DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma

Abstract

Abstract Induced seismicity has expanded into south‐central Kansas, an area with rare damaging natural earthquakes, leading to the second‐highest seismicity rate in the central United States after Oklahoma. Here we assess the mechanical effects of large‐scale injection in the combined area of western Oklahoma and southern Kansas during 2010–2018 and its link to the observed seismicity using physics‐based hydromechanical and seismicity rate models. Such models link injection operations to seismic hazards and allow solving for the spatially variable distribution of background seismic productivity that yields an acceptable match between the observed and modeled seismicity. We show that injection in Oklahoma amplifies the total Coulomb stress change and seismicity rate by 1.5‐fold and threefold, respectively, in south‐central Kansas. This cross‐border interaction modulates the annual earthquake probability in Kansas. We conclude that the issue of induced seismicity is not a local problem due to the far‐reaching effects of fluid diffusion.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA, Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USA
  2. School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA
  3. Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1603828
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐SC0019307
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geophysical Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geophysical Research Letters Journal Volume: 47 Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Zhai, Guang, Shirzaei, Manoochehr, and Manga, Michael. Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1029/2019GL085705.
Zhai, Guang, Shirzaei, Manoochehr, & Manga, Michael. Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085705
Zhai, Guang, Shirzaei, Manoochehr, and Manga, Michael. Tue . "Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085705.
@article{osti_1603828,
title = {Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma},
author = {Zhai, Guang and Shirzaei, Manoochehr and Manga, Michael},
abstractNote = {Abstract Induced seismicity has expanded into south‐central Kansas, an area with rare damaging natural earthquakes, leading to the second‐highest seismicity rate in the central United States after Oklahoma. Here we assess the mechanical effects of large‐scale injection in the combined area of western Oklahoma and southern Kansas during 2010–2018 and its link to the observed seismicity using physics‐based hydromechanical and seismicity rate models. Such models link injection operations to seismic hazards and allow solving for the spatially variable distribution of background seismic productivity that yields an acceptable match between the observed and modeled seismicity. We show that injection in Oklahoma amplifies the total Coulomb stress change and seismicity rate by 1.5‐fold and threefold, respectively, in south‐central Kansas. This cross‐border interaction modulates the annual earthquake probability in Kansas. We conclude that the issue of induced seismicity is not a local problem due to the far‐reaching effects of fluid diffusion.},
doi = {10.1029/2019GL085705},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
number = 5,
volume = 47,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Mar 10 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Tue Mar 10 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085705

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

3-D Modeling of Induced Seismicity Along Multiple Faults: Magnitude, Rate, and Location in a Poroelasticity System
journal, November 2018

  • Chang, K. W.; Yoon, H.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 123, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016446

Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity
journal, June 2015

  • Rubinstein, Justin L.; Mahani, Alireza Babaie
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 86, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220150067

Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado
journal, April 2005

  • Ake, J.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 95, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120040072

Fluid Injection and Time-Dependent Seismic Hazard in the Barnett Shale, Texas
journal, May 2018

  • Zhai, Guang; Shirzaei, Manoochehr
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077696

Injection-Induced Earthquakes
journal, July 2013


Constitutive Law for Earthquake Production Based on Rate-and-State Friction: Dieterich 1994 Revisited
journal, May 2018

  • Heimisson, Elias R.; Segall, Paul
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 123, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB015656

Coulomb Stress Transfer Influences Fault Reactivation in Areas of Wastewater Injection
journal, October 2018

  • Qin, Yan; Chen, Xiaowei; Carpenter, Brett M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079713

Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas
journal, August 2012


Geomechanical analysis of fluid injection and seismic fault slip for the M w 4.8 Timpson, Texas, earthquake sequence : GEOMECHANICS OF FLUID INJECTION TIMPSON
journal, April 2016

  • Fan, Zhiqiang; Eichhubl, Peter; Gale, Julia F. W.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 121, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012821

The 2013–2016 Induced Earthquakes in Harper and Sumner Counties, Southern Kansas
journal, February 2018

  • Rubinstein, Justin L.; Ellsworth, William L.; Dougherty, Sara L.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 108, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120170209

The susceptibility of Oklahoma’s basement to seismic reactivation
journal, September 2019


Fluid-induced aseismic fault slip outpaces pore-fluid migration
journal, May 2019


Small Earthquakes Matter in Injection-Induced Seismicity
journal, June 2018

  • Brown, Megan R. M.; Ge, Shemin
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077472

Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma
journal, July 2019

  • Zhai, Guang; Shirzaei, Manoochehr; Manga, Michael
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819225116

Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology
journal, February 1996

  • Christensen, Nikolas I.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 101, Issue B2
  • DOI: 10.1029/95JB03446

Geospatial analysis of Oklahoma (USA) earthquakes (2011–2016): Quantifying the limits of regional-scale earthquake mitigation measures
journal, January 2018

  • Pollyea, Ryan M.; Mohammadi, Neda; Taylor, John E.
  • Geology, Vol. 46, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1130/G39945.1

Injection-induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects: INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY
journal, July 2015

  • Segall, P.; Lu, S.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 120, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JB012060

Accelerated Fill‐Up of the Arbuckle Group Aquifer and Links to U.S. Midcontinent Seismicity
journal, March 2019

  • Ansari, E.; Bidgoli, T. S.; Hollenbach, A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 124, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016926

The 2001-Present Induced Earthquake Sequence in the Raton Basin of Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado
journal, September 2014

  • Rubinstein, J. L.; Ellsworth, W. L.; McGarr, A.
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 104, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1785/0120140009

An updated stress map of the continental United States reveals heterogeneous intraplate stress
journal, May 2018


Engineering seismic risk analysis
journal, October 1968

  • Cornell, C. Allin
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 58, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1785/BSSA0580051583

Maximum magnitude estimations of induced earthquakes at Paradox Valley, Colorado, from cumulative injection volume and geometry of seismicity clusters
journal, November 2014

  • Yeck, William L.; Block, Lisa V.; Wood, Christopher K.
  • Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 200, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu394

Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements: DEFORMATION OF NORTH AMERICAN PLATE
journal, June 2006

  • Calais, E.; Han, J. Y.; DeMets, C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 111, Issue B6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005JB004253

Rapid Response, Monitoring, and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity near Greeley, Colorado
journal, June 2016

  • Yeck, W. L.; Sheehan, A. F.; Benz, H. M.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 87, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220150275

Waveform‐Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Oklahoma and Southern Kansas Illuminates the Regional Fault Network
journal, July 2017

  • Schoenball, Martin; Ellsworth, William L.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 88, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220170083

Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio: INDUCED SEISMICITY IN YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO
journal, July 2013

  • Kim, Won-Young
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 118, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50247

2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes
journal, March 2018

  • Petersen, Mark D.; Mueller, Charles S.; Moschetti, Morgan P.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 89, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220180005

Leakage and Increasing Fluid Pressure Detected in Oklahoma's Wastewater Disposal Reservoir
journal, March 2019

  • Barbour, Andrew J.; Xue, Lian; Roeloffs, Evelyn
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 124, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019JB017327

Poroelasticity: Efficient modeling of strongly coupled, slow deformation processes in a multilayered half‐space
journal, March 2003

  • Wang, Rongjiang; Kümpel, Hans‐Joachim
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 68, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.1567241

Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection
journal, July 2014


The 24 January 2013 ML 4.4 Earthquake near Paradox, Colorado, and Its Relation to Deep Well Injection
journal, May 2014

  • Block, L. V.; Wood, C. K.; Yeck, W. L.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 85, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220130188

2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes
journal, March 2017

  • Petersen, Mark D.; Mueller, Charles S.; Moschetti, Morgan P.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 88, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220170005

The Denver EarthquakeS
journal, September 1968


Earthquakes in Kansas Induced by Extremely Far‐Field Pressure Diffusion
journal, February 2018

  • Peterie, Shelby L.; Miller, Richard D.; Intfen, John W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL076334

Hydraulic properties of injection formations constrained by surface deformation
journal, June 2019


Wastewater disposal and earthquake swarm activity at the southern end of the Central Valley, California: EARTHQUAKE SWARMS AND FLUID INJECTION
journal, February 2016

  • Goebel, T. H. W.; Hosseini, S. M.; Cappa, F.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066948

Oklahoma's induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth
journal, February 2018


Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982
journal, June 1985


A Rare Moderate‐Sized ( M w  4.9) Earthquake in Kansas: Rupture Process of the Milan, Kansas, Earthquake of 12 November 2014 and Its Relationship to Fluid Injection
journal, September 2016

  • Choy, George L.; Rubinstein, Justin L.; Yeck, William L.
  • Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 87, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1785/0220160100

The 2016 Mw5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquakes: Evidence for long-range poroelastic triggering at >40 km from fluid disposal wells
journal, August 2017


Numerical Models of Pore Pressure and Stress Changes Along Basement Faults Due to Wastewater Injection: Applications to the 2014 Milan, Kansas Earthquake
journal, April 2018

  • Hearn, Elizabeth H.; Koltermann, Christine; Rubinstein, Justin L.
  • Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 19, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GC007194

A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering
journal, February 1994

  • Dieterich, James
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 99, Issue B2
  • DOI: 10.1029/93JB02581

The biases and trends in fault zone hydrogeology conceptual models: global compilation and categorical data analysis
journal, September 2016

  • Scibek, J.; Gleeson, T.; McKenzie, J. M.
  • Geofluids, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gfl.12188

Surface uplift and time-dependent seismic hazard due to fluid injection in eastern Texas
journal, September 2016