DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Variable-fidelity multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization with output-based adapted meshes

Abstract

This work presents a method to control the discretization error in multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using output-based adapted meshes. The meshes are adapted via adjoint-based error estimates, taking into account both the objective and constraint output errors. A multi-fidelity optimization framework is then developed by taking advantage of the variable fidelity offered by adaptive meshes. The objective functional and its sensitivity at each design point (operating condition) are first evaluated on the same initial coarse mesh, which is then subsequently adapted for each design point individually as the shape optimization proceeds. The effort to set up the optimization is minimal since the initial mesh can be fairly coarse and easy to generate. As the shape approaches the optimal design, the mesh at each design point becomes finer, in regions necessary for that particular operating condition. The multi-fidelity framework is tightly coupled with the objective error estimation to ensure the optimization accuracy at each fidelity. Computational savings arise from a reduction of the mesh size when the design is far from optimal and avoiding an exhaustive search on low-fidelity meshes. The proposed method is demonstrated on multipoint drag minimization problems of a transonic airfoil with lift and area constraints. Improved accuracymore » and efficiency are shown compared to traditional fixed-fidelity optimization with a fixed computational mesh.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1]
  1. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States). Dept. of Aerospace Engineering
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); Boeing Company
OSTI Identifier:
1851364
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1638297
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0010341; FG02-13ER26146; PC-1658167
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Aerospace Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 105; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1270-9638
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING; Engineering; Multipoint optimization; Variable-fidelity optimization; Discretization error; Adjoint-based error estimation; Mesh adaptation

Citation Formats

Chen, Guodong, and Fidkowski, Krzysztof J. Variable-fidelity multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization with output-based adapted meshes. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.106004.
Chen, Guodong, & Fidkowski, Krzysztof J. Variable-fidelity multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization with output-based adapted meshes. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106004
Chen, Guodong, and Fidkowski, Krzysztof J. Wed . "Variable-fidelity multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization with output-based adapted meshes". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106004. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1851364.
@article{osti_1851364,
title = {Variable-fidelity multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization with output-based adapted meshes},
author = {Chen, Guodong and Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.},
abstractNote = {This work presents a method to control the discretization error in multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using output-based adapted meshes. The meshes are adapted via adjoint-based error estimates, taking into account both the objective and constraint output errors. A multi-fidelity optimization framework is then developed by taking advantage of the variable fidelity offered by adaptive meshes. The objective functional and its sensitivity at each design point (operating condition) are first evaluated on the same initial coarse mesh, which is then subsequently adapted for each design point individually as the shape optimization proceeds. The effort to set up the optimization is minimal since the initial mesh can be fairly coarse and easy to generate. As the shape approaches the optimal design, the mesh at each design point becomes finer, in regions necessary for that particular operating condition. The multi-fidelity framework is tightly coupled with the objective error estimation to ensure the optimization accuracy at each fidelity. Computational savings arise from a reduction of the mesh size when the design is far from optimal and avoiding an exhaustive search on low-fidelity meshes. The proposed method is demonstrated on multipoint drag minimization problems of a transonic airfoil with lift and area constraints. Improved accuracy and efficiency are shown compared to traditional fixed-fidelity optimization with a fixed computational mesh.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ast.2020.106004},
journal = {Aerospace Science and Technology},
number = C,
volume = 105,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 08 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Wed Jul 08 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows
journal, May 2003


An optimization-based framework for anisotropic simplex mesh adaptation
journal, September 2012


PDE-constrained optimization with error estimation and control
journal, April 2014


A High-Order Accurate Discontinuous Finite Element Method for the Numerical Solution of the Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations
journal, March 1997


Adjoint-Based, Three-Dimensional Error Prediction and Grid Adaptation
journal, September 2004


Wing Design by Numerical Optimization
journal, July 1978

  • Hicks, Raymond M.; Henne, Preston A.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 15, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.2514/3.58379

p-Multigrid solution of high-order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations
journal, July 2005

  • Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.; Oliver, Todd A.; Lu, James
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 207, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.01.005

Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier-Stokes Equations
journal, November 1999

  • Nielsen, Eric J.; Anderson, W. Kyle
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 37, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.2514/2.640

Drag Prediction Using Adaptive Discontinuous Finite Elements
journal, July 2014

  • Ceze, Marco; Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 51, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.C032622

Entropy-Based Drag-Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation in Two Dimensions
journal, September 2012

  • Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.; Ceze, Marco A.; Roe, Philip L.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.C031795

Nongradient Methods in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization-Status and Potential
journal, January 1999

  • Hajela, Prabhat
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2514/2.2432

Adjoint-based airfoil optimization with discretization error control: ADJOINT-BASED AIRFOIL OPTIMIZATION WITH DISCRETIZATION ERROR CONTROL
journal, November 2014

  • Li, D.; Hartmann, R.
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 77, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/fld.3971

Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes
journal, October 1981


A comparative evaluation of genetic and gradient-based algorithms applied to aerodynamic optimization
journal, January 2008

  • Zingg, David W.; Nemec, Marian; Pulliam, Thomas H.
  • European Journal of Computational Mechanics, Vol. 17, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.3166/remn.17.103-126

Multipoint High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a Transport Aircraft Configuration
journal, January 2014

  • Kenway, Gaetan K. W.; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 51, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.C032150

Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing
journal, January 2016

  • Kenway, Gaetan K. W.; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.J054154

Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers, Part 1
journal, January 1999

  • Reuther, James J.; Jameson, Antony; Alonso, Juan J.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2514/2.2413

Newton-Krylov Algorithm for Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier-Stokes Equations
journal, June 2002

  • Nemec, M.; Zingg, D. W.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 40, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2514/2.1764

Adjoint-based airfoil optimization with adaptive isogeometric discontinuous Galerkin method
journal, February 2019

  • Wang, Kun; Yu, Shengjiao; Wang, Zheng
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 344
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.033

Non-unique transonic flows over airfoils
journal, June 2012


Multipoint and Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
journal, June 2004

  • Nemec, Marian; Zingg, David W.; Pulliam, Thomas H.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 42, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.10415

Adjoint-based adaptive finite element method for the compressible Euler equations using finite calculus
journal, October 2015

  • Kouhi, Mohammad; Oñate, Eugenio; Mavriplis, Dimitri
  • Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 46
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.08.008

Nonuniqueness of transonic flows
journal, September 1999


Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark
journal, April 2015

  • Lyu, Zhoujie; Kenway, Gaetan K. W.; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.J053318

Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations
journal, December 2002

  • Hartmann, Ralf; Houston, Paul
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 183, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7206

Discontinuous Galerkin methods for computational aerodynamics — 3D adaptive flow simulation with the DLR PADGE code
journal, October 2010


A fast mesh deformation method using explicit interpolation
journal, January 2012

  • Luke, Edward; Collins, Eric; Blades, Eric
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 231, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.021

Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation
journal, May 1999


An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods
journal, May 2001


Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems
journal, September 2001

  • Cockburn, Bernardo; Shu, Chi-Wang
  • Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 16, Issue 3, p. 173-261
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1012873910884

Output-based space–time mesh optimization for unsteady flows using continuous-in-time adjoints
journal, July 2017


High-Reynolds number transitional flow simulation via parabolized stability equations with an adaptive RANS solver
journal, August 2019


Aerodynamic Optimization Under a Range of Operating Conditions
journal, November 2006

  • Zingg, David W.; Elias, Samy
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 44, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.23658

An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design
journal, December 2000

  • Giles, Michael B.; Pierce, Niles A.
  • Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 65, Issue 3/4, p. 393-415
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1011430410075

The optimal control of unsteady flows with a discrete adjoint method
journal, January 2008


Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings Using a Parallel Newton-Krylov Approach
journal, March 2012

  • Leung, Timothy M.; Zingg, David W.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 50, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.J051192

High-order CFD methods: current status and perspective: HIGH-ORDER CFD METHODS
journal, January 2013

  • Wang, Z. J.; Fidkowski, Krzysztof; Abgrall, Rémi
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 72, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/fld.3767

A Coupled-Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Method for High-Fidelity Aero-Structural Design
journal, March 2005


Aerodynamic Optimization Algorithm with Integrated Geometry Parameterization and Mesh Movement
journal, February 2010

  • Hicken, Jason E.; Zingg, David W.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 48, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.44033

Aerodynamic design via control theory
journal, September 1988

  • Jameson, Antony
  • Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01061285

Drag Minimization Based on the Navier–Stokes Equations Using a Newton–Krylov Approach
journal, June 2015

  • Osusky, Lana; Buckley, Howard; Reist, Thomas
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.J053457

High-Fidelity Aerostructural Design Optimization of a Supersonic Business Jet
journal, May 2004

  • Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.; Alonso, Juan J.; Reuther, James J.
  • Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 41, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.11478