018


SKA weak lensing – III. Added value of multiwavelength synergies for the mitigation of systematics
journal, October 2016

  • Camera, Stefano; Harrison, Ian; Bonaldi, Anna
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 464, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2688

Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models
journal, August 2000

  • Lewis, Antony; Challinor, Anthony; Lasenby, Anthony
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 538, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/309179

Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
journal, December 2015

  • Crocce, M.; Carretero, J.; Bauer, A. H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 455, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2590

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2018


redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG
journal, April 2014


The clustering of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data
journal, June 2007

  • Padmanabhan, Nikhil; Schlegel, David J.; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 378, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11593.x

Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
journal, December 2012

  • Takahashi, Ryuichi; Sato, Masanori; Nishimichi, Takahiro
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 761, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/152

Power spectrum super-sample covariance
journal, June 2013


Blinding multiprobe cosmological experiments
journal, April 2020

  • Muir, J.; Bernstein, G. M.; Huterer, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 494, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa965

The dark Energy Camera
journal, October 2015


Joint galaxy-lensing observables and the dark energy
journal, August 2004


The separate and combined effects of baryon physics and neutrino free streaming on large-scale structure
journal, June 2017

  • Mummery, Benjamin O.; McCarthy, Ian G.; Bird, Simeon
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 471, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1469

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
journal, March 2017

  • Alam, Shadab; Ata, Metin; Bailey, Stephen
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx721

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

The effects of galaxy formation on the matter power spectrum: a challenge for precision cosmology: Galaxy formation and the matter power spectrum
journal, July 2011


Cosmological parameters from the BOSS galaxy power spectrum
journal, May 2020

  • Ivanov, Mikhail M.; Simonović, Marko; Zaldarriaga, Matias
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/042

Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
journal, December 2007


Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
journal, November 2001

  • Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Annis, James; Gunn, James E.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 122, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1086/323717

cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
journal, May 2017

  • Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1261

Modelling the angular correlation function and its full covariance in photometric galaxy surveys: Angular clustering in photometric surveys
journal, March 2011


Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
journal, September 1998

  • Riess, Adam G.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Challis, Peter
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 116, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1086/300499

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
journal, July 2019


The impact of non-Gaussian errors on weak lensing surveys
journal, June 2009


On the validity of cosmological Fisher matrix forecasts
journal, September 2012

  • Wolz, Laura; Kilbinger, Martin; Weller, Jochen
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2012, Issue 09
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/009

The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
journal, November 2018

  • Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.; Allam, S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 239, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0

MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
journal, October 2009


The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
journal, May 2018

  • Morganson, E.; Gruendl, R. A.; Menanteau, F.
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 130, Issue 989
  • DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef

Analysis of two-point statistics of cosmic shear: III. Covariances of shear measures made easy
journal, November 2007


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
journal, September 2018

  • Cawthon, R.; Davis, C.; Gatti, M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2424

The cosmological analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
journal, May 2020

  • d'Amico, Guido; Gleyzes, Jérôme; Kokron, Nickolas
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/005

KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering
journal, October 2017

  • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Johnson, Andrew
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2820

Estimating the redshift distribution of photometric galaxy samples
journal, October 2008


Beyond Limber: efficient computation of angular power spectra for galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, May 2020

  • Fang, Xiao; Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/010

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts – methods and systematics characterization
journal, February 2018

  • Gatti, M.; Vielzeuf, P.; Davis, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty466

Karhunen‐Loeve Eigenvalue Problems in Cosmology: How Should We Tackle Large Data Sets?
journal, May 1997

  • Tegmark, Max; Taylor, Andy N.; Heavens, Alan F.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 480, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/303939

Extended Limber approximation
journal, December 2008


Optimizing galaxy samples for clustering measurements in photometric surveys
journal, November 2019

  • Tanoglidis, Dimitrios; Chang, Chihway; Frieman, Joshua
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3281

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
journal, September 2008


Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
journal, June 2000

  • Benitez, Narciso
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 536, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/308947

Recovering 3D clustering information with angular correlations: 3D clustering with angular correlations
journal, November 2012

  • Asorey, Jacobo; Crocce, Martin; Gaztañaga, Enrique
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 427, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21972.x

ANNz2: Photometric Redshift and Probability Distribution Function Estimation using Machine Learning
journal, August 2016


The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rykoff, E. S.; Rozo, E.; Hollowood, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/1

CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
journal, April 2012

  • Howlett, Cullan; Lewis, Antony; Hall, Alex
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2012, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/027

DES science portal: Computing photometric redshifts
journal, October 2018


Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra
journal, June 2003


Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies
journal, December 2006


Halo models of large scale structure
journal, December 2002


Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2020


KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering
journal, March 2018

  • van Uitert, Edo; Joachimi, Benjamin; Joudaki, Shahab
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty551

Tomographic galaxy clustering with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first year public data release
journal, March 2020

  • Nicola, Andrina; Alonso, David; Sánchez, Javier
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 03
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/044

The impact of galaxy formation on the total mass, mass profile and abundance of haloes
journal, June 2014

  • Velliscig, Marco; van Daalen, Marcel P.; Schaye, Joop
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 442, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1044

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
journal, December 2017


LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
journal, March 2019

  • Ivezić, Željko; Kahn, Steven M.; Tyson, J. Anthony
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 873, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

ChainConsumer
journal, August 2016


Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions with HSC survey first-year data
journal, February 2020

  • Hamana, Takashi; Shirasaki, Masato; Miyazaki, Satoshi
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 72, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz138

Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes
journal, October 2020


2D-FFTLog: efficient computation of real-space covariance matrices for galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, June 2020

  • Fang (方啸), Xiao; Eifler, Tim; Krause, Elisabeth
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 497, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1726

Clustering of LRGs in the DECaLS DR8 Footprint: Distance Constraints from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Using Photometric Redshifts
journal, November 2020

  • Sridhar, Srivatsan; Song, Yong-Seon; Ross, Ashley J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 904, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc0f0

Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Galaxy Surveys
journal, November 1997


The effect of active galactic nuclei feedback on the halo mass function
journal, May 2014

  • Cui, Weiguang; Borgani, Stefano; Murante, Giuseppe
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 441, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu673

CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation
journal, September 2015


Weak gravitational lensing
journal, January 2001


Galaxy clustering in the CFHTLS-Wide: the changing relationship between galaxies and haloes since z   ~  1.2
journal, May 2012


DNF – Galaxy photometric redshift by Directional Neighbourhood Fitting
journal, April 2016

  • De Vicente, J.; Sánchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw857

Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
journal, October 2003


Massive neutrinos and the non-linear matter power spectrum: The matter power with neutrinos
journal, January 2012


Controlling and leveraging small-scale information in tomographic galaxy–galaxy lensing
journal, October 2019

  • MacCrann, Niall; Blazek, Jonathan; Jain, Bhuvnesh
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2761

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
journal, April 2018

  • Hoyle, B.; Gruen, D.; Bernstein, G. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty957

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
journal, August 2018


Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
journal, September 2004


Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
journal, June 1999

  • Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 517, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/307221

Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
journal, March 2019

  • Hikage, Chiaki; Oguri, Masamune; Hamana, Takashi
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 71, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz010

redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Abate, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 461, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1281

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: galaxy sample for BAO measurement
journal, September 2018

  • Crocce, M.; Ross, A. J.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2522

The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Survey (VIPERS): First Data Release of 57 204 spectroscopic measurements
journal, January 2014